超越人类的双年展

IF 0.2 3区 艺术学 0 ART
Paula Burleigh
{"title":"超越人类的双年展","authors":"Paula Burleigh","doi":"10.1080/00043249.2022.2133312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nearly every review of the Fifty-Ninth Venice Biennale cites its most impressive statistic: of the 217 artists participating in curator Cecilia Alemani’s international exhibition The Milk of Dreams, approximately 90 percent identify as women or gender nonconforming. This overwhelming majority enacts a radical reversal of the biennale’s statistical history, in which women’s contributions have typically hovered around 30 percent at best. Gender parity was only achieved in the most recent, 2019 biennale, with women-identifying individuals comprising 53 percent of artists in the central exhibition. The Milk of Dreams amounts to an intriguing course correction that signals not only new directions in contemporary art but reframes art history through alternative and gendered perspectives. I join the chorus of praise for Alemani’s exhibition, and I would add that there are other important representations afoot here. While some may (pejoratively) call this a “women’s biennale,” it is also (exuberantly) an exhibition of nonhuman actors: animals, plants, creatures, monsters, and cyborgs. In statements and interviews, Alemani has articulated her goal to illuminate the porous boundaries between human, animal, plant, and other nonhuman entities, in order to address such questions as “[W]hat are our responsibilities towards the planet, other people, and other life forms? And what would life look like without us?”1 The phrase “the milk of dreams” is taken from the title of an illustrated children’s book written and illustrated by Leonora Carrington in the 1950s. Carrington’s Milk of Dreams is a collection of tales and fables that range from darkly funny to horrifying. Most feature children and animals in concert with one another, bodies in various states of disassembly and hybridity. Heads fly off only to be reattached with chewing gum; a six-legged monstrous chihuahua woman wanders the streets bedecked in pearls. Abject images of bodily fluids and rotting meat foreground an insistently vulnerable corporeality of both human and nonhuman bodies. As cultural theorist Donna Haraway—whose influence is deeply felt in Alemani’s biennale—has succinctly written, “human beings are not in a separate compost pile.”2 Some artworks in the biennale grapple with these ideas head on: in the video Songs from the Compost: Mutating Bodies, Imploding Stars (2020) by Eglė Budvytytė (b. 1989, Vilnius, Lithuania), individuals move as though in a trance, bodies rhythmically contorting to slither, crawl, and flop in water, on lichen, and on sand, enacting the choreography of mysterious nonhuman organisms. Porous boundaries between bodies abound: in Christina Quarles’s (b. 1985, Chicago) paintings and drawings, for example, smears and drips merge already distorted bodies into one another, becoming a sexually indeterminate tangle of limbs. The global COVID-19 pandemic foregrounded our interconnectedness to nonhuman organisms, in that a virus too small for human eyes to see irrevocably changed our lives. Simultaneously, the virus galvanized a kneejerk reaction to double down on the myth of autonomy, as we desperately isolated to avoid infection. Consequently, a biennale that situates the human body in a nonhierarchical network of interspecies exchange feels at once complicated and crucial. Two initial galleries in the Central Pavilion of the Giardini illustrate the way in which the exhibition decenters the human experience and reconfigures established art histories. A monumental sculpture of an elephant by Katharina Fritsch (b. 1956, Essen, Germany) is the sole occupant of the first gallery. The hyperrealistic Elefant/Elephant (1987) stands on a pedestal, a dignified if not eerie emissary of the exhibition. While Fritsch’s sculpture is now historical—among her first forays into large-scale work in the 1980s—here it adopts a new, site-specific layer of meaning. The exhibition’s catalog entry explains that an elephant named Toni, nicknamed “the prisoner in the Giardini,” lived in the Giardini’s parkland grounds in the 1890s.3 While Fritsch renders the animal in precise detail, the skin’s green tint gestures toward the world of the inanimate— an oxidizing bronze monument, or rotting flesh. The otherworldly tint suggests not so much a triumphant return but simply that the ghostly traces of captivity remain part of our present. Following Fritsch’s sculpture—perhaps a matriarch presiding over the exhibition, given the structure of elephant social organization—the next gallery combines humancreature-machine figures by Andra Ursuţa (b. 1979, Salonta, Romania) with Rosemarie Trockel’s (b. 1952, Schwerte, Germany) giant knit monochromes. Ursuţa’s hybrids—often cast from her own body and combined with inorganic objects—draw from a range of materials, including lead crystal, glass bottles, reclaimed trash, plastic tubes, and BDSM garments. Predators ’R Us (2020) takes the form of a recumbent nude, lounging in a pose that was one of the foremost tropes in Western art history from antiquity to the nineteenth century. The figure is faceless and fragmented, with a swirling blue and orange epidermis, legs terminating in tentacled appendages inspired by the alien from the movie Predator (1987). Fragments of plants, soda bottles, and humanoid features combine to form portrait busts, all rendered in a seductively iridescent palette that conjures radioactive contaminants or sci-fi visions of extraterrestrials. Surrounding these hybrids are Trockel’s knit paintings, which build on but also subvert a venerable history of the modernist monochrome. In the hands of someone like Kazimir Malevich, the monochrome was painting reduced to its purest form, a utopian vision of an unknown future in which all contingen-","PeriodicalId":45681,"journal":{"name":"ART JOURNAL","volume":"81 1","pages":"142 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Beyond-Human Biennale\",\"authors\":\"Paula Burleigh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00043249.2022.2133312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nearly every review of the Fifty-Ninth Venice Biennale cites its most impressive statistic: of the 217 artists participating in curator Cecilia Alemani’s international exhibition The Milk of Dreams, approximately 90 percent identify as women or gender nonconforming. This overwhelming majority enacts a radical reversal of the biennale’s statistical history, in which women’s contributions have typically hovered around 30 percent at best. Gender parity was only achieved in the most recent, 2019 biennale, with women-identifying individuals comprising 53 percent of artists in the central exhibition. The Milk of Dreams amounts to an intriguing course correction that signals not only new directions in contemporary art but reframes art history through alternative and gendered perspectives. I join the chorus of praise for Alemani’s exhibition, and I would add that there are other important representations afoot here. While some may (pejoratively) call this a “women’s biennale,” it is also (exuberantly) an exhibition of nonhuman actors: animals, plants, creatures, monsters, and cyborgs. In statements and interviews, Alemani has articulated her goal to illuminate the porous boundaries between human, animal, plant, and other nonhuman entities, in order to address such questions as “[W]hat are our responsibilities towards the planet, other people, and other life forms? And what would life look like without us?”1 The phrase “the milk of dreams” is taken from the title of an illustrated children’s book written and illustrated by Leonora Carrington in the 1950s. Carrington’s Milk of Dreams is a collection of tales and fables that range from darkly funny to horrifying. Most feature children and animals in concert with one another, bodies in various states of disassembly and hybridity. Heads fly off only to be reattached with chewing gum; a six-legged monstrous chihuahua woman wanders the streets bedecked in pearls. Abject images of bodily fluids and rotting meat foreground an insistently vulnerable corporeality of both human and nonhuman bodies. As cultural theorist Donna Haraway—whose influence is deeply felt in Alemani’s biennale—has succinctly written, “human beings are not in a separate compost pile.”2 Some artworks in the biennale grapple with these ideas head on: in the video Songs from the Compost: Mutating Bodies, Imploding Stars (2020) by Eglė Budvytytė (b. 1989, Vilnius, Lithuania), individuals move as though in a trance, bodies rhythmically contorting to slither, crawl, and flop in water, on lichen, and on sand, enacting the choreography of mysterious nonhuman organisms. Porous boundaries between bodies abound: in Christina Quarles’s (b. 1985, Chicago) paintings and drawings, for example, smears and drips merge already distorted bodies into one another, becoming a sexually indeterminate tangle of limbs. The global COVID-19 pandemic foregrounded our interconnectedness to nonhuman organisms, in that a virus too small for human eyes to see irrevocably changed our lives. Simultaneously, the virus galvanized a kneejerk reaction to double down on the myth of autonomy, as we desperately isolated to avoid infection. Consequently, a biennale that situates the human body in a nonhierarchical network of interspecies exchange feels at once complicated and crucial. Two initial galleries in the Central Pavilion of the Giardini illustrate the way in which the exhibition decenters the human experience and reconfigures established art histories. A monumental sculpture of an elephant by Katharina Fritsch (b. 1956, Essen, Germany) is the sole occupant of the first gallery. The hyperrealistic Elefant/Elephant (1987) stands on a pedestal, a dignified if not eerie emissary of the exhibition. While Fritsch’s sculpture is now historical—among her first forays into large-scale work in the 1980s—here it adopts a new, site-specific layer of meaning. The exhibition’s catalog entry explains that an elephant named Toni, nicknamed “the prisoner in the Giardini,” lived in the Giardini’s parkland grounds in the 1890s.3 While Fritsch renders the animal in precise detail, the skin’s green tint gestures toward the world of the inanimate— an oxidizing bronze monument, or rotting flesh. The otherworldly tint suggests not so much a triumphant return but simply that the ghostly traces of captivity remain part of our present. Following Fritsch’s sculpture—perhaps a matriarch presiding over the exhibition, given the structure of elephant social organization—the next gallery combines humancreature-machine figures by Andra Ursuţa (b. 1979, Salonta, Romania) with Rosemarie Trockel’s (b. 1952, Schwerte, Germany) giant knit monochromes. Ursuţa’s hybrids—often cast from her own body and combined with inorganic objects—draw from a range of materials, including lead crystal, glass bottles, reclaimed trash, plastic tubes, and BDSM garments. Predators ’R Us (2020) takes the form of a recumbent nude, lounging in a pose that was one of the foremost tropes in Western art history from antiquity to the nineteenth century. The figure is faceless and fragmented, with a swirling blue and orange epidermis, legs terminating in tentacled appendages inspired by the alien from the movie Predator (1987). Fragments of plants, soda bottles, and humanoid features combine to form portrait busts, all rendered in a seductively iridescent palette that conjures radioactive contaminants or sci-fi visions of extraterrestrials. Surrounding these hybrids are Trockel’s knit paintings, which build on but also subvert a venerable history of the modernist monochrome. In the hands of someone like Kazimir Malevich, the monochrome was painting reduced to its purest form, a utopian vision of an unknown future in which all contingen-\",\"PeriodicalId\":45681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ART JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"142 - 146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ART JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1090\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043249.2022.2133312\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ART JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043249.2022.2133312","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几乎每一篇关于第59届威尼斯双年展的评论都引用了最令人印象深刻的数据:参加策展人塞西莉亚·阿莱马尼(Cecilia Alemani)国际展览《梦的牛奶》(the Milk of Dreams)的217位艺术家中,大约90%的人认为自己是女性或性别不一致。这一压倒性的优势彻底颠覆了双年展的统计历史,在这一历史中,女性的贡献通常最多徘徊在30%左右。性别平等只在最近的2019年双年展上实现,在中央展览中,女性艺术家占53%。《梦的牛奶》是一次有趣的路线修正,不仅标志着当代艺术的新方向,而且通过另类和性别视角重新构建了艺术史。我加入了对阿勒马尼展览的赞美之声,我想补充一点,这里还有其他重要的展览。虽然有些人可能(轻蔑地)称之为“女性双年展”,但它也是一场非人类演员的展览:动物、植物、生物、怪物和电子人。在声明和采访中,阿勒马尼明确表达了她的目标,即阐明人类、动物、植物和其他非人类实体之间多孔的界限,以解决诸如“我们对地球、其他人和其他生命形式的责任是什么?”没有我们的生活会是什么样子?1“梦想的牛奶”这个短语取自一本儿童绘本的书名,这本绘本是由利奥诺拉·卡灵顿在20世纪50年代创作和绘制的。卡灵顿的《梦的牛奶》是一本故事和寓言的合集,从黑色幽默到恐怖都有。大多数作品的特点是儿童和动物相互配合,身体处于各种拆卸和混合状态。头飞走了,只会被口香糖粘上;一个六条腿的吉娃娃女人戴着珍珠项链在街上游荡。体液和腐肉的凄惨图像展现了人类和非人类身体始终脆弱的躯壳。正如文化理论家唐娜·哈拉威(Donna haraway)——在阿勒马尼的双年展中深深感受到她的影响——简洁地写道:“人类不是在一个单独的堆肥堆里。2双年展上的一些艺术品直接与这些想法作了斗争:在视频《堆肥之歌:变异的身体,爆炸的星星》(2020)中,eglvilytytnik(1989年,立陶宛维尔纽斯),个人好像在出神地移动,身体有节奏地扭曲,在水中、地衣上和沙子上滑行、爬行和翻倒,演绎着神秘的非人类生物的舞蹈。身体之间的多孔边界比比皆是:例如,在克里斯蒂娜·夸尔斯(Christina Quarles, 1985年生于芝加哥)的油画和素描中,污迹和水滴将已经扭曲的身体彼此融合在一起,成为一团性别不确定的肢体。2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)全球大流行凸显了我们与非人类生物的相互联系,因为一种小到人眼无法看到的病毒不可逆转地改变了我们的生活。与此同时,当我们绝望地隔离以避免感染时,病毒引发了一种下意识的反应,使自主的神话加倍。因此,一个将人体置于物种间交流的非等级网络中的双年展,既复杂又至关重要。贾尔迪尼中央馆的两个最初的画廊说明了展览如何将人类经验分散开来,并重新配置已建立的艺术史。卡塔琳娜·弗里奇(Katharina Fritsch, 1956年生于德国埃森)的一尊大象纪念性雕塑是第一个展厅的唯一展品。超现实主义的《象/象》(1987)站在基座上,是这次展览的一个庄严的使者,如果不是怪异的话。虽然弗里奇的雕塑现在是历史性的——这是她在20世纪80年代首次尝试大型作品——但在这里,它采用了一种新的、特定地点的意义层。展览的目录条目解释说,一头名叫托尼的大象,绰号“贾迪尼的囚犯”,在19世纪90年代住在贾迪尼的公园里弗里奇以精确的细节描绘了这只动物,皮肤的绿色色调向无生命的世界暗示——一个氧化的青铜纪念碑,或者腐烂的肉体。这种超凡脱俗的色彩与其说是一种胜利的回归,不如说是囚禁的幽灵痕迹仍然是我们现在的一部分。在Fritsch的雕塑之后——考虑到大象社会组织的结构,也许是一位母象主持展览——下一个展厅结合了Andra Ursuţa(生于1979年,罗马尼亚萨隆塔)和Rosemarie Trockel(生于1952年,德国施沃特)的巨型针织单色雕塑。Ursuţa的杂合物——通常是由她自己的身体铸成,并与无机物体结合——从一系列材料中汲取灵感,包括铅水晶、玻璃瓶、回收垃圾、塑料管和BDSM服装。 《食肉动物的反斗城》(2020)采用了一个平躺着的裸体的形式,以一种从古代到19世纪西方艺术史上最重要的修辞之一的姿势懒洋洋地躺着。这个人没有脸,支离破碎,有一个旋转的蓝色和橙色表皮,腿末端是触手状的附体,灵感来自电影《铁血战士》(1987)中的外星人。植物碎片、汽水瓶和人形特征结合在一起,形成了半身像,所有这些都用诱人的彩色调色板渲染,让人联想到放射性污染物或科幻小说中的外星人。围绕着这些混合画的是特罗克的编织画,它建立在但也颠覆了现代主义单色绘画的悠久历史。在像卡齐米尔·马列维奇这样的人手中,单色绘画被简化为最纯粹的形式,一种对未知未来的乌托邦式的想象,其中所有的偶然
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Beyond-Human Biennale
Nearly every review of the Fifty-Ninth Venice Biennale cites its most impressive statistic: of the 217 artists participating in curator Cecilia Alemani’s international exhibition The Milk of Dreams, approximately 90 percent identify as women or gender nonconforming. This overwhelming majority enacts a radical reversal of the biennale’s statistical history, in which women’s contributions have typically hovered around 30 percent at best. Gender parity was only achieved in the most recent, 2019 biennale, with women-identifying individuals comprising 53 percent of artists in the central exhibition. The Milk of Dreams amounts to an intriguing course correction that signals not only new directions in contemporary art but reframes art history through alternative and gendered perspectives. I join the chorus of praise for Alemani’s exhibition, and I would add that there are other important representations afoot here. While some may (pejoratively) call this a “women’s biennale,” it is also (exuberantly) an exhibition of nonhuman actors: animals, plants, creatures, monsters, and cyborgs. In statements and interviews, Alemani has articulated her goal to illuminate the porous boundaries between human, animal, plant, and other nonhuman entities, in order to address such questions as “[W]hat are our responsibilities towards the planet, other people, and other life forms? And what would life look like without us?”1 The phrase “the milk of dreams” is taken from the title of an illustrated children’s book written and illustrated by Leonora Carrington in the 1950s. Carrington’s Milk of Dreams is a collection of tales and fables that range from darkly funny to horrifying. Most feature children and animals in concert with one another, bodies in various states of disassembly and hybridity. Heads fly off only to be reattached with chewing gum; a six-legged monstrous chihuahua woman wanders the streets bedecked in pearls. Abject images of bodily fluids and rotting meat foreground an insistently vulnerable corporeality of both human and nonhuman bodies. As cultural theorist Donna Haraway—whose influence is deeply felt in Alemani’s biennale—has succinctly written, “human beings are not in a separate compost pile.”2 Some artworks in the biennale grapple with these ideas head on: in the video Songs from the Compost: Mutating Bodies, Imploding Stars (2020) by Eglė Budvytytė (b. 1989, Vilnius, Lithuania), individuals move as though in a trance, bodies rhythmically contorting to slither, crawl, and flop in water, on lichen, and on sand, enacting the choreography of mysterious nonhuman organisms. Porous boundaries between bodies abound: in Christina Quarles’s (b. 1985, Chicago) paintings and drawings, for example, smears and drips merge already distorted bodies into one another, becoming a sexually indeterminate tangle of limbs. The global COVID-19 pandemic foregrounded our interconnectedness to nonhuman organisms, in that a virus too small for human eyes to see irrevocably changed our lives. Simultaneously, the virus galvanized a kneejerk reaction to double down on the myth of autonomy, as we desperately isolated to avoid infection. Consequently, a biennale that situates the human body in a nonhierarchical network of interspecies exchange feels at once complicated and crucial. Two initial galleries in the Central Pavilion of the Giardini illustrate the way in which the exhibition decenters the human experience and reconfigures established art histories. A monumental sculpture of an elephant by Katharina Fritsch (b. 1956, Essen, Germany) is the sole occupant of the first gallery. The hyperrealistic Elefant/Elephant (1987) stands on a pedestal, a dignified if not eerie emissary of the exhibition. While Fritsch’s sculpture is now historical—among her first forays into large-scale work in the 1980s—here it adopts a new, site-specific layer of meaning. The exhibition’s catalog entry explains that an elephant named Toni, nicknamed “the prisoner in the Giardini,” lived in the Giardini’s parkland grounds in the 1890s.3 While Fritsch renders the animal in precise detail, the skin’s green tint gestures toward the world of the inanimate— an oxidizing bronze monument, or rotting flesh. The otherworldly tint suggests not so much a triumphant return but simply that the ghostly traces of captivity remain part of our present. Following Fritsch’s sculpture—perhaps a matriarch presiding over the exhibition, given the structure of elephant social organization—the next gallery combines humancreature-machine figures by Andra Ursuţa (b. 1979, Salonta, Romania) with Rosemarie Trockel’s (b. 1952, Schwerte, Germany) giant knit monochromes. Ursuţa’s hybrids—often cast from her own body and combined with inorganic objects—draw from a range of materials, including lead crystal, glass bottles, reclaimed trash, plastic tubes, and BDSM garments. Predators ’R Us (2020) takes the form of a recumbent nude, lounging in a pose that was one of the foremost tropes in Western art history from antiquity to the nineteenth century. The figure is faceless and fragmented, with a swirling blue and orange epidermis, legs terminating in tentacled appendages inspired by the alien from the movie Predator (1987). Fragments of plants, soda bottles, and humanoid features combine to form portrait busts, all rendered in a seductively iridescent palette that conjures radioactive contaminants or sci-fi visions of extraterrestrials. Surrounding these hybrids are Trockel’s knit paintings, which build on but also subvert a venerable history of the modernist monochrome. In the hands of someone like Kazimir Malevich, the monochrome was painting reduced to its purest form, a utopian vision of an unknown future in which all contingen-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信