对梅尔索的审判

IF 0.2 0 LITERATURE, ROMANCE

Romanic Review Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1215/00358118-8503492

Hanan Elsayed

{"title":"对梅尔索的审判","authors":"Hanan Elsayed","doi":"10.1215/00358118-8503492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This essay focuses on Kamel Daoud’s “response” to Albert Camus’s L’Étranger by highlighting the differences in and implications of their writing styles and narrative voices. Daoud’s narrative refigures the concept of the absurd and his linkage of Camus’s silences to the colonial condition. However, the colonial legacy continues to pervade Daoud’s own narrative particularly in his portrayal of contemporary Algeria and Islam. There are unresolved contradictions in the fabric of Daoud’s text as well as a silence that emerges from a hyperbolic bavardage.","PeriodicalId":39614,"journal":{"name":"Romanic Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Trial of Meursault\",\"authors\":\"Hanan Elsayed\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/00358118-8503492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This essay focuses on Kamel Daoud’s “response” to Albert Camus’s L’Étranger by highlighting the differences in and implications of their writing styles and narrative voices. Daoud’s narrative refigures the concept of the absurd and his linkage of Camus’s silences to the colonial condition. However, the colonial legacy continues to pervade Daoud’s own narrative particularly in his portrayal of contemporary Algeria and Islam. There are unresolved contradictions in the fabric of Daoud’s text as well as a silence that emerges from a hyperbolic bavardage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanic Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/00358118-8503492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, ROMANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00358118-8503492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以卡迈勒·达乌德对加缪的《L’Étranger》的“回应”为重点，突出了他们在写作风格和叙事声音上的差异及其含义。达乌德的叙述重塑了荒谬的概念，并将加缪的沉默与殖民条件联系起来。然而，殖民遗产继续渗透在达乌德自己的叙述中，特别是在他对当代阿尔及利亚和伊斯兰教的描绘中。在达乌德的文本结构中存在未解决的矛盾，以及从夸张的破坏中出现的沉默。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Trial of Meursault

This essay focuses on Kamel Daoud’s “response” to Albert Camus’s L’Étranger by highlighting the differences in and implications of their writing styles and narrative voices. Daoud’s narrative refigures the concept of the absurd and his linkage of Camus’s silences to the colonial condition. However, the colonial legacy continues to pervade Daoud’s own narrative particularly in his portrayal of contemporary Algeria and Islam. There are unresolved contradictions in the fabric of Daoud’s text as well as a silence that emerges from a hyperbolic bavardage.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Romanic Review Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Romanic Review is a journal devoted to the study of Romance literatures.Founded by Henry Alfred Todd in 1910, it is published by the Department of French and Romance Philology of Columbia University in cooperation with the Departments of Spanish and Italian. The journal is published four times a year (January, March, May, November) and balances special thematic issues and regular unsolicited issues. It covers all periods of French, Italian and Spanish-language literature, and welcomes a broad diversity of critical approaches.