什么是仪式?埃米尔·涂尔干,一百年后

Q2 Social Sciences
Lorenzo d’Orsi, F. Dei
{"title":"什么是仪式?埃米尔·涂尔干,一百年后","authors":"Lorenzo d’Orsi, F. Dei","doi":"10.1515/opis-2018-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper is focused on the anthropological concept of ritual, starting from Emile Durkheim's approach in Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse (1912). We discuss three different aspects of the Durkheimian perspective on religion and rituals: a) the sacred/profane dichotomy; b) the concept of collective representations - which establishes a substantial continuity between religious and scientific thought; c) a ‟practical” and performative interpretation of rites as the basis of social bond. During the twentieth century, these aspects have influenced different and sometimes opposing theoretical approaches (including ‟symbolist” and ‟neo-intellectualist” theories and Victor Turner's ‟anthropology of experience”). We briefly review each of them, arguing for the importance of reconsidering them into a unitary perspective, centred on religious phenomena as basically moral experiences and as the language of social relations. In the conclusions, we will show how such unitary approach helps us understand the transformations as well as the continuities of rituality in the individualized and secularized societies of what we call nowadays the Western world.","PeriodicalId":32626,"journal":{"name":"Open Information Science","volume":"2 1","pages":"115 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/opis-2018-0009","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is a rite? Émile Durkheim, a hundred years later\",\"authors\":\"Lorenzo d’Orsi, F. Dei\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/opis-2018-0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper is focused on the anthropological concept of ritual, starting from Emile Durkheim's approach in Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse (1912). We discuss three different aspects of the Durkheimian perspective on religion and rituals: a) the sacred/profane dichotomy; b) the concept of collective representations - which establishes a substantial continuity between religious and scientific thought; c) a ‟practical” and performative interpretation of rites as the basis of social bond. During the twentieth century, these aspects have influenced different and sometimes opposing theoretical approaches (including ‟symbolist” and ‟neo-intellectualist” theories and Victor Turner's ‟anthropology of experience”). We briefly review each of them, arguing for the importance of reconsidering them into a unitary perspective, centred on religious phenomena as basically moral experiences and as the language of social relations. In the conclusions, we will show how such unitary approach helps us understand the transformations as well as the continuities of rituality in the individualized and secularized societies of what we call nowadays the Western world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Information Science\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"115 - 126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/opis-2018-0009\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Information Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2018-0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2018-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要本文从埃米尔·涂尔干(Emile Durkheim)在《宗教生活的形式》(Les formesélémentaires de la vie religieuse,1912)一书中提出的仪式观入手,对人类学仪式观进行了研究。我们讨论了涂尔干关于宗教和仪式的观点的三个不同方面:a)神圣/世俗的二分法;b) 集体表征的概念——它在宗教思想和科学思想之间建立了实质性的连续性;c) 对作为社会纽带基础的仪式的“实践”和表演性解释。在二十世纪,这些方面影响了不同的、有时是对立的理论方法(包括“象征主义”和“新智主义”理论以及维克托·特纳的“经验人类学”)。我们简要回顾了它们中的每一个,认为将它们重新考虑到一个统一的视角中的重要性,以宗教现象为中心,将其作为基本的道德体验和社会关系的语言。在结论中,我们将展示这种统一的方法如何帮助我们理解我们今天所说的西方世界的个性化和世俗化社会中仪式性的转变和持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What is a rite? Émile Durkheim, a hundred years later
Abstract This paper is focused on the anthropological concept of ritual, starting from Emile Durkheim's approach in Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse (1912). We discuss three different aspects of the Durkheimian perspective on religion and rituals: a) the sacred/profane dichotomy; b) the concept of collective representations - which establishes a substantial continuity between religious and scientific thought; c) a ‟practical” and performative interpretation of rites as the basis of social bond. During the twentieth century, these aspects have influenced different and sometimes opposing theoretical approaches (including ‟symbolist” and ‟neo-intellectualist” theories and Victor Turner's ‟anthropology of experience”). We briefly review each of them, arguing for the importance of reconsidering them into a unitary perspective, centred on religious phenomena as basically moral experiences and as the language of social relations. In the conclusions, we will show how such unitary approach helps us understand the transformations as well as the continuities of rituality in the individualized and secularized societies of what we call nowadays the Western world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Information Science
Open Information Science Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信