1991年后埃塞俄比亚的联邦制与土地权

IF 1.1 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Brightman Gebremichael Ganta
{"title":"1991年后埃塞俄比亚的联邦制与土地权","authors":"Brightman Gebremichael Ganta","doi":"10.1177/0169796X221130533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The land rights question has always been at the center of the political–economic history of Ethiopia as a modern state. It serves as a means of political control and/or a cause for/of political struggle. The adoption of “ethnic-based” federalism in post-1991 Ethiopia further introduces the federal state power competition over land matters and contributes a distinct and divergent way of perceiving the relationship between the state and people’s ownership of land as adopted in the 1995 federal Constitution. The Constitution establishes the Central government as a unifying force to create a single politico-economic community and federating states on an ethnic basis to ensure self-rule and accommodate diversities. Accordingly, the Constitution provides the Central government with the power to determine land utilization and protection while empowering the states to administer the same. However, the reality is that this constitutional foundation is ignored at every level of government. A general misunderstanding of the nature of land ownership and the division of power between the various levels of government contribute to bypassing the Constitution requirements. This has, in effect, contributed to the eviction of individuals and communities from another sister state by claiming that “land belongs to the state and people of the regional state,” thus resulting in the tension and conflict between federal and state governments.","PeriodicalId":45003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developing Societies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Federalism and Land Rights in the Context of Post-1991 Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Brightman Gebremichael Ganta\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0169796X221130533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The land rights question has always been at the center of the political–economic history of Ethiopia as a modern state. It serves as a means of political control and/or a cause for/of political struggle. The adoption of “ethnic-based” federalism in post-1991 Ethiopia further introduces the federal state power competition over land matters and contributes a distinct and divergent way of perceiving the relationship between the state and people’s ownership of land as adopted in the 1995 federal Constitution. The Constitution establishes the Central government as a unifying force to create a single politico-economic community and federating states on an ethnic basis to ensure self-rule and accommodate diversities. Accordingly, the Constitution provides the Central government with the power to determine land utilization and protection while empowering the states to administer the same. However, the reality is that this constitutional foundation is ignored at every level of government. A general misunderstanding of the nature of land ownership and the division of power between the various levels of government contribute to bypassing the Constitution requirements. This has, in effect, contributed to the eviction of individuals and communities from another sister state by claiming that “land belongs to the state and people of the regional state,” thus resulting in the tension and conflict between federal and state governments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Developing Societies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Developing Societies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X221130533\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developing Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X221130533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为一个现代国家,土地权利问题一直是埃塞俄比亚政治经济史的中心问题。它是政治控制的手段和/或政治斗争的原因。1991年后埃塞俄比亚采用“以种族为基础”的联邦制,进一步引入了联邦国家权力在土地问题上的竞争,并有助于以一种独特而不同的方式来看待1995年联邦宪法所采用的国家与人民土地所有权之间的关系。《宪法》将中央政府确立为一个统一的力量,以建立一个单一的政治经济共同体和以民族为基础的联邦制国家,以确保自治和容纳多样性。因此,《宪法》赋予中央政府决定土地利用和保护的权力,同时赋予各州管理土地的权力。然而,现实情况是,这一宪法基础在各级政府中被忽视。对土地所有权的性质和各级政府之间的权力划分的普遍误解有助于绕过宪法的要求。这实际上助长了以“土地属于州和地区州的人民”为由将个人和社区从另一个姐妹州驱逐出去,从而导致联邦政府和州政府之间的紧张和冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Federalism and Land Rights in the Context of Post-1991 Ethiopia
The land rights question has always been at the center of the political–economic history of Ethiopia as a modern state. It serves as a means of political control and/or a cause for/of political struggle. The adoption of “ethnic-based” federalism in post-1991 Ethiopia further introduces the federal state power competition over land matters and contributes a distinct and divergent way of perceiving the relationship between the state and people’s ownership of land as adopted in the 1995 federal Constitution. The Constitution establishes the Central government as a unifying force to create a single politico-economic community and federating states on an ethnic basis to ensure self-rule and accommodate diversities. Accordingly, the Constitution provides the Central government with the power to determine land utilization and protection while empowering the states to administer the same. However, the reality is that this constitutional foundation is ignored at every level of government. A general misunderstanding of the nature of land ownership and the division of power between the various levels of government contribute to bypassing the Constitution requirements. This has, in effect, contributed to the eviction of individuals and communities from another sister state by claiming that “land belongs to the state and people of the regional state,” thus resulting in the tension and conflict between federal and state governments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Developing Societies
Journal of Developing Societies DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The Journal of Developing Societies is a refereed international journal on development and social change in all societies. JDS provides an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of theoretical perspectives, research findings, case studies, policy analyses and normative critiques on the issues, problems and policies associated with both mainstream and alternative approaches to development. The scope of the journal is not limited to articles on the Third World or the Global South, rather it encompasses articles on development and change in the "developed" as well as "developing" societies of the world. The journal seeks to represent the full range of diverse theoretical and ideological viewpoints on development that exist in the contemporary international community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信