2型糖尿病患者胰岛素抵抗背景下口服降糖药疗效的描述性比较

Sandip Chakraborty, Amrit Karmakar, I. Dawn, Sangita Samadder, Dipa Mondal
{"title":"2型糖尿病患者胰岛素抵抗背景下口服降糖药疗效的描述性比较","authors":"Sandip Chakraborty, Amrit Karmakar, I. Dawn, Sangita Samadder, Dipa Mondal","doi":"10.20473/ijph.v18i2.2023.314-324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:Different homeostatic models for the assessment of beta cell function in patients with insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus suggest that Dipeptidyl Peptidase (DPP-4) inhibitors cause less beta cell stress. Aims: The present study aimed to compare and contrast insulin resistance in two groups of patients taking oral hypoglycemic agents, DPP-4 plus metformin and glimepiride plus metformin, on the basis of fasting and postprandial c-peptide and insulin resistance estimated by homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Methods: This preliminary descriptive observational study was conducted from 2018 to 2019 in the service Laboratory of the Department of Biochemistry, in collaboration with the Endocrinology Department, Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata. Serum C-peptide, serum insulin, and plasma glucose levels were measured in both fasting and post-prandial states along with glycated hemoglobin. Result: In the fasting and fed state, the secretagogue effect of glimepiride-metformin combination was significantly higher (p = 0.017) than that of the linagliptin-metformin combination. Conclusion: Patients treated with glimepiride showed high post prandial insulin levels and high post prandial glucose excursion. This finding can be explained by the probable increase in insulin resistance, which is reflected in their post-prandial C peptide level. However, in the case of linagliptin, one mechanism of decreased post-prandial glucose is believed to be the inhibition of α-cell glucagon release, thereby relieving β-cell stress","PeriodicalId":33636,"journal":{"name":"The Indonesian Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A DESCRIPTIVE COMPARISON OF RESPONSE OF ORAL HYPOGLYCEMIC AGENTS AMONG T2DM IN A BACKDROP OF INSULIN RESISTANCE\",\"authors\":\"Sandip Chakraborty, Amrit Karmakar, I. Dawn, Sangita Samadder, Dipa Mondal\",\"doi\":\"10.20473/ijph.v18i2.2023.314-324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction:Different homeostatic models for the assessment of beta cell function in patients with insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus suggest that Dipeptidyl Peptidase (DPP-4) inhibitors cause less beta cell stress. Aims: The present study aimed to compare and contrast insulin resistance in two groups of patients taking oral hypoglycemic agents, DPP-4 plus metformin and glimepiride plus metformin, on the basis of fasting and postprandial c-peptide and insulin resistance estimated by homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Methods: This preliminary descriptive observational study was conducted from 2018 to 2019 in the service Laboratory of the Department of Biochemistry, in collaboration with the Endocrinology Department, Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata. Serum C-peptide, serum insulin, and plasma glucose levels were measured in both fasting and post-prandial states along with glycated hemoglobin. Result: In the fasting and fed state, the secretagogue effect of glimepiride-metformin combination was significantly higher (p = 0.017) than that of the linagliptin-metformin combination. Conclusion: Patients treated with glimepiride showed high post prandial insulin levels and high post prandial glucose excursion. This finding can be explained by the probable increase in insulin resistance, which is reflected in their post-prandial C peptide level. However, in the case of linagliptin, one mechanism of decreased post-prandial glucose is believed to be the inhibition of α-cell glucagon release, thereby relieving β-cell stress\",\"PeriodicalId\":33636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Indonesian Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Indonesian Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20473/ijph.v18i2.2023.314-324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indonesian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ijph.v18i2.2023.314-324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:用于评估2型糖尿病胰岛素抵抗患者β细胞功能的不同稳态模型表明,二肽基肽酶(DPP-4)抑制剂引起的β细胞应激较少。目的:本研究旨在比较和对比两组口服降糖药DPP-4 +二甲双胍和格列美脲+二甲双胍患者在空腹和餐后c肽及胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)的基础上的胰岛素抵抗。方法:本初步描述性观察研究于2018 - 2019年在生物化学系服务实验室与加尔各答Nil Ratan Sircar医学院和医院内分泌科合作进行。测定空腹和餐后状态下血清c肽、血清胰岛素和血浆葡萄糖水平以及糖化血红蛋白。结果:在空腹和进食状态下,格列美脲-二甲双胍联合用药的促分泌作用显著高于利格列汀-二甲双胍联合用药(p = 0.017)。结论:格列美脲治疗的患者餐后胰岛素水平高,餐后血糖漂移高。这一发现可以用胰岛素抵抗的可能增加来解释,这反映在他们餐后的C肽水平上。然而,利格列汀降低餐后血糖的一个机制被认为是抑制α-细胞胰高血糖素的释放,从而缓解β-细胞应激
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A DESCRIPTIVE COMPARISON OF RESPONSE OF ORAL HYPOGLYCEMIC AGENTS AMONG T2DM IN A BACKDROP OF INSULIN RESISTANCE
Introduction:Different homeostatic models for the assessment of beta cell function in patients with insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus suggest that Dipeptidyl Peptidase (DPP-4) inhibitors cause less beta cell stress. Aims: The present study aimed to compare and contrast insulin resistance in two groups of patients taking oral hypoglycemic agents, DPP-4 plus metformin and glimepiride plus metformin, on the basis of fasting and postprandial c-peptide and insulin resistance estimated by homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Methods: This preliminary descriptive observational study was conducted from 2018 to 2019 in the service Laboratory of the Department of Biochemistry, in collaboration with the Endocrinology Department, Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata. Serum C-peptide, serum insulin, and plasma glucose levels were measured in both fasting and post-prandial states along with glycated hemoglobin. Result: In the fasting and fed state, the secretagogue effect of glimepiride-metformin combination was significantly higher (p = 0.017) than that of the linagliptin-metformin combination. Conclusion: Patients treated with glimepiride showed high post prandial insulin levels and high post prandial glucose excursion. This finding can be explained by the probable increase in insulin resistance, which is reflected in their post-prandial C peptide level. However, in the case of linagliptin, one mechanism of decreased post-prandial glucose is believed to be the inhibition of α-cell glucagon release, thereby relieving β-cell stress
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信