超声引导下14号芯针活检对乳腺结节的诊断价值

Chun Zhang, Xuejuan Yu, Yonghui Zhang, Fenfen Fu, Dongjie Zhang, Lingduo Xie, Futao Chu, Chen Li, Qinqin Wang, Shuo Xu, Yuntao Xie
{"title":"超声引导下14号芯针活检对乳腺结节的诊断价值","authors":"Chun Zhang, Xuejuan Yu, Yonghui Zhang, Fenfen Fu, Dongjie Zhang, Lingduo Xie, Futao Chu, Chen Li, Qinqin Wang, Shuo Xu, Yuntao Xie","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.10.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo analyze the diagnostic value of ultrasound guided 14 gauge coreneedle biopsy (US-CNB) in breast nodules. \n \n \nMethods \nWe retrospectively analyzed the pathological results of US-CNB and surgical excision from 373 breast nodules in Peking University International Hospital from Sep 2016 to Nov 2018 to evaluate the accuracy of 14g US-CNB. \n \n \nResults \nA total of 349 patients(373 nodules)underwent US-CNB. US-CNB reported 282 benign lesions(75.6%, 282/373), 20 high-risklesions(5.4%, 20/373), and 71 malignant lesions(19.0%, 71/373). For 282 CNB reported benign lesions, the surgical pathology confirmed 235 lesions , 46 for high-risk lesions and 1 for malignant lesion with a concordancy of 83.3%(235/282)and the underestimation rate was 16.7%(47/282). US-CNB identified 20 high-risk lesions. According to surgical results, 15 were high-risk lesions and 5 were malignant lesions with a concordancy of 75% (15/20)and the underestimation rate was 25%(5/20). When it comes to malignant lesions, the excision results showed that 70 were malignant lesions and 1was high-risk lesion with a concordancy of 98.6%(70/71)and the overestimation rate was 1.4%(1/71). The concordance of the histological type , calculated for 50 invasive carcinomas, was 92% (46/50) with a kappa value of 0.77.The concordance of the histological grade could be calculated for 38 invasive ductal carcinomas with the Elston-Elllis Method . It was 89.5% (34/38) with a kappa value of 0.57. \n \n \nConclusions \nThe pathology result of 14gUS-CNB is in good consistency with surgical excision for breast benign and malignant lesions. \n \n \nKey words: \nBreast neoplasms; Biopsy; Concordance","PeriodicalId":66425,"journal":{"name":"中华普通外科杂志","volume":"34 1","pages":"867-870"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided 14 gauge-core needle biopsy in breast nodules\",\"authors\":\"Chun Zhang, Xuejuan Yu, Yonghui Zhang, Fenfen Fu, Dongjie Zhang, Lingduo Xie, Futao Chu, Chen Li, Qinqin Wang, Shuo Xu, Yuntao Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.10.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo analyze the diagnostic value of ultrasound guided 14 gauge coreneedle biopsy (US-CNB) in breast nodules. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nWe retrospectively analyzed the pathological results of US-CNB and surgical excision from 373 breast nodules in Peking University International Hospital from Sep 2016 to Nov 2018 to evaluate the accuracy of 14g US-CNB. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nA total of 349 patients(373 nodules)underwent US-CNB. US-CNB reported 282 benign lesions(75.6%, 282/373), 20 high-risklesions(5.4%, 20/373), and 71 malignant lesions(19.0%, 71/373). For 282 CNB reported benign lesions, the surgical pathology confirmed 235 lesions , 46 for high-risk lesions and 1 for malignant lesion with a concordancy of 83.3%(235/282)and the underestimation rate was 16.7%(47/282). US-CNB identified 20 high-risk lesions. According to surgical results, 15 were high-risk lesions and 5 were malignant lesions with a concordancy of 75% (15/20)and the underestimation rate was 25%(5/20). When it comes to malignant lesions, the excision results showed that 70 were malignant lesions and 1was high-risk lesion with a concordancy of 98.6%(70/71)and the overestimation rate was 1.4%(1/71). The concordance of the histological type , calculated for 50 invasive carcinomas, was 92% (46/50) with a kappa value of 0.77.The concordance of the histological grade could be calculated for 38 invasive ductal carcinomas with the Elston-Elllis Method . It was 89.5% (34/38) with a kappa value of 0.57. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThe pathology result of 14gUS-CNB is in good consistency with surgical excision for breast benign and malignant lesions. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nBreast neoplasms; Biopsy; Concordance\",\"PeriodicalId\":66425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华普通外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"867-870\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华普通外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.10.013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华普通外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.10.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析超声引导下14号针穿刺活检(US-CNB)对乳腺结节的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析2016年9月至2018年11月北京大学国际医院373例乳腺结节US-CNB及手术切除的病理结果,评价14g US-CNB的准确性。结果349例(373个结节)行US-CNB。US-CNB报告良性病变282例(75.6%,282/373),高危病变20例(5.4%,20/373),恶性病变71例(19.0%,71/373)。282例CNB良性病变,手术病理证实235例,高危46例,恶性1例,一致性为83.3%(235/282),低估率为16.7%(47/282)。US-CNB确定了20个高危病变。根据手术结果,高危病变15例,恶性病变5例,一致性为75%(15/20),低估率为25%(5/20)。对于恶性病变,切除结果为恶性病变70例,高危病变1例,一致性为98.6%(70/71),高估率为1.4%(1/71)。50例浸润性癌的组织学类型一致性为92% (46/50),kappa值为0.77。应用elston - ellis法计算38例浸润性导管癌组织学分级的一致性。为89.5% (34/38),kappa值为0.57。结论14gUS-CNB的病理结果与乳腺良恶性病变的手术切除具有良好的一致性。关键词:乳腺肿瘤;活组织检查;和谐
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided 14 gauge-core needle biopsy in breast nodules
Objective To analyze the diagnostic value of ultrasound guided 14 gauge coreneedle biopsy (US-CNB) in breast nodules. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the pathological results of US-CNB and surgical excision from 373 breast nodules in Peking University International Hospital from Sep 2016 to Nov 2018 to evaluate the accuracy of 14g US-CNB. Results A total of 349 patients(373 nodules)underwent US-CNB. US-CNB reported 282 benign lesions(75.6%, 282/373), 20 high-risklesions(5.4%, 20/373), and 71 malignant lesions(19.0%, 71/373). For 282 CNB reported benign lesions, the surgical pathology confirmed 235 lesions , 46 for high-risk lesions and 1 for malignant lesion with a concordancy of 83.3%(235/282)and the underestimation rate was 16.7%(47/282). US-CNB identified 20 high-risk lesions. According to surgical results, 15 were high-risk lesions and 5 were malignant lesions with a concordancy of 75% (15/20)and the underestimation rate was 25%(5/20). When it comes to malignant lesions, the excision results showed that 70 were malignant lesions and 1was high-risk lesion with a concordancy of 98.6%(70/71)and the overestimation rate was 1.4%(1/71). The concordance of the histological type , calculated for 50 invasive carcinomas, was 92% (46/50) with a kappa value of 0.77.The concordance of the histological grade could be calculated for 38 invasive ductal carcinomas with the Elston-Elllis Method . It was 89.5% (34/38) with a kappa value of 0.57. Conclusions The pathology result of 14gUS-CNB is in good consistency with surgical excision for breast benign and malignant lesions. Key words: Breast neoplasms; Biopsy; Concordance
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9825
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信