电动汽车经济学

IF 7.8 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
D. Rapson, Erich Muehlegger
{"title":"电动汽车经济学","authors":"D. Rapson, Erich Muehlegger","doi":"10.1086/725484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the private and public economics of electric vehicles (EVs) and discuss when market forces can be expected to produce the optimal path of EV adoption. Privately, consumer cost savings from EVs vary. Some experience net benefits from choosing gasoline cars, even after accounting for EV subsidies. Publicly, we survey the literature documenting the external costs and benefits of EVs and highlight several themes for optimal policy design. These include (1) promoting regional variation in EV policies that align private incentives with social benefits, (2) pursuing a time-path of policies that reflects changing marginal benefits, and (3) rationalizing electricity and gasoline prices to reflect their social marginal cost. On the one hand, research suggests optimal policy be front-loaded and then ramp down over time as industries gain experience in EV production and as charging infrastructure is put in place. On the other hand, as electricity generation becomes cleaner over time, environmental considerations may favor increasing subsidies as the environmental benefits of driving EVs rise relative to conventional vehicles.","PeriodicalId":47676,"journal":{"name":"Review of Environmental Economics and Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":"274 - 294"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Economics of Electric Vehicles\",\"authors\":\"D. Rapson, Erich Muehlegger\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/725484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examine the private and public economics of electric vehicles (EVs) and discuss when market forces can be expected to produce the optimal path of EV adoption. Privately, consumer cost savings from EVs vary. Some experience net benefits from choosing gasoline cars, even after accounting for EV subsidies. Publicly, we survey the literature documenting the external costs and benefits of EVs and highlight several themes for optimal policy design. These include (1) promoting regional variation in EV policies that align private incentives with social benefits, (2) pursuing a time-path of policies that reflects changing marginal benefits, and (3) rationalizing electricity and gasoline prices to reflect their social marginal cost. On the one hand, research suggests optimal policy be front-loaded and then ramp down over time as industries gain experience in EV production and as charging infrastructure is put in place. On the other hand, as electricity generation becomes cleaner over time, environmental considerations may favor increasing subsidies as the environmental benefits of driving EVs rise relative to conventional vehicles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Environmental Economics and Policy\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"274 - 294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Environmental Economics and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/725484\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Environmental Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725484","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

我们研究了电动汽车(EV)的私人和公共经济学,并讨论了市场力量何时可以产生电动汽车采用的最佳路径。私下里,消费者从电动汽车上节省的成本各不相同。即使算上电动汽车补贴,一些人还是从选择汽油车中获得了净收益。公开地,我们调查了记录电动汽车外部成本和收益的文献,并强调了优化政策设计的几个主题。这些措施包括:(1)促进电动汽车政策的区域差异,使私人激励与社会效益相一致;(2)追求反映边际效益变化的政策时间路径;(3)合理化电力和汽油价格,以反映其社会边际成本。一方面,研究表明,随着行业在电动汽车生产方面的经验积累和充电基础设施的到位,最优政策应该提前到位,然后逐渐减少。另一方面,随着时间的推移,发电变得越来越清洁,随着驾驶电动汽车的环境效益相对于传统汽车的提高,环境方面的考虑可能倾向于增加补贴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Economics of Electric Vehicles
We examine the private and public economics of electric vehicles (EVs) and discuss when market forces can be expected to produce the optimal path of EV adoption. Privately, consumer cost savings from EVs vary. Some experience net benefits from choosing gasoline cars, even after accounting for EV subsidies. Publicly, we survey the literature documenting the external costs and benefits of EVs and highlight several themes for optimal policy design. These include (1) promoting regional variation in EV policies that align private incentives with social benefits, (2) pursuing a time-path of policies that reflects changing marginal benefits, and (3) rationalizing electricity and gasoline prices to reflect their social marginal cost. On the one hand, research suggests optimal policy be front-loaded and then ramp down over time as industries gain experience in EV production and as charging infrastructure is put in place. On the other hand, as electricity generation becomes cleaner over time, environmental considerations may favor increasing subsidies as the environmental benefits of driving EVs rise relative to conventional vehicles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Review of Environmental Economics and Policy fills the gap between traditional academic journals and the general interest press by providing a widely accessible yet scholarly source for the latest thinking on environmental economics and related policy. The Review publishes symposia, articles, and regular features that contribute to one or more of the following goals: •to identify and synthesize lessons learned from recent and ongoing environmental economics research; •to provide economic analysis of environmental policy issues; •to promote the sharing of ideas and perspectives among the various sub-fields of environmental economics;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信