探索在新英格兰利用活海岸线稳定和减少养分

IF 2.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Mary Schoell, Suzanne Ayvazian, Donald Cobb, David Grunden, Marty Chintala, Anna Gerber-Williams, Adam Pimenta, Charles Strobel, Kenneth Rocha
{"title":"探索在新英格兰利用活海岸线稳定和减少养分","authors":"Mary Schoell, Suzanne Ayvazian, Donald Cobb, David Grunden, Marty Chintala, Anna Gerber-Williams, Adam Pimenta, Charles Strobel, Kenneth Rocha","doi":"10.3368/er.41.2-3.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As salt marsh habitats face challenges due to sea level rise, storm events, and coastal development, there is an effort to use nature-based approaches such as living shorelines to enhance salt marshes and provide coastal protection. A living shoreline restoration and seasonal monitoring was conducted between July 2016 and October 2018 at an eroding salt marsh on Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts, Northeastern USA to assess changes in two essential ecosystem services: shoreline stabilization and nitrogen removal. Neither the living shoreline nor unaltered sites demonstrated significant sediment deposition at the marsh edge or on the marsh platform between 2017 and 2018. While we expected nitrogen removal via denitrification to improve at the living shoreline sites over time as abiotic and biotic conditions became more favorable, we found limited support for this hypothesis. We found higher rates of denitrification enzyme activity (DEA) at the living shoreline sites when compared to unaltered sites, but these rates did not increase over time. This study also provides a qualitative assessment of our living shoreline structural integrity through the years, particularly following storm events that greatly challenged our restoration efforts. We demonstrate that living shorelines fortified solely with natural materials may not be the most effective approach to maintain these ecosystem services for Northeastern USA salt marshes exposed to intense northeasterly storms. We suggest the restoration of salt marshes to improve major functions be a priority among managers and restoration practitioners. Initiatives promoting the use of nature-based restoration solution where environmental conditions permit should be encouraged.</p>","PeriodicalId":11492,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Restoration","volume":"41 1","pages":"84-98"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Use of Living Shorelines for Stabilization and Nutrient Mitigation in New England.\",\"authors\":\"Mary Schoell, Suzanne Ayvazian, Donald Cobb, David Grunden, Marty Chintala, Anna Gerber-Williams, Adam Pimenta, Charles Strobel, Kenneth Rocha\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/er.41.2-3.84\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As salt marsh habitats face challenges due to sea level rise, storm events, and coastal development, there is an effort to use nature-based approaches such as living shorelines to enhance salt marshes and provide coastal protection. A living shoreline restoration and seasonal monitoring was conducted between July 2016 and October 2018 at an eroding salt marsh on Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts, Northeastern USA to assess changes in two essential ecosystem services: shoreline stabilization and nitrogen removal. Neither the living shoreline nor unaltered sites demonstrated significant sediment deposition at the marsh edge or on the marsh platform between 2017 and 2018. While we expected nitrogen removal via denitrification to improve at the living shoreline sites over time as abiotic and biotic conditions became more favorable, we found limited support for this hypothesis. We found higher rates of denitrification enzyme activity (DEA) at the living shoreline sites when compared to unaltered sites, but these rates did not increase over time. This study also provides a qualitative assessment of our living shoreline structural integrity through the years, particularly following storm events that greatly challenged our restoration efforts. We demonstrate that living shorelines fortified solely with natural materials may not be the most effective approach to maintain these ecosystem services for Northeastern USA salt marshes exposed to intense northeasterly storms. We suggest the restoration of salt marshes to improve major functions be a priority among managers and restoration practitioners. Initiatives promoting the use of nature-based restoration solution where environmental conditions permit should be encouraged.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Restoration\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"84-98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659082/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Restoration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/er.41.2-3.84\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/er.41.2-3.84","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于海平面上升、风暴事件和沿海发展,盐沼栖息地面临挑战,人们努力利用基于自然的方法(如生物海岸线)来增强盐沼并提供海岸保护。2016年7月至2018年10月,在美国东北部马萨诸塞州玛莎葡萄园岛的一个受侵蚀的盐沼上进行了活海岸线恢复和季节监测,以评估两种基本生态系统服务的变化:海岸线稳定和氮去除。在2017年至2018年期间,湿地边缘或沼泽平台上的生物海岸线和未改变的地点都没有显示出明显的沉积物沉积。虽然我们期望随着时间的推移,随着非生物和生物条件变得更加有利,通过反硝化去除氮的能力会提高,但我们发现这一假设的支持有限。我们发现,与未改变的地点相比,活的海岸线地点的反硝化酶活性(DEA)率更高,但这些率并没有随着时间的推移而增加。本研究还对多年来的海岸线结构完整性进行了定性评估,特别是在风暴事件给我们的修复工作带来巨大挑战之后。我们证明,仅用天然材料加固的活海岸线可能不是维持美国东北部遭受强烈东北风暴的盐沼生态系统服务的最有效方法。我们建议盐沼恢复是管理者和恢复从业者优先考虑的问题,以改善主要功能。应鼓励在环境条件允许的情况下提倡使用基于自然的恢复技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Use of Living Shorelines for Stabilization and Nutrient Mitigation in New England.

As salt marsh habitats face challenges due to sea level rise, storm events, and coastal development, there is an effort to use nature-based approaches such as living shorelines to enhance salt marshes and provide coastal protection. A living shoreline restoration and seasonal monitoring was conducted between July 2016 and October 2018 at an eroding salt marsh on Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts, Northeastern USA to assess changes in two essential ecosystem services: shoreline stabilization and nitrogen removal. Neither the living shoreline nor unaltered sites demonstrated significant sediment deposition at the marsh edge or on the marsh platform between 2017 and 2018. While we expected nitrogen removal via denitrification to improve at the living shoreline sites over time as abiotic and biotic conditions became more favorable, we found limited support for this hypothesis. We found higher rates of denitrification enzyme activity (DEA) at the living shoreline sites when compared to unaltered sites, but these rates did not increase over time. This study also provides a qualitative assessment of our living shoreline structural integrity through the years, particularly following storm events that greatly challenged our restoration efforts. We demonstrate that living shorelines fortified solely with natural materials may not be the most effective approach to maintain these ecosystem services for Northeastern USA salt marshes exposed to intense northeasterly storms. We suggest the restoration of salt marshes to improve major functions be a priority among managers and restoration practitioners. Initiatives promoting the use of nature-based restoration solution where environmental conditions permit should be encouraged.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Restoration
Ecological Restoration Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Ecological Restoration is a forum for people advancing the science and practice of restoration ecology. It features the technical and biological aspects of restoring landscapes, as well as collaborations between restorationists and the design professions, land-use policy, the role of education, and more. This quarterly publication includes peer-reviewed science articles, perspectives and notes, book reviews, abstracts of restoration ecology progress published elsewhere, and announcements of scientific and professional meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信