“测试”如何成为“程序化的学习评估”

Q1 Nursing
Lambert W.T. Schuwirth , Cees P.M. van der Vleuten
{"title":"“测试”如何成为“程序化的学习评估”","authors":"Lambert W.T. Schuwirth ,&nbsp;Cees P.M. van der Vleuten","doi":"10.1016/j.hpe.2018.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Programmatic assessment for learning is a fundamentally different approach to assessment than the more traditional methods. Yet, it is a logical next step given the history of assessment. In this narrative and subjective review we describe our view on the historical developments in assessment and how they have logically led to the development of programmatic assessment for learning.</p><p>The early stages of assessment focussed on measurement of competence with an aim to develop the single best method for each aspect of competence. With the development of competencies the notion of integration and more meaningful assessment emerged but still reductionist issues remained. Programmatic assessment for learning currently seeks to assess students more holistically and meaningfully with rigorous attention to trustworthiness and credibility of the whole assessment process. As such, it may be a revolutionary development but it strongly builds on previous research and insights in the field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93562,"journal":{"name":"Health professions education","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 177-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hpe.2018.06.005","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How ‘Testing’ Has Become ‘Programmatic Assessment for Learning’\",\"authors\":\"Lambert W.T. Schuwirth ,&nbsp;Cees P.M. van der Vleuten\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hpe.2018.06.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Programmatic assessment for learning is a fundamentally different approach to assessment than the more traditional methods. Yet, it is a logical next step given the history of assessment. In this narrative and subjective review we describe our view on the historical developments in assessment and how they have logically led to the development of programmatic assessment for learning.</p><p>The early stages of assessment focussed on measurement of competence with an aim to develop the single best method for each aspect of competence. With the development of competencies the notion of integration and more meaningful assessment emerged but still reductionist issues remained. Programmatic assessment for learning currently seeks to assess students more holistically and meaningfully with rigorous attention to trustworthiness and credibility of the whole assessment process. As such, it may be a revolutionary development but it strongly builds on previous research and insights in the field.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health professions education\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 177-184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hpe.2018.06.005\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health professions education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452301118301172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health professions education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452301118301172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

程序性学习评估是一种与传统方法根本不同的评估方法。然而,考虑到评估的历史,这是一个合乎逻辑的下一步。在这个叙述和主观回顾中,我们描述了我们对评估的历史发展的看法,以及它们如何在逻辑上导致了学习的程序化评估的发展。评估的早期阶段侧重于能力的测量,目的是为能力的每个方面制定单一的最佳方法。随着能力的发展,出现了整合和更有意义的评估的概念,但仍然存在简化问题。目前,程序性学习评估旨在更全面、更有意义地评估学生,并严格关注整个评估过程的可信度和可信度。因此,它可能是一个革命性的发展,但它在很大程度上建立在该领域以前的研究和见解之上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How ‘Testing’ Has Become ‘Programmatic Assessment for Learning’

Programmatic assessment for learning is a fundamentally different approach to assessment than the more traditional methods. Yet, it is a logical next step given the history of assessment. In this narrative and subjective review we describe our view on the historical developments in assessment and how they have logically led to the development of programmatic assessment for learning.

The early stages of assessment focussed on measurement of competence with an aim to develop the single best method for each aspect of competence. With the development of competencies the notion of integration and more meaningful assessment emerged but still reductionist issues remained. Programmatic assessment for learning currently seeks to assess students more holistically and meaningfully with rigorous attention to trustworthiness and credibility of the whole assessment process. As such, it may be a revolutionary development but it strongly builds on previous research and insights in the field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信