三级医院老年血管病患者的老年综合评估

IF 0.4 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Christine Shi Min Chau, Huimin Lin, Fuyin Li, Sigaya Kenneth Villan
{"title":"三级医院老年血管病患者的老年综合评估","authors":"Christine Shi Min Chau, Huimin Lin, Fuyin Li, Sigaya Kenneth Villan","doi":"10.1177/20101058231192781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a validated multidomain assessment of an older person’s myriad issues that has shown positive medical outcomes in surgical settings. However, there is paucity of evidence in older Vascular inpatients. To determine if a Geriatric Liaison Service using CGA improves medical outcomes in older Vascular inpatients in Singapore. This is a quality improvement prospective cross-sectional study. Vascular patients aged ≥65 years admitted between November 2018 to October 2019 were referred to the Vascular-Geriatric Service (VGS) at the surgeon’s discretion if they had acute medical issues, cognitive concerns, or functional decline. Patients admitted under Vascular Surgery during the preceding year but not referred to VGS were used as control. A pre- and post-analysis was conducted for outcomes of medical complications, while a multivariate analysis was done to look at LOS, 30-day unplanned medical readmissions and 30-day mortality rates. Patients had significantly lower rates of pneumonia (2.2% vs 10.8%, p = .021) and delirium (1.1% vs 18.3%, p < .001) post-VGS compared to pre-VGS. VGS decreased the odds of 30-day mortality by 79% as compared to the control group (OR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.05-0.86, p = .030). The intervention group had increased risk of a longer hospital stay by 48% as compared to control (RR: 1.48 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.97, p = .008). VGS was associated with reduction in some medical complications, and 30-day mortality in older frail Vascular inpatients with multimorbidity.","PeriodicalId":44685,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive geriatric assessment in older vascular patients in a tertiary hospital\",\"authors\":\"Christine Shi Min Chau, Huimin Lin, Fuyin Li, Sigaya Kenneth Villan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20101058231192781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a validated multidomain assessment of an older person’s myriad issues that has shown positive medical outcomes in surgical settings. However, there is paucity of evidence in older Vascular inpatients. To determine if a Geriatric Liaison Service using CGA improves medical outcomes in older Vascular inpatients in Singapore. This is a quality improvement prospective cross-sectional study. Vascular patients aged ≥65 years admitted between November 2018 to October 2019 were referred to the Vascular-Geriatric Service (VGS) at the surgeon’s discretion if they had acute medical issues, cognitive concerns, or functional decline. Patients admitted under Vascular Surgery during the preceding year but not referred to VGS were used as control. A pre- and post-analysis was conducted for outcomes of medical complications, while a multivariate analysis was done to look at LOS, 30-day unplanned medical readmissions and 30-day mortality rates. Patients had significantly lower rates of pneumonia (2.2% vs 10.8%, p = .021) and delirium (1.1% vs 18.3%, p < .001) post-VGS compared to pre-VGS. VGS decreased the odds of 30-day mortality by 79% as compared to the control group (OR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.05-0.86, p = .030). The intervention group had increased risk of a longer hospital stay by 48% as compared to control (RR: 1.48 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.97, p = .008). VGS was associated with reduction in some medical complications, and 30-day mortality in older frail Vascular inpatients with multimorbidity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20101058231192781\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20101058231192781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综合老年评估(CGA)是一种对老年人无数问题的有效多领域评估,在手术环境中显示出积极的医疗结果。然而,在老年血管性住院患者中缺乏证据。确定使用CGA的老年联络服务是否能改善新加坡老年血管病住院患者的医疗结果。这是一项质量改进前瞻性横断面研究。2018年11月至2019年10月期间入院的年龄≥65岁的血管患者,如果他们有急性医疗问题、认知问题或功能下降,则由外科医生酌情转诊至血管老年服务中心(VGS)。前一年接受血管外科手术但未转诊至VGS的患者被用作对照。对医疗并发症的结果进行了前后分析,同时对LOS、30天计划外医疗再入院和30天死亡率进行了多变量分析。与VGS前相比,VGS后患者的肺炎发生率(2.2%对10.8%,p=0.021)和谵妄发生率(1.1%对18.3%,p<0.01)显著降低。与对照组相比,VGS将30天死亡率降低了79%(OR=0.21,95%CI:0.05-0.86,p=0.030)。与对照组比较,干预组住院时间更长的风险增加了48%(RR:1.48,95%CI:1.11至1.97,p=0.008),以及患有多种疾病的老年体弱血管性住院患者的30天死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprehensive geriatric assessment in older vascular patients in a tertiary hospital
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a validated multidomain assessment of an older person’s myriad issues that has shown positive medical outcomes in surgical settings. However, there is paucity of evidence in older Vascular inpatients. To determine if a Geriatric Liaison Service using CGA improves medical outcomes in older Vascular inpatients in Singapore. This is a quality improvement prospective cross-sectional study. Vascular patients aged ≥65 years admitted between November 2018 to October 2019 were referred to the Vascular-Geriatric Service (VGS) at the surgeon’s discretion if they had acute medical issues, cognitive concerns, or functional decline. Patients admitted under Vascular Surgery during the preceding year but not referred to VGS were used as control. A pre- and post-analysis was conducted for outcomes of medical complications, while a multivariate analysis was done to look at LOS, 30-day unplanned medical readmissions and 30-day mortality rates. Patients had significantly lower rates of pneumonia (2.2% vs 10.8%, p = .021) and delirium (1.1% vs 18.3%, p < .001) post-VGS compared to pre-VGS. VGS decreased the odds of 30-day mortality by 79% as compared to the control group (OR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.05-0.86, p = .030). The intervention group had increased risk of a longer hospital stay by 48% as compared to control (RR: 1.48 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.97, p = .008). VGS was associated with reduction in some medical complications, and 30-day mortality in older frail Vascular inpatients with multimorbidity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare
Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信