在资本主义的风口浪尖上

IF 1.8 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
J. Peck
{"title":"在资本主义的风口浪尖上","authors":"J. Peck","doi":"10.1080/23792949.2020.1866996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The paper presents a critique of persistent tendencies in (macro)economic theorizing to draw binary distinctions between states and markets, and between liberal-market capitalism and its (more statist) others. Against this dichotomous perspective, a case is made for conjuncturally sited investigations of reconfigured capitalisms and recombinant economic forms. The ambitious scheme to construct a ‘Greater Bay Area’ (GBA) in China’s Pearl River Delta, with its inchoate remit to transcend the two-systems divide between ‘free market’ Hong Kong and the ‘state capitalism’ of the mainland, is taken as a case in point. The GBA scheme entails the construction of a new political economic scale, imagined as a developmental horizon and as a space for experimentation in economic statecraft.","PeriodicalId":31513,"journal":{"name":"Area Development and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23792949.2020.1866996","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On capitalism’s cusp\",\"authors\":\"J. Peck\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23792949.2020.1866996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The paper presents a critique of persistent tendencies in (macro)economic theorizing to draw binary distinctions between states and markets, and between liberal-market capitalism and its (more statist) others. Against this dichotomous perspective, a case is made for conjuncturally sited investigations of reconfigured capitalisms and recombinant economic forms. The ambitious scheme to construct a ‘Greater Bay Area’ (GBA) in China’s Pearl River Delta, with its inchoate remit to transcend the two-systems divide between ‘free market’ Hong Kong and the ‘state capitalism’ of the mainland, is taken as a case in point. The GBA scheme entails the construction of a new political economic scale, imagined as a developmental horizon and as a space for experimentation in economic statecraft.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Area Development and Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23792949.2020.1866996\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Area Development and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2020.1866996\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Area Development and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2020.1866996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

本文对(宏观)经济理论化中持续倾向于在国家和市场之间,以及在自由市场资本主义和(更多的国家主义)其他之间划分二元区分的趋势进行了批评。针对这种二分法的观点,提出了对重新配置的资本主义和重组的经济形式进行联合选址调查的案例。在中国珠江三角洲建设“大湾区”(GBA)的雄心勃勃的计划,其初步目标是超越香港的“自由市场”和内地的“国家资本主义”两种制度的界限,就是一个很好的例子。大湾区计划需要构建一个新的政治经济规模,被想象为一个发展的地平线,一个经济治国方术的实验空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On capitalism’s cusp
ABSTRACT The paper presents a critique of persistent tendencies in (macro)economic theorizing to draw binary distinctions between states and markets, and between liberal-market capitalism and its (more statist) others. Against this dichotomous perspective, a case is made for conjuncturally sited investigations of reconfigured capitalisms and recombinant economic forms. The ambitious scheme to construct a ‘Greater Bay Area’ (GBA) in China’s Pearl River Delta, with its inchoate remit to transcend the two-systems divide between ‘free market’ Hong Kong and the ‘state capitalism’ of the mainland, is taken as a case in point. The GBA scheme entails the construction of a new political economic scale, imagined as a developmental horizon and as a space for experimentation in economic statecraft.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Area Development and Policy
Area Development and Policy DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信