{"title":"一个盖盒实验揭示了荷兰人的集体偏好","authors":"Anna Koster, J. Spenader, P. Hendriks","doi":"10.1075/avt.00037.kos","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Sentences with plural expressions are compatible with distributive and collective interpretations. Adults\n generally prefer collective interpretations, whereas children do not. Dotlačil (2010)\n argues that the adult collective preference arises via an implicature. Adults can reason about alternative utterances with the\n distributive marker each, thereby ruling out distributive interpretations in favor of collective interpretations.\n Experiment 1 used the covered-box paradigm to investigate whether adults and children make the comparisons predicted by Dotlačil’s\n implicature account. Adults’ responses suggest that they made comparisons with internally generated alternatives, supporting the\n implicature account. Moreover, children seem to do so from around 11 years old onwards, after they have learned the distributive\n character of each. Experiment 2 excluded the possibility that our results in Experiment 1 were influenced by\n participants’ exposure to both collective and distributive pictures, making the collective interpretation more salient. Both\n experiments thus point towards an implicature underlying the adult collective preference.","PeriodicalId":35138,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics in the Netherlands","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collective preferences in Dutch revealed by a covered-box experiment\",\"authors\":\"Anna Koster, J. Spenader, P. Hendriks\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/avt.00037.kos\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Sentences with plural expressions are compatible with distributive and collective interpretations. Adults\\n generally prefer collective interpretations, whereas children do not. Dotlačil (2010)\\n argues that the adult collective preference arises via an implicature. Adults can reason about alternative utterances with the\\n distributive marker each, thereby ruling out distributive interpretations in favor of collective interpretations.\\n Experiment 1 used the covered-box paradigm to investigate whether adults and children make the comparisons predicted by Dotlačil’s\\n implicature account. Adults’ responses suggest that they made comparisons with internally generated alternatives, supporting the\\n implicature account. Moreover, children seem to do so from around 11 years old onwards, after they have learned the distributive\\n character of each. Experiment 2 excluded the possibility that our results in Experiment 1 were influenced by\\n participants’ exposure to both collective and distributive pictures, making the collective interpretation more salient. Both\\n experiments thus point towards an implicature underlying the adult collective preference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistics in the Netherlands\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistics in the Netherlands\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00037.kos\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics in the Netherlands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00037.kos","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Collective preferences in Dutch revealed by a covered-box experiment
Sentences with plural expressions are compatible with distributive and collective interpretations. Adults
generally prefer collective interpretations, whereas children do not. Dotlačil (2010)
argues that the adult collective preference arises via an implicature. Adults can reason about alternative utterances with the
distributive marker each, thereby ruling out distributive interpretations in favor of collective interpretations.
Experiment 1 used the covered-box paradigm to investigate whether adults and children make the comparisons predicted by Dotlačil’s
implicature account. Adults’ responses suggest that they made comparisons with internally generated alternatives, supporting the
implicature account. Moreover, children seem to do so from around 11 years old onwards, after they have learned the distributive
character of each. Experiment 2 excluded the possibility that our results in Experiment 1 were influenced by
participants’ exposure to both collective and distributive pictures, making the collective interpretation more salient. Both
experiments thus point towards an implicature underlying the adult collective preference.
期刊介绍:
Linguistics in the Netherlands is a series of annual publications, sponsored by the Dutch Linguistics Association (Algemene Vereniging voor Taalwetenschap) and published by John Benjamins Publishing Company since Volume 8 in 1991. Each volume contains a careful selection through peer review of papers presented at the annual meeting of the society. The aim of the annual meeting is to provide members with an opportunity to report on their work in progress. Each volume presents an overview of research in different fields of linguistics in the Netherlands containing articles on phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax and semantics.