回顾、重访和更新组织设计的基础

4区 管理学 Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
J. Joseph, O. Baumann, R. Burton, K. Srikanth
{"title":"回顾、重访和更新组织设计的基础","authors":"J. Joseph, O. Baumann, R. Burton, K. Srikanth","doi":"10.1108/S0742-332220180000040012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A long tradition of research has examined the determinants and consequences of organization design. Scholars in this field have mainly been concerned with the extent of empirical variation in organizational structures and the factors driving such variation (Chandler, 1962; Child, 1972; Donaldson, 2001). This stream of research has also charted the role that organization design plays in orchestrating a firm’s overall decision making and in the organizational behavior that follows (Burton & Obel, 1984; Galbraith, 1977; Mintzberg, 1979; Puranam, 2018; Simon, 1947). This extensive body of work draws its explanatory power from a variety of theories: behavioral theory of the firm, structural contingency theory, resource dependence, information processing, social networks, the knowledge-based view, and team theory. At the same time, organization design research is united as regards two key observations namely, that the central problems of design are: (1) how best to divide the organization into subunits and (2) how best to integrate or coordinate those subunits in support of the firm’s overall goals (Lawrence & Lorsch, 1967). This work accordingly acknowledges that there is no single template for “good organization,” much of which depends on the external environment and the firm’s own interdependencies (Thompson, 1967). Although the essence of design’s fundamental problems is still a touchstone in contemporary research, much is changing. Research on organization design has grown in the last decade as academics and managers have become increasingly preoccupied with the relevance of design for organizational strategy,","PeriodicalId":46550,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Strategic Management-A Research Annual","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/S0742-332220180000040012","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reviewing, Revisiting, and Renewing the Foundations of Organization Design\",\"authors\":\"J. Joseph, O. Baumann, R. Burton, K. Srikanth\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/S0742-332220180000040012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A long tradition of research has examined the determinants and consequences of organization design. Scholars in this field have mainly been concerned with the extent of empirical variation in organizational structures and the factors driving such variation (Chandler, 1962; Child, 1972; Donaldson, 2001). This stream of research has also charted the role that organization design plays in orchestrating a firm’s overall decision making and in the organizational behavior that follows (Burton & Obel, 1984; Galbraith, 1977; Mintzberg, 1979; Puranam, 2018; Simon, 1947). This extensive body of work draws its explanatory power from a variety of theories: behavioral theory of the firm, structural contingency theory, resource dependence, information processing, social networks, the knowledge-based view, and team theory. At the same time, organization design research is united as regards two key observations namely, that the central problems of design are: (1) how best to divide the organization into subunits and (2) how best to integrate or coordinate those subunits in support of the firm’s overall goals (Lawrence & Lorsch, 1967). This work accordingly acknowledges that there is no single template for “good organization,” much of which depends on the external environment and the firm’s own interdependencies (Thompson, 1967). Although the essence of design’s fundamental problems is still a touchstone in contemporary research, much is changing. Research on organization design has grown in the last decade as academics and managers have become increasingly preoccupied with the relevance of design for organizational strategy,\",\"PeriodicalId\":46550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Strategic Management-A Research Annual\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/S0742-332220180000040012\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Strategic Management-A Research Annual\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220180000040012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Strategic Management-A Research Annual","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220180000040012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

长期以来的研究传统一直在研究组织设计的决定因素和后果。该领域的学者主要关注组织结构的实证变化程度以及驱动这种变化的因素(Chandler,1962;Child,1972;Donaldson,2001)。这一系列研究还描绘了组织设计在组织企业整体决策和随后的组织行为中所起的作用(Burton&Obel,1984;加尔布雷思,1977年;明茨伯格,1979年;普兰南,2018年;西蒙,1947年)。这一广泛的工作来源于各种理论:企业行为理论、结构偶然性理论、资源依赖性、信息处理、社交网络、知识观和团队理论。同时,组织设计研究在两个关键观察点上是一致的,即设计的核心问题是:(1)如何最好地将组织划分为子单元;(2)如何最好的整合或协调这些子单元,以支持公司的总体目标(Lawrence&Lorsch,1967)。因此,这项工作承认,“良好组织”没有单一的模板,这在很大程度上取决于外部环境和公司自身的相互依赖性(Thompson,1967)。尽管设计基本问题的本质仍然是当代研究的试金石,但许多问题正在发生变化。在过去的十年里,随着学者和管理者越来越关注设计对组织战略的相关性,对组织设计的研究也在增长,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reviewing, Revisiting, and Renewing the Foundations of Organization Design
A long tradition of research has examined the determinants and consequences of organization design. Scholars in this field have mainly been concerned with the extent of empirical variation in organizational structures and the factors driving such variation (Chandler, 1962; Child, 1972; Donaldson, 2001). This stream of research has also charted the role that organization design plays in orchestrating a firm’s overall decision making and in the organizational behavior that follows (Burton & Obel, 1984; Galbraith, 1977; Mintzberg, 1979; Puranam, 2018; Simon, 1947). This extensive body of work draws its explanatory power from a variety of theories: behavioral theory of the firm, structural contingency theory, resource dependence, information processing, social networks, the knowledge-based view, and team theory. At the same time, organization design research is united as regards two key observations namely, that the central problems of design are: (1) how best to divide the organization into subunits and (2) how best to integrate or coordinate those subunits in support of the firm’s overall goals (Lawrence & Lorsch, 1967). This work accordingly acknowledges that there is no single template for “good organization,” much of which depends on the external environment and the firm’s own interdependencies (Thompson, 1967). Although the essence of design’s fundamental problems is still a touchstone in contemporary research, much is changing. Research on organization design has grown in the last decade as academics and managers have become increasingly preoccupied with the relevance of design for organizational strategy,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Advances in Strategic Management is dedicated to communicating innovative, new research that advances theory and practice in Strategic Management. The domain of the series encompasses, but is not limited to, corporate and business unit strategy, strategic organization and process, alliances and networks, and competitive dynamics. The series is committed to expanding the scope of Strategic Management theory and analysis and enriching practice by: -Encouraging multitheoretical approaches that span multiple social science disciplines -Welcoming papers using a diversity of innovative research methods -Creating focused volumes that explore in depth promising new research directions, consolidate research streams, and address significant current theoretical and practical problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信