{"title":"邪恶问题的问题","authors":"S. André","doi":"10.4236/OJPP.2021.112023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of evil has been around for centuries but as yet no consensus \nexists as to its significance for atheism or theism. After a brief historical \nreview, I focus on the debate between two leading contemporary philosophers, \nRowe and Plantinga, and argue that neither has succeeded in resolving the \nevidential version of the problem of evil. It is time to turn from the \ntheological issue to practical issues about pointless suffering. Using a common \nsense approach, I argue that there are countless cases of pointless suffering \nand that they deserve our undivided attention.","PeriodicalId":91152,"journal":{"name":"Open journal of philosophy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Problem with the Problem of Evil\",\"authors\":\"S. André\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/OJPP.2021.112023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem of evil has been around for centuries but as yet no consensus \\nexists as to its significance for atheism or theism. After a brief historical \\nreview, I focus on the debate between two leading contemporary philosophers, \\nRowe and Plantinga, and argue that neither has succeeded in resolving the \\nevidential version of the problem of evil. It is time to turn from the \\ntheological issue to practical issues about pointless suffering. Using a common \\nsense approach, I argue that there are countless cases of pointless suffering \\nand that they deserve our undivided attention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open journal of philosophy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open journal of philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJPP.2021.112023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open journal of philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJPP.2021.112023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The problem of evil has been around for centuries but as yet no consensus
exists as to its significance for atheism or theism. After a brief historical
review, I focus on the debate between two leading contemporary philosophers,
Rowe and Plantinga, and argue that neither has succeeded in resolving the
evidential version of the problem of evil. It is time to turn from the
theological issue to practical issues about pointless suffering. Using a common
sense approach, I argue that there are countless cases of pointless suffering
and that they deserve our undivided attention.