社论

Q4 Arts and Humanities

Art in Translation Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17561310.2020.1769903

Iain Boyd Whyte

{"title":"社论","authors":"Iain Boyd Whyte","doi":"10.1080/17561310.2020.1769903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historically, translation in the visual arts was predicated on a deficitbased model, whereby canonical, Eurocentric texts produced in the arthistorical centers of the West are transported into the supposed margins of art history: W€ olfflin into Chinese, for example. Art in Translation has always challenged this model, arguing that its function is to enable cross-cultural dialogue rather than promote a one-way flow. As the editorial to the very first issue of the journal explained:","PeriodicalId":53629,"journal":{"name":"Art in Translation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17561310.2020.1769903","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial\",\"authors\":\"Iain Boyd Whyte\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17561310.2020.1769903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Historically, translation in the visual arts was predicated on a deficitbased model, whereby canonical, Eurocentric texts produced in the arthistorical centers of the West are transported into the supposed margins of art history: W€ olfflin into Chinese, for example. Art in Translation has always challenged this model, arguing that its function is to enable cross-cultural dialogue rather than promote a one-way flow. As the editorial to the very first issue of the journal explained:\",\"PeriodicalId\":53629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Art in Translation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17561310.2020.1769903\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Art in Translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17561310.2020.1769903\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art in Translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17561310.2020.1769903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

从历史上看，视觉艺术的翻译是基于一种基于定义的模式，即在西方艺术史中心产生的规范的、以欧洲为中心的文本被输送到所谓的艺术史边缘：例如，将W€olfflin翻译成中文。翻译艺术一直在挑战这种模式，认为它的功能是促进跨文化对话，而不是单向流动。正如该杂志第一期的社论所解释的那样：

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Editorial

Historically, translation in the visual arts was predicated on a deficitbased model, whereby canonical, Eurocentric texts produced in the arthistorical centers of the West are transported into the supposed margins of art history: W€ olfflin into Chinese, for example. Art in Translation has always challenged this model, arguing that its function is to enable cross-cultural dialogue rather than promote a one-way flow. As the editorial to the very first issue of the journal explained:

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Art in Translation Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量