影响初级保健临床医生对女性尿路感染的诊断、治疗和管理的知识和态度因素:英国一项定性的“大声思考”研究

Angela Kabulo Mwape, K. Schmidtke, Celia A Brown
{"title":"影响初级保健临床医生对女性尿路感染的诊断、治疗和管理的知识和态度因素:英国一项定性的“大声思考”研究","authors":"Angela Kabulo Mwape, K. Schmidtke, Celia A Brown","doi":"10.1002/rfc2.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aimed to identify factors related to knowledge and attitudes that influence primary care clinicians' decision‐making when diagnosing, treating, and managing suspected urinary tract infections (UTIs) in women. Understanding the factors that influence clinicians' decision‐making is important for maximising health outcomes in women and reducing suboptimal use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance.A qualitative think‐aloud study design was employed.Semi‐structured qualitative interviews were conducted with primary care clinicians in England over Microsoft Teams. Interviews were transcribed and coded in two ways. First, clinicians' responses for each scenario were coded as either following (optimal), not following evidence‐based national guideline or incorrectly citing certain diagnosis, treatment, and management procedures (suboptimal). Second, the knowledge and attitude factors that influenced decision‐making were coded according to an empirically informed umbrella framework. Clinicians external to the study team reviewed the findings to promote their trustworthiness and utility.Ten clinicians (six female) took part. Clinicians prescribing decisions were mostly influenced by knowledge rather than attitude factors. Despite clinicians expressing high awareness of relevant evidence‐based guidelines (a knowledge factor) and high confidence (an attitude factor), more than half of their decisions (60%) were suboptimal in some way thereby impacting women's health. Most clinicians relied on their experiential knowledge rather than using evidence‐based guidelines. Our results suggest that knowledge could impede adherence, for example, where local guidelines conflict with national guidelines of when to perform a urine dipstick test.Suboptimal prescribing decisions could result from a combination of different knowledge and attitude factors leading to negative outcomes in women's health such as inappropriate treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in women over 65 years old. To optimise antibiotic prescribing in women, policy‐level interventions could increase concordance across local and national guidelines, or more tailored individual‐level interventions could help clinicians recognise where their experiential knowledge causes deviations from evidence‐based guidelines when diagnosing, treating and managing UTIs.","PeriodicalId":74669,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive, female and child health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge and attitude factors influencing primary care clinicians' diagnosis, treatment and management of urinary tract infections in women: A qualitative ‘think’ aloud study in England\",\"authors\":\"Angela Kabulo Mwape, K. Schmidtke, Celia A Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/rfc2.52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study aimed to identify factors related to knowledge and attitudes that influence primary care clinicians' decision‐making when diagnosing, treating, and managing suspected urinary tract infections (UTIs) in women. Understanding the factors that influence clinicians' decision‐making is important for maximising health outcomes in women and reducing suboptimal use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance.A qualitative think‐aloud study design was employed.Semi‐structured qualitative interviews were conducted with primary care clinicians in England over Microsoft Teams. Interviews were transcribed and coded in two ways. First, clinicians' responses for each scenario were coded as either following (optimal), not following evidence‐based national guideline or incorrectly citing certain diagnosis, treatment, and management procedures (suboptimal). Second, the knowledge and attitude factors that influenced decision‐making were coded according to an empirically informed umbrella framework. Clinicians external to the study team reviewed the findings to promote their trustworthiness and utility.Ten clinicians (six female) took part. Clinicians prescribing decisions were mostly influenced by knowledge rather than attitude factors. Despite clinicians expressing high awareness of relevant evidence‐based guidelines (a knowledge factor) and high confidence (an attitude factor), more than half of their decisions (60%) were suboptimal in some way thereby impacting women's health. Most clinicians relied on their experiential knowledge rather than using evidence‐based guidelines. Our results suggest that knowledge could impede adherence, for example, where local guidelines conflict with national guidelines of when to perform a urine dipstick test.Suboptimal prescribing decisions could result from a combination of different knowledge and attitude factors leading to negative outcomes in women's health such as inappropriate treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in women over 65 years old. To optimise antibiotic prescribing in women, policy‐level interventions could increase concordance across local and national guidelines, or more tailored individual‐level interventions could help clinicians recognise where their experiential knowledge causes deviations from evidence‐based guidelines when diagnosing, treating and managing UTIs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive, female and child health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive, female and child health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/rfc2.52\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive, female and child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rfc2.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定影响初级保健临床医生在诊断、治疗和管理女性疑似尿路感染(uti)时决策的相关知识和态度因素。了解影响临床医生决策的因素对于最大限度地提高妇女的健康结果和减少抗生素的次优使用和抗菌素耐药性非常重要。采用定性的有声思考研究设计。半结构化的定性访谈在英国的初级保健临床医生在微软团队进行。采访以两种方式记录和编码。首先,临床医生对每种情况的反应被编码为要么遵循(最佳),要么不遵循基于证据的国家指南,要么错误地引用某些诊断、治疗和管理程序(次优)。其次,影响决策的知识和态度因素根据经验知情的伞形框架进行编码。研究小组外的临床医生审查了研究结果,以提高其可信度和实用性。10名临床医生(6名女性)参与了研究。临床医生的处方决策主要受知识因素而不是态度因素的影响。尽管临床医生表达了对相关循证指南的高度认识(知识因素)和高度信心(态度因素),但他们一半以上的决定(60%)在某种程度上是次优的,从而影响了妇女的健康。大多数临床医生依赖于他们的经验知识,而不是使用基于证据的指南。我们的研究结果表明,知识可能会阻碍依从性,例如,当地方指南与国家指南在何时进行尿试纸测试时发生冲突时。不同的知识和态度因素的组合可能导致不理想的处方决定,从而导致妇女健康的负面结果,例如对65岁以上妇女无症状细菌性尿症的不适当治疗。为了优化妇女的抗生素处方,政策层面的干预措施可以增加地方和国家指南之间的一致性,或者更量身定制的个人层面的干预措施可以帮助临床医生认识到,在诊断、治疗和管理uti时,他们的经验知识在哪里导致了与循证指南的偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge and attitude factors influencing primary care clinicians' diagnosis, treatment and management of urinary tract infections in women: A qualitative ‘think’ aloud study in England
The present study aimed to identify factors related to knowledge and attitudes that influence primary care clinicians' decision‐making when diagnosing, treating, and managing suspected urinary tract infections (UTIs) in women. Understanding the factors that influence clinicians' decision‐making is important for maximising health outcomes in women and reducing suboptimal use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance.A qualitative think‐aloud study design was employed.Semi‐structured qualitative interviews were conducted with primary care clinicians in England over Microsoft Teams. Interviews were transcribed and coded in two ways. First, clinicians' responses for each scenario were coded as either following (optimal), not following evidence‐based national guideline or incorrectly citing certain diagnosis, treatment, and management procedures (suboptimal). Second, the knowledge and attitude factors that influenced decision‐making were coded according to an empirically informed umbrella framework. Clinicians external to the study team reviewed the findings to promote their trustworthiness and utility.Ten clinicians (six female) took part. Clinicians prescribing decisions were mostly influenced by knowledge rather than attitude factors. Despite clinicians expressing high awareness of relevant evidence‐based guidelines (a knowledge factor) and high confidence (an attitude factor), more than half of their decisions (60%) were suboptimal in some way thereby impacting women's health. Most clinicians relied on their experiential knowledge rather than using evidence‐based guidelines. Our results suggest that knowledge could impede adherence, for example, where local guidelines conflict with national guidelines of when to perform a urine dipstick test.Suboptimal prescribing decisions could result from a combination of different knowledge and attitude factors leading to negative outcomes in women's health such as inappropriate treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in women over 65 years old. To optimise antibiotic prescribing in women, policy‐level interventions could increase concordance across local and national guidelines, or more tailored individual‐level interventions could help clinicians recognise where their experiential knowledge causes deviations from evidence‐based guidelines when diagnosing, treating and managing UTIs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信