探讨高等教育中学生对口头陈述评估的看法

Q4 Social Sciences
Dan Lin
{"title":"探讨高等教育中学生对口头陈述评估的看法","authors":"Dan Lin","doi":"10.7459/ept/45.1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oral presentation assessments are commonly used in higher education. This paper conducts an exploratory study and investigates student perceptions of oral presentation assessments on two aspects, the benefits of oral presentations for presenting students and the engagement of non-presenting\n students during presentations. A mixed method with both qualitative and quantitative survey questions is used for collecting data from students undertaking an elective Finance course in the third year of an undergraduate degree. Results show that presenting students perceive the oral presentation\n assessment as beneficial to their learning and developing presentation skills. Peer evaluations and reciprocal peer questioning, intended to increase non-presenting students’ engagement during presentations, are also well-received by students. The frequency count of students’ feedback\n indicates that reciprocal peer questioning facilitates engagement better than peer evaluations.","PeriodicalId":35223,"journal":{"name":"Educational Practice & Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Student Perceptions of Oral Presentation Assessments in Higher Education\",\"authors\":\"Dan Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.7459/ept/45.1.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Oral presentation assessments are commonly used in higher education. This paper conducts an exploratory study and investigates student perceptions of oral presentation assessments on two aspects, the benefits of oral presentations for presenting students and the engagement of non-presenting\\n students during presentations. A mixed method with both qualitative and quantitative survey questions is used for collecting data from students undertaking an elective Finance course in the third year of an undergraduate degree. Results show that presenting students perceive the oral presentation\\n assessment as beneficial to their learning and developing presentation skills. Peer evaluations and reciprocal peer questioning, intended to increase non-presenting students’ engagement during presentations, are also well-received by students. The frequency count of students’ feedback\\n indicates that reciprocal peer questioning facilitates engagement better than peer evaluations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Practice & Theory\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Practice & Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7459/ept/45.1.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Practice & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7459/ept/45.1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

口头陈述评估通常用于高等教育。本文进行了一项探索性研究,并从两个方面调查了学生对口头报告评估的看法,即口头报告对做报告的学生的好处和不做报告的学生在报告中的参与度。本文采用定性和定量调查问题相结合的混合方法,对本科三年级选修金融课程的学生进行数据收集。结果显示,做报告的学生认为口头报告评估对他们的学习和发展报告技巧有益。同伴评价和互惠的同伴提问,旨在提高不发言的学生在演讲中的参与度,也受到了学生们的欢迎。学生反馈的频率计数表明,相互的同伴提问比同伴评价更有利于参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Student Perceptions of Oral Presentation Assessments in Higher Education
Oral presentation assessments are commonly used in higher education. This paper conducts an exploratory study and investigates student perceptions of oral presentation assessments on two aspects, the benefits of oral presentations for presenting students and the engagement of non-presenting students during presentations. A mixed method with both qualitative and quantitative survey questions is used for collecting data from students undertaking an elective Finance course in the third year of an undergraduate degree. Results show that presenting students perceive the oral presentation assessment as beneficial to their learning and developing presentation skills. Peer evaluations and reciprocal peer questioning, intended to increase non-presenting students’ engagement during presentations, are also well-received by students. The frequency count of students’ feedback indicates that reciprocal peer questioning facilitates engagement better than peer evaluations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Practice & Theory
Educational Practice & Theory Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Educational Practice and Theory in its 40th year of publication continues as an important independent forum for original ideas in education research relevant to aspects of education including K-12 schools, education reforms, teaching methods and educational leadership. Educational Practice and Theory is: -a refereed journal with a distinguished panel of consulting editors; -comparative in focus; -innovative, path-finding and provocative; -diverse with reports on a wide range of countries and themes, and -applied and theoretical.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信