有限接触动力加压钢板加交锁髓内钉治疗成人肱骨骨折的疗效

V. D’almeida, A. Kamath, Akhil Joseph, Alfred Lobo, T. Pinto
{"title":"有限接触动力加压钢板加交锁髓内钉治疗成人肱骨骨折的疗效","authors":"V. D’almeida, A. Kamath, Akhil Joseph, Alfred Lobo, T. Pinto","doi":"10.4103/mjmsr.mjmsr_19_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Fractures of shaft of humerus are common, accounting 3% of all fractures. They have historically been managed conservatively with hanging casts or a functional brace. However, a lack of fracture reduction with these conservative measures resulted in malunion. Two surgical techniques under study include intramedullary nailing and limited contact dynamic compression plating. This study aims to analyze the functional outcome between the two surgical techniques. Materials and Methods: In this prospective randomized study, 38 patients were treated surgically for shaft of humerus fracture from August 2016 to August 2018 at a tertiary care center. Twenty patients underwent limited contact dynamic compression plate (LCDCP) plating and 18 underwent intramedullary nailing. All were assessed for radiological union, complications, and functional outcome at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 1 year using disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire. Results: Thirty-eight patients completed the study of which 18 cases (47.5%) with fractures that were treated with interlocking nail and 20 cases that were treated with LCDCP plating. The mean duration to complete radiological healing was 15.06 weeks. The healing rate was relatively faster in the interlocking group as compared to the LCDCP group (P = 0.144). Complications such as shoulder impingement 8 (44.4%), shoulder pain 3 (16.7%), nonunion 1 (5.6%), and shoulder stiffness 1 (5.6%) were found to be more common in interlocking group as compared to LCDCP group, respectively. Whereas, complications such as superficial infection - 1(5%) and radial nerve deficits - 2(10%) were less common in the interlocking group compared to LCDCP group, respectively. The mean follow-up was 11.556 weeks, and the overall DASH score analysis showed better results in LCDCP group. Conclusion: In our study, LCDCP plating showed lower incidence of complications, particularly periarticular complications around the shoulder joint such as shoulder pain, stiffness, and impingement but carried a higher risk of radial nerve injury. Fracture union rates were found to be almost similar between both groups. DASH score analysis showed better functional outcome among the LCDCP plating group. The overall outcome of LCDCP plating over interlocking nailing was found to be better.","PeriodicalId":19108,"journal":{"name":"Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional outcome of limited contact dynamic compression plating and interlocking nailing for fracture shaft of humerus in adults\",\"authors\":\"V. D’almeida, A. Kamath, Akhil Joseph, Alfred Lobo, T. Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/mjmsr.mjmsr_19_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Fractures of shaft of humerus are common, accounting 3% of all fractures. They have historically been managed conservatively with hanging casts or a functional brace. However, a lack of fracture reduction with these conservative measures resulted in malunion. Two surgical techniques under study include intramedullary nailing and limited contact dynamic compression plating. This study aims to analyze the functional outcome between the two surgical techniques. Materials and Methods: In this prospective randomized study, 38 patients were treated surgically for shaft of humerus fracture from August 2016 to August 2018 at a tertiary care center. Twenty patients underwent limited contact dynamic compression plate (LCDCP) plating and 18 underwent intramedullary nailing. All were assessed for radiological union, complications, and functional outcome at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 1 year using disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire. Results: Thirty-eight patients completed the study of which 18 cases (47.5%) with fractures that were treated with interlocking nail and 20 cases that were treated with LCDCP plating. The mean duration to complete radiological healing was 15.06 weeks. The healing rate was relatively faster in the interlocking group as compared to the LCDCP group (P = 0.144). Complications such as shoulder impingement 8 (44.4%), shoulder pain 3 (16.7%), nonunion 1 (5.6%), and shoulder stiffness 1 (5.6%) were found to be more common in interlocking group as compared to LCDCP group, respectively. Whereas, complications such as superficial infection - 1(5%) and radial nerve deficits - 2(10%) were less common in the interlocking group compared to LCDCP group, respectively. The mean follow-up was 11.556 weeks, and the overall DASH score analysis showed better results in LCDCP group. Conclusion: In our study, LCDCP plating showed lower incidence of complications, particularly periarticular complications around the shoulder joint such as shoulder pain, stiffness, and impingement but carried a higher risk of radial nerve injury. Fracture union rates were found to be almost similar between both groups. DASH score analysis showed better functional outcome among the LCDCP plating group. The overall outcome of LCDCP plating over interlocking nailing was found to be better.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/mjmsr.mjmsr_19_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/mjmsr.mjmsr_19_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肱骨干骨折较为常见,占所有骨折的3%。他们一直保守地用悬挂式石膏或功能性支架来管理。然而,这些保守措施缺乏骨折复位导致骨不愈合。目前正在研究的两种手术技术包括髓内钉和有限接触动态加压钢板。本研究旨在分析两种手术方式的功能预后。材料与方法:在这项前瞻性随机研究中,2016年8月至2018年8月,38例肱骨轴骨折患者在三级医疗中心接受手术治疗。20例患者行有限接触动态加压钢板(LCDCP)电镀,18例行髓内钉。所有患者在6周、12周和1年使用臂、肩和手残疾(DASH)问卷时评估放射学愈合、并发症和功能结局。结果:38例患者完成研究,其中交锁钉治疗18例(47.5%)骨折,LCDCP钢板治疗20例。平均放射治疗愈合时间为15.06周。与LCDCP组相比,联锁组的愈合速度相对较快(P = 0.144)。与LCDCP组相比,联锁组的并发症如肩关节撞击8(44.4%)、肩关节疼痛3(16.7%)、不愈合1(5.6%)和肩关节僵硬1(5.6%)更常见。然而,与LCDCP组相比,联锁组的并发症如浅表感染- 1(5%)和桡神经缺损- 2(10%)分别较少见。平均随访时间为11.556周,综合DASH评分分析显示LCDCP组效果较好。结论:在我们的研究中,LCDCP电镀的并发症发生率较低,尤其是肩关节周围的关节周围并发症,如肩部疼痛、僵硬和撞击,但桡神经损伤的风险较高。两组骨折愈合率几乎相同。DASH评分分析显示,LCDCP组功能预后较好。结果发现,LCDCP电镀优于联锁钉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional outcome of limited contact dynamic compression plating and interlocking nailing for fracture shaft of humerus in adults
Background: Fractures of shaft of humerus are common, accounting 3% of all fractures. They have historically been managed conservatively with hanging casts or a functional brace. However, a lack of fracture reduction with these conservative measures resulted in malunion. Two surgical techniques under study include intramedullary nailing and limited contact dynamic compression plating. This study aims to analyze the functional outcome between the two surgical techniques. Materials and Methods: In this prospective randomized study, 38 patients were treated surgically for shaft of humerus fracture from August 2016 to August 2018 at a tertiary care center. Twenty patients underwent limited contact dynamic compression plate (LCDCP) plating and 18 underwent intramedullary nailing. All were assessed for radiological union, complications, and functional outcome at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 1 year using disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire. Results: Thirty-eight patients completed the study of which 18 cases (47.5%) with fractures that were treated with interlocking nail and 20 cases that were treated with LCDCP plating. The mean duration to complete radiological healing was 15.06 weeks. The healing rate was relatively faster in the interlocking group as compared to the LCDCP group (P = 0.144). Complications such as shoulder impingement 8 (44.4%), shoulder pain 3 (16.7%), nonunion 1 (5.6%), and shoulder stiffness 1 (5.6%) were found to be more common in interlocking group as compared to LCDCP group, respectively. Whereas, complications such as superficial infection - 1(5%) and radial nerve deficits - 2(10%) were less common in the interlocking group compared to LCDCP group, respectively. The mean follow-up was 11.556 weeks, and the overall DASH score analysis showed better results in LCDCP group. Conclusion: In our study, LCDCP plating showed lower incidence of complications, particularly periarticular complications around the shoulder joint such as shoulder pain, stiffness, and impingement but carried a higher risk of radial nerve injury. Fracture union rates were found to be almost similar between both groups. DASH score analysis showed better functional outcome among the LCDCP plating group. The overall outcome of LCDCP plating over interlocking nailing was found to be better.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信