新闻集团新闻与评论分离的政策与新闻委员会的核心原则相矛盾

IF 0.9 Q3 COMMUNICATION
D. Muller
{"title":"新闻集团新闻与评论分离的政策与新闻委员会的核心原则相矛盾","authors":"D. Muller","doi":"10.1386/ajr_00114_7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a conflict between the general principle of the Australian Press Council concerning the separation of news from comment and the editorial policy of News Corporation (News Corp) which allows its journalists to mix the two so that readers might see what the newspaper’s view is on the matter being reported. This article argues that this policy is a crucial part of the machinery that enables the Murdoch press to prosecute feuds, intimidate politicians and engage in hyper-partisan campaigning without regard for truth or consequences. It further argues that the Press Council is compromised in dealing with it by its reliance on News Corp as the single biggest provider of its funding. The argument is reinforced by the Council’s incapacity to answer straightforward questions about how it accommodates the conflict between its principle and News Corp’s policy.","PeriodicalId":36614,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journalism Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"News Corp’s policy on the separation of news and comment contradicts a core Press Council principle\",\"authors\":\"D. Muller\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/ajr_00114_7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a conflict between the general principle of the Australian Press Council concerning the separation of news from comment and the editorial policy of News Corporation (News Corp) which allows its journalists to mix the two so that readers might see what the newspaper’s view is on the matter being reported. This article argues that this policy is a crucial part of the machinery that enables the Murdoch press to prosecute feuds, intimidate politicians and engage in hyper-partisan campaigning without regard for truth or consequences. It further argues that the Press Council is compromised in dealing with it by its reliance on News Corp as the single biggest provider of its funding. The argument is reinforced by the Council’s incapacity to answer straightforward questions about how it accommodates the conflict between its principle and News Corp’s policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journalism Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journalism Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00114_7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journalism Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00114_7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

澳大利亚报业委员会关于新闻与评论分离的一般原则与新闻集团的编辑政策之间存在冲突,新闻集团允许其记者将两者混合在一起,以便读者可以看到报纸对所报道的事情的看法。本文认为,这一政策是默多克新闻机构的一个重要组成部分,它使默多克的媒体能够起诉不和,恐吓政客,并在不考虑真相或后果的情况下进行超党派竞选。它进一步辩称,由于新闻委员会依赖新闻集团作为其最大的单一资金提供者,它在与新闻委员会打交道时做出了妥协。该委员会无法回答一些直截了当的问题,即它如何处理其原则与新闻集团政策之间的冲突,这进一步强化了上述观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
News Corp’s policy on the separation of news and comment contradicts a core Press Council principle
There is a conflict between the general principle of the Australian Press Council concerning the separation of news from comment and the editorial policy of News Corporation (News Corp) which allows its journalists to mix the two so that readers might see what the newspaper’s view is on the matter being reported. This article argues that this policy is a crucial part of the machinery that enables the Murdoch press to prosecute feuds, intimidate politicians and engage in hyper-partisan campaigning without regard for truth or consequences. It further argues that the Press Council is compromised in dealing with it by its reliance on News Corp as the single biggest provider of its funding. The argument is reinforced by the Council’s incapacity to answer straightforward questions about how it accommodates the conflict between its principle and News Corp’s policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journalism Review
Australian Journalism Review Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信