{"title":"电动汽车经济学","authors":"D. Rapson, Erich Muehlegger","doi":"10.1086/725484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the private and public economics of electric vehicles (EVs) and discuss when market forces can be expected to produce the optimal path of EV adoption. Privately, consumer cost savings from EVs vary. Some experience net benefits from choosing gasoline cars, even after accounting for EV subsidies. Publicly, we survey the literature documenting the external costs and benefits of EVs and highlight several themes for optimal policy design. These include (1) promoting regional variation in EV policies that align private incentives with social benefits, (2) pursuing a time-path of policies that reflects changing marginal benefits, and (3) rationalizing electricity and gasoline prices to reflect their social marginal cost. On the one hand, research suggests optimal policy be front-loaded and then ramp down over time as industries gain experience in EV production and as charging infrastructure is put in place. On the other hand, as electricity generation becomes cleaner over time, environmental considerations may favor increasing subsidies as the environmental benefits of driving EVs rise relative to conventional vehicles.","PeriodicalId":47676,"journal":{"name":"Review of Environmental Economics and Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":"274 - 294"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Economics of Electric Vehicles\",\"authors\":\"D. Rapson, Erich Muehlegger\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/725484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examine the private and public economics of electric vehicles (EVs) and discuss when market forces can be expected to produce the optimal path of EV adoption. Privately, consumer cost savings from EVs vary. Some experience net benefits from choosing gasoline cars, even after accounting for EV subsidies. Publicly, we survey the literature documenting the external costs and benefits of EVs and highlight several themes for optimal policy design. These include (1) promoting regional variation in EV policies that align private incentives with social benefits, (2) pursuing a time-path of policies that reflects changing marginal benefits, and (3) rationalizing electricity and gasoline prices to reflect their social marginal cost. On the one hand, research suggests optimal policy be front-loaded and then ramp down over time as industries gain experience in EV production and as charging infrastructure is put in place. On the other hand, as electricity generation becomes cleaner over time, environmental considerations may favor increasing subsidies as the environmental benefits of driving EVs rise relative to conventional vehicles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Environmental Economics and Policy\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"274 - 294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Environmental Economics and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/725484\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Environmental Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725484","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
We examine the private and public economics of electric vehicles (EVs) and discuss when market forces can be expected to produce the optimal path of EV adoption. Privately, consumer cost savings from EVs vary. Some experience net benefits from choosing gasoline cars, even after accounting for EV subsidies. Publicly, we survey the literature documenting the external costs and benefits of EVs and highlight several themes for optimal policy design. These include (1) promoting regional variation in EV policies that align private incentives with social benefits, (2) pursuing a time-path of policies that reflects changing marginal benefits, and (3) rationalizing electricity and gasoline prices to reflect their social marginal cost. On the one hand, research suggests optimal policy be front-loaded and then ramp down over time as industries gain experience in EV production and as charging infrastructure is put in place. On the other hand, as electricity generation becomes cleaner over time, environmental considerations may favor increasing subsidies as the environmental benefits of driving EVs rise relative to conventional vehicles.
期刊介绍:
The Review of Environmental Economics and Policy fills the gap between traditional academic journals and the general interest press by providing a widely accessible yet scholarly source for the latest thinking on environmental economics and related policy. The Review publishes symposia, articles, and regular features that contribute to one or more of the following goals: •to identify and synthesize lessons learned from recent and ongoing environmental economics research; •to provide economic analysis of environmental policy issues; •to promote the sharing of ideas and perspectives among the various sub-fields of environmental economics;