序列抽样风险比的固定宽度置信限

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
Hokwon A. Cho, Zhou Wang
{"title":"序列抽样风险比的固定宽度置信限","authors":"Hokwon A. Cho, Zhou Wang","doi":"10.1080/01966324.2019.1679301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Synoptic Abstract A sequential method is presented for determining confidence intervals of fixed-width and corresponding optimal sample sizes for the risk ratio of probabilities of the two independent binomial variates. In general, since the ratio estimators are biased and asymmetrical, corrections must be made when they are used in practice. We suggest to use a bias-correction term for modification to the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) to develop the procedure. In addition, we study the following desirable properties of the estimator: Unbiasedness, efficiency in variance, and normality. First-order asymptotic expansions are obtained to investigate large-sample properties of the proposed procedure. Monte Carlo experiment is carried out for various scenarios of samples for examining the finite sample behavior. Through illustrations, we compare these performance of the proposed methods, Wald-based confidence intervals with the likelihood-based confidence intervals in light of invariance, length and sample sizes.","PeriodicalId":35850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences","volume":"39 1","pages":"166 - 181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01966324.2019.1679301","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Fixed-Width Confidence Limits for the Risk Ratio with Sequential Sampling\",\"authors\":\"Hokwon A. Cho, Zhou Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01966324.2019.1679301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Synoptic Abstract A sequential method is presented for determining confidence intervals of fixed-width and corresponding optimal sample sizes for the risk ratio of probabilities of the two independent binomial variates. In general, since the ratio estimators are biased and asymmetrical, corrections must be made when they are used in practice. We suggest to use a bias-correction term for modification to the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) to develop the procedure. In addition, we study the following desirable properties of the estimator: Unbiasedness, efficiency in variance, and normality. First-order asymptotic expansions are obtained to investigate large-sample properties of the proposed procedure. Monte Carlo experiment is carried out for various scenarios of samples for examining the finite sample behavior. Through illustrations, we compare these performance of the proposed methods, Wald-based confidence intervals with the likelihood-based confidence intervals in light of invariance, length and sample sizes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"166 - 181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01966324.2019.1679301\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01966324.2019.1679301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01966324.2019.1679301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要针对两个独立二项变量的概率风险比,提出了一种确定固定宽度置信区间和相应最优样本量的序列方法。一般来说,由于比率估计量是有偏的和不对称的,在实践中使用时必须进行校正。我们建议使用偏差校正项来修改最大似然估计量(MLE),以开发该程序。此外,我们还研究了估计器的以下理想性质:无偏性、方差有效性和正态性。获得了一阶渐近展开式来研究所提出程序的大样本性质。蒙特卡罗实验针对不同的样本场景进行,以检验有限样本的行为。通过举例,我们从不变性、长度和样本量的角度比较了所提出的方法的这些性能,即基于Wald的置信区间和基于似然的置信区间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Fixed-Width Confidence Limits for the Risk Ratio with Sequential Sampling
Synoptic Abstract A sequential method is presented for determining confidence intervals of fixed-width and corresponding optimal sample sizes for the risk ratio of probabilities of the two independent binomial variates. In general, since the ratio estimators are biased and asymmetrical, corrections must be made when they are used in practice. We suggest to use a bias-correction term for modification to the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) to develop the procedure. In addition, we study the following desirable properties of the estimator: Unbiasedness, efficiency in variance, and normality. First-order asymptotic expansions are obtained to investigate large-sample properties of the proposed procedure. Monte Carlo experiment is carried out for various scenarios of samples for examining the finite sample behavior. Through illustrations, we compare these performance of the proposed methods, Wald-based confidence intervals with the likelihood-based confidence intervals in light of invariance, length and sample sizes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences
American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信