皮肤瘙痒的性别和病史是否是影响视觉诱发瘙痒现象的因素?探索性研究

D. Lloyd, R. Dodd, C. Higgins, M. Burke, F. McGlone
{"title":"皮肤瘙痒的性别和病史是否是影响视觉诱发瘙痒现象的因素?探索性研究","authors":"D. Lloyd, R. Dodd, C. Higgins, M. Burke, F. McGlone","doi":"10.1097/itx.0000000000000010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: We have previously shown that sensations of itch and the scratch response can be evoked using itch-related images. However, we did not determine whether individual differences in a person’s experience of itch could moderate this effect. This exploratory study aimed to determine whether sex or a history of pruritic skin conditions (PSCs) could influence the effects of visually evoked itch and scratch. Methods: Forty-one participants (19 males; 16 with a history of PSCs) viewed static images that could either be itch or nonitch related. These were further separated by picture type: “skin contact” (ants crawling on the hand vs. a butterfly on the finger); “skin response” (scratching an insect bite vs. washing the hands); “skin condition” (psoriasis vs. freckles) or “context only” (insects vs. birds). Images were rated using a 10-point scale by answering: “How itchy do you feel?” (Self-rating) and “How itchy do you think the person in the picture feels?” (Other-rating). Frequency and location of scratching was also recorded. Results: The highest itch scores were to itch-related skin contact pictures. Females gave higher itch ratings than males, and people with a history of PSCs gave higher itch ratings when viewing images of people scratching. There was no correlation between itch ratings and scratch response, and no relationship between body site viewed and location of scratching. Discussion: There is a heightened response to itch-related cues in females and those with PSCs, indicating a more centrally mediated pathway bringing subconscious itch sensations into conscious awareness in these populations. These findings could influence personalized treatment interventions aimed at reducing awareness of itch sensations in susceptible individuals.","PeriodicalId":73523,"journal":{"name":"Itch (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":"2 1","pages":"e10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are sex and history of pruritic skin conditions factors which affect the phenomenon of visually evoked itch? An exploratory study\",\"authors\":\"D. Lloyd, R. Dodd, C. Higgins, M. Burke, F. McGlone\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/itx.0000000000000010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: We have previously shown that sensations of itch and the scratch response can be evoked using itch-related images. However, we did not determine whether individual differences in a person’s experience of itch could moderate this effect. This exploratory study aimed to determine whether sex or a history of pruritic skin conditions (PSCs) could influence the effects of visually evoked itch and scratch. Methods: Forty-one participants (19 males; 16 with a history of PSCs) viewed static images that could either be itch or nonitch related. These were further separated by picture type: “skin contact” (ants crawling on the hand vs. a butterfly on the finger); “skin response” (scratching an insect bite vs. washing the hands); “skin condition” (psoriasis vs. freckles) or “context only” (insects vs. birds). Images were rated using a 10-point scale by answering: “How itchy do you feel?” (Self-rating) and “How itchy do you think the person in the picture feels?” (Other-rating). Frequency and location of scratching was also recorded. Results: The highest itch scores were to itch-related skin contact pictures. Females gave higher itch ratings than males, and people with a history of PSCs gave higher itch ratings when viewing images of people scratching. There was no correlation between itch ratings and scratch response, and no relationship between body site viewed and location of scratching. Discussion: There is a heightened response to itch-related cues in females and those with PSCs, indicating a more centrally mediated pathway bringing subconscious itch sensations into conscious awareness in these populations. These findings could influence personalized treatment interventions aimed at reducing awareness of itch sensations in susceptible individuals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Itch (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"e10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Itch (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/itx.0000000000000010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Itch (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/itx.0000000000000010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们之前已经证明,瘙痒的感觉和抓挠反应可以用瘙痒相关的图像被唤起。然而,我们并没有确定一个人的瘙痒经历的个体差异是否可以缓和这种影响。本探索性研究旨在确定性别或瘙痒性皮肤状况(PSCs)的历史是否会影响视觉诱发瘙痒和抓伤的效果。方法:41例受试者(男性19例;(16例有psc病史)查看了可能与瘙痒或非瘙痒相关的静态图像。这些照片根据图片类型进一步分开:“皮肤接触”(蚂蚁在手上爬行,蝴蝶在手指上);“皮肤反应”(抓挠昆虫叮咬vs.洗手);“皮肤状况”(牛皮癣vs雀斑)或“仅限环境”(昆虫vs鸟类)。通过回答:“你觉得有多痒?”(自我评价)和“你觉得照片中的人有多痒?””(其他评级)。同时记录抓挠的频率和位置。结果:瘙痒评分最高的是与瘙痒相关的皮肤接触图片。女性对瘙痒的评分高于男性,而有psc病史的人在观看人们抓挠的图像时,对瘙痒的评分更高。瘙痒评分和抓痕反应之间没有相关性,观察身体部位和抓痕位置之间也没有相关性。讨论:在女性和具有PSCs的人群中,对瘙痒相关线索的反应增强,表明在这些人群中,有一种更集中的介导途径将潜意识的瘙痒感觉带入有意识的意识。这些发现可能会影响个性化的治疗干预措施,旨在减少易感个体对瘙痒感觉的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are sex and history of pruritic skin conditions factors which affect the phenomenon of visually evoked itch? An exploratory study
Introduction: We have previously shown that sensations of itch and the scratch response can be evoked using itch-related images. However, we did not determine whether individual differences in a person’s experience of itch could moderate this effect. This exploratory study aimed to determine whether sex or a history of pruritic skin conditions (PSCs) could influence the effects of visually evoked itch and scratch. Methods: Forty-one participants (19 males; 16 with a history of PSCs) viewed static images that could either be itch or nonitch related. These were further separated by picture type: “skin contact” (ants crawling on the hand vs. a butterfly on the finger); “skin response” (scratching an insect bite vs. washing the hands); “skin condition” (psoriasis vs. freckles) or “context only” (insects vs. birds). Images were rated using a 10-point scale by answering: “How itchy do you feel?” (Self-rating) and “How itchy do you think the person in the picture feels?” (Other-rating). Frequency and location of scratching was also recorded. Results: The highest itch scores were to itch-related skin contact pictures. Females gave higher itch ratings than males, and people with a history of PSCs gave higher itch ratings when viewing images of people scratching. There was no correlation between itch ratings and scratch response, and no relationship between body site viewed and location of scratching. Discussion: There is a heightened response to itch-related cues in females and those with PSCs, indicating a more centrally mediated pathway bringing subconscious itch sensations into conscious awareness in these populations. These findings could influence personalized treatment interventions aimed at reducing awareness of itch sensations in susceptible individuals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信