栓塞保护装置在头臂动脉支架置入术中的应用

A. Polkovnikov, V. Pertsov, A. Materukhin, E. Savchenko
{"title":"栓塞保护装置在头臂动脉支架置入术中的应用","authors":"A. Polkovnikov, V. Pertsov, A. Materukhin, E. Savchenko","doi":"10.26683/2304-9359-2018-2(24)-44-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective — to optimize the results of endovascular treatment of stenotic pathology of brachiocephalic arteries. \nMaterials and methods. The results of surgical treatment of 112 patients, among whom there were 79 (70.5 %) men and 33 (29.5 %) women aged from 28 to 86 years with symptomatic stenotic lesions of brachiocephalic arteries treated in the neurosurgical department of the Zaporizhzhia regional hospital in the period from 2010 to 2018 were analyzed. Observations were divided into three groups depending on the localization of the defeat: internal carotid artery — 74 (66 %) cases (predominant stenosis of the mouth of the ICA (n = 71)), vertebral artery — 25 (22.4 %), a portion of the subclavian artery or brachiocephalic trunk — 13 (11.6 %). All patients underwent MRI of the brain in the preoperative period, as well as in 45 (40 %) cases of CTangiography. In all cases prior to surgery invasive angiography was performed with an assessment of the state and anatomy of the brachiocephalic and intracranial arteries, as well as the possibilities of collateral blood flow. \nResults. In the first group, which was conducted carotid stenting embolic protection device was used in 72 (97.2 %) cases. In the second group, distal protection device were used twice 2 (8 %) in the resolution of extended stenoses of the dominant vertebral artery mouth. In the third group, the distal protection device was used in 1 (7.7 %) case for stenting the critical extended stenosis of the brachiocephalic trunk with the transition to common carotid artery. Complications were noted in 9 observations. In one case there was a development of ischemic stroke, intraoperatively, in a patient with an echeloned lesion of the intracranial basin of a stenting internal carotid artery, probably against a background of hypotension of the stent developed during implantation. In 8 (7.1 %) cases the formation of the hematoma of the puncture site of the femoral artery was noted. \nConclusions. The use of embolic protection device is mandatory in standard carotid stenting. The choice of method of protection depends on the severity of stenosis, as well as the individual features of collateral blood flow. When stenting subclavian artery, brachiocephalic trunk and vertebral artery, in some cases it is justified to use distal protection devices, the latter increases the safety of the operation.","PeriodicalId":33226,"journal":{"name":"Endovaskuliarna neirorentgenokhirurgiia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of embolic protection device in the stenting of brachiocephalic arteries\",\"authors\":\"A. Polkovnikov, V. Pertsov, A. Materukhin, E. Savchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.26683/2304-9359-2018-2(24)-44-51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective — to optimize the results of endovascular treatment of stenotic pathology of brachiocephalic arteries. \\nMaterials and methods. The results of surgical treatment of 112 patients, among whom there were 79 (70.5 %) men and 33 (29.5 %) women aged from 28 to 86 years with symptomatic stenotic lesions of brachiocephalic arteries treated in the neurosurgical department of the Zaporizhzhia regional hospital in the period from 2010 to 2018 were analyzed. Observations were divided into three groups depending on the localization of the defeat: internal carotid artery — 74 (66 %) cases (predominant stenosis of the mouth of the ICA (n = 71)), vertebral artery — 25 (22.4 %), a portion of the subclavian artery or brachiocephalic trunk — 13 (11.6 %). All patients underwent MRI of the brain in the preoperative period, as well as in 45 (40 %) cases of CTangiography. In all cases prior to surgery invasive angiography was performed with an assessment of the state and anatomy of the brachiocephalic and intracranial arteries, as well as the possibilities of collateral blood flow. \\nResults. In the first group, which was conducted carotid stenting embolic protection device was used in 72 (97.2 %) cases. In the second group, distal protection device were used twice 2 (8 %) in the resolution of extended stenoses of the dominant vertebral artery mouth. In the third group, the distal protection device was used in 1 (7.7 %) case for stenting the critical extended stenosis of the brachiocephalic trunk with the transition to common carotid artery. Complications were noted in 9 observations. In one case there was a development of ischemic stroke, intraoperatively, in a patient with an echeloned lesion of the intracranial basin of a stenting internal carotid artery, probably against a background of hypotension of the stent developed during implantation. In 8 (7.1 %) cases the formation of the hematoma of the puncture site of the femoral artery was noted. \\nConclusions. The use of embolic protection device is mandatory in standard carotid stenting. The choice of method of protection depends on the severity of stenosis, as well as the individual features of collateral blood flow. When stenting subclavian artery, brachiocephalic trunk and vertebral artery, in some cases it is justified to use distal protection devices, the latter increases the safety of the operation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endovaskuliarna neirorentgenokhirurgiia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endovaskuliarna neirorentgenokhirurgiia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26683/2304-9359-2018-2(24)-44-51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endovaskuliarna neirorentgenokhirurgiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26683/2304-9359-2018-2(24)-44-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:优化血管内治疗头臂动脉狭窄病变的效果。材料和方法。分析2010 - 2018年在该地区医院神经外科收治的112例有症状性头臂动脉狭窄病变患者的手术治疗结果,其中男性79例(70.5%),女性33例(29.5%),年龄28 ~ 86岁。观察结果根据失败的定位分为三组:颈内动脉- 74例(66%)(主要是ICA口狭窄(n = 71)),椎动脉- 25例(22.4%),部分锁骨下动脉或头臂干- 13例(11.6%)。所有患者术前均行脑MRI检查,其中45例(40%)行ct扫描。所有病例术前均行侵入性血管造影,评估头臂动脉和颅内动脉的状态和解剖结构,以及侧支血流的可能性。结果。第一组采用颈动脉支架植入术,72例(97.2%)采用栓塞保护装置。第二组使用远端保护装置2次(8%)解决优势椎动脉口扩大狭窄。第三组1例(7.7%)采用远端保护装置对过渡至颈总动脉的头臂干危重扩展狭窄进行支架置入。9例观察到并发症。在一个病例中,有一个缺血性中风的发展,在手术中,在一个病人的颈内动脉支架的颅内盆地的阶梯式病变,可能是对背景的低血压的支架植入过程中发展。在8例(7.1%)病例中发现股动脉穿刺部位形成血肿。结论。标准颈动脉支架植入术中必须使用栓塞保护装置。保护方法的选择取决于狭窄的严重程度,以及侧支血流的个体特征。当支架置入锁骨下动脉、头臂干和椎动脉时,在某些情况下使用远端保护装置是合理的,后者增加了手术的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of embolic protection device in the stenting of brachiocephalic arteries
Objective — to optimize the results of endovascular treatment of stenotic pathology of brachiocephalic arteries. Materials and methods. The results of surgical treatment of 112 patients, among whom there were 79 (70.5 %) men and 33 (29.5 %) women aged from 28 to 86 years with symptomatic stenotic lesions of brachiocephalic arteries treated in the neurosurgical department of the Zaporizhzhia regional hospital in the period from 2010 to 2018 were analyzed. Observations were divided into three groups depending on the localization of the defeat: internal carotid artery — 74 (66 %) cases (predominant stenosis of the mouth of the ICA (n = 71)), vertebral artery — 25 (22.4 %), a portion of the subclavian artery or brachiocephalic trunk — 13 (11.6 %). All patients underwent MRI of the brain in the preoperative period, as well as in 45 (40 %) cases of CTangiography. In all cases prior to surgery invasive angiography was performed with an assessment of the state and anatomy of the brachiocephalic and intracranial arteries, as well as the possibilities of collateral blood flow. Results. In the first group, which was conducted carotid stenting embolic protection device was used in 72 (97.2 %) cases. In the second group, distal protection device were used twice 2 (8 %) in the resolution of extended stenoses of the dominant vertebral artery mouth. In the third group, the distal protection device was used in 1 (7.7 %) case for stenting the critical extended stenosis of the brachiocephalic trunk with the transition to common carotid artery. Complications were noted in 9 observations. In one case there was a development of ischemic stroke, intraoperatively, in a patient with an echeloned lesion of the intracranial basin of a stenting internal carotid artery, probably against a background of hypotension of the stent developed during implantation. In 8 (7.1 %) cases the formation of the hematoma of the puncture site of the femoral artery was noted. Conclusions. The use of embolic protection device is mandatory in standard carotid stenting. The choice of method of protection depends on the severity of stenosis, as well as the individual features of collateral blood flow. When stenting subclavian artery, brachiocephalic trunk and vertebral artery, in some cases it is justified to use distal protection devices, the latter increases the safety of the operation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信