福利法律教育:设计、实施和评估

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
E. Jones, Caroline Strevens
{"title":"福利法律教育:设计、实施和评估","authors":"E. Jones, Caroline Strevens","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2022.2033494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past five or so years, it has become almost trite to refer to the significant wellbeing issues which arise within higher education among both the student body generally and law students in particular. In the UK, the increasing acknowledgement of these issues is demonstrated by the publication of the Universities UK Step Change: Mentally Healthy Universities Framework and the University Mental Health Charter. Both of these advocate a “whole university” approach to wellbeing, viewing wellbeing as fundamental to all aspects of university life, not just those traditionally viewed as pastoral in nature. The starting point for this special issue is that it is vital for law schools to adjust to this “whole university” approach in the way they design, deliver and evaluate their teaching, foster learning, interact with their students and facilitate their students’ experience. Whilst mental health, wellbeing and other pastoral services have a crucial role to play in higher education, they are not sufficient on their own. Neither are generic central policies and processes for recognition of wellbeing as a curricular matter. An effective “whole university” approach also requires each individual school and department to consider how to acknowledge the value of wellbeing and integrate it into the curriculum in an evidence-based and sustainable manner appropriate to their discipline. For law schools in particular, there is a rich body of international evidence demonstrating that the culture, norms and approaches common in legal studies can be potentially harmful to student wellbeing. As a result there is a strong ethical imperative upon them to address their role in this as part of implementing such a “whole university” approach. Given the bi-directional relationship between wellbeing and","PeriodicalId":44936,"journal":{"name":"Law Teacher","volume":"56 1","pages":"1 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal education for wellbeing: design, delivery and evaluation\",\"authors\":\"E. Jones, Caroline Strevens\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03069400.2022.2033494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the past five or so years, it has become almost trite to refer to the significant wellbeing issues which arise within higher education among both the student body generally and law students in particular. In the UK, the increasing acknowledgement of these issues is demonstrated by the publication of the Universities UK Step Change: Mentally Healthy Universities Framework and the University Mental Health Charter. Both of these advocate a “whole university” approach to wellbeing, viewing wellbeing as fundamental to all aspects of university life, not just those traditionally viewed as pastoral in nature. The starting point for this special issue is that it is vital for law schools to adjust to this “whole university” approach in the way they design, deliver and evaluate their teaching, foster learning, interact with their students and facilitate their students’ experience. Whilst mental health, wellbeing and other pastoral services have a crucial role to play in higher education, they are not sufficient on their own. Neither are generic central policies and processes for recognition of wellbeing as a curricular matter. An effective “whole university” approach also requires each individual school and department to consider how to acknowledge the value of wellbeing and integrate it into the curriculum in an evidence-based and sustainable manner appropriate to their discipline. For law schools in particular, there is a rich body of international evidence demonstrating that the culture, norms and approaches common in legal studies can be potentially harmful to student wellbeing. As a result there is a strong ethical imperative upon them to address their role in this as part of implementing such a “whole university” approach. Given the bi-directional relationship between wellbeing and\",\"PeriodicalId\":44936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law Teacher\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2022.2033494\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2022.2033494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在过去五年左右的时间里,提及高等教育中出现的学生群体,尤其是法律专业学生的重大幸福问题,几乎已经变得老生常谈。在英国,《英国大学变革:心理健康大学框架》和《大学心理健康宪章》的出版表明,人们越来越认识到这些问题。这两人都提倡“整个大学”的幸福观,将幸福视为大学生活各个方面的基础,而不仅仅是那些传统上被视为田园性质的人。这期特刊的出发点是,法学院在设计、交付和评估教学、促进学习、与学生互动以及促进学生体验方面,必须适应这种“全大学”的方法。虽然心理健康、福利和其他牧业服务在高等教育中发挥着至关重要的作用,但仅靠它们是不够的。两者都不是将福祉作为课程事项加以承认的一般性中央政策和程序。有效的“整所大学”方法还要求每个学校和部门考虑如何承认幸福感的价值,并以适合其学科的循证和可持续的方式将其纳入课程。特别是对于法学院来说,有大量国际证据表明,法律研究中常见的文化、规范和方法可能对学生的健康有害。因此,作为实施这种“整所大学”方法的一部分,他们有强烈的道德义务来解决自己在这方面的角色。考虑到幸福感和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal education for wellbeing: design, delivery and evaluation
Over the past five or so years, it has become almost trite to refer to the significant wellbeing issues which arise within higher education among both the student body generally and law students in particular. In the UK, the increasing acknowledgement of these issues is demonstrated by the publication of the Universities UK Step Change: Mentally Healthy Universities Framework and the University Mental Health Charter. Both of these advocate a “whole university” approach to wellbeing, viewing wellbeing as fundamental to all aspects of university life, not just those traditionally viewed as pastoral in nature. The starting point for this special issue is that it is vital for law schools to adjust to this “whole university” approach in the way they design, deliver and evaluate their teaching, foster learning, interact with their students and facilitate their students’ experience. Whilst mental health, wellbeing and other pastoral services have a crucial role to play in higher education, they are not sufficient on their own. Neither are generic central policies and processes for recognition of wellbeing as a curricular matter. An effective “whole university” approach also requires each individual school and department to consider how to acknowledge the value of wellbeing and integrate it into the curriculum in an evidence-based and sustainable manner appropriate to their discipline. For law schools in particular, there is a rich body of international evidence demonstrating that the culture, norms and approaches common in legal studies can be potentially harmful to student wellbeing. As a result there is a strong ethical imperative upon them to address their role in this as part of implementing such a “whole university” approach. Given the bi-directional relationship between wellbeing and
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Law Teacher
Law Teacher EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信