一个盖盒实验揭示了荷兰人的集体偏好

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Anna Koster, J. Spenader, P. Hendriks
{"title":"一个盖盒实验揭示了荷兰人的集体偏好","authors":"Anna Koster, J. Spenader, P. Hendriks","doi":"10.1075/avt.00037.kos","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Sentences with plural expressions are compatible with distributive and collective interpretations. Adults\n generally prefer collective interpretations, whereas children do not. Dotlačil (2010)\n argues that the adult collective preference arises via an implicature. Adults can reason about alternative utterances with the\n distributive marker each, thereby ruling out distributive interpretations in favor of collective interpretations.\n Experiment 1 used the covered-box paradigm to investigate whether adults and children make the comparisons predicted by Dotlačil’s\n implicature account. Adults’ responses suggest that they made comparisons with internally generated alternatives, supporting the\n implicature account. Moreover, children seem to do so from around 11 years old onwards, after they have learned the distributive\n character of each. Experiment 2 excluded the possibility that our results in Experiment 1 were influenced by\n participants’ exposure to both collective and distributive pictures, making the collective interpretation more salient. Both\n experiments thus point towards an implicature underlying the adult collective preference.","PeriodicalId":35138,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics in the Netherlands","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collective preferences in Dutch revealed by a covered-box experiment\",\"authors\":\"Anna Koster, J. Spenader, P. Hendriks\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/avt.00037.kos\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Sentences with plural expressions are compatible with distributive and collective interpretations. Adults\\n generally prefer collective interpretations, whereas children do not. Dotlačil (2010)\\n argues that the adult collective preference arises via an implicature. Adults can reason about alternative utterances with the\\n distributive marker each, thereby ruling out distributive interpretations in favor of collective interpretations.\\n Experiment 1 used the covered-box paradigm to investigate whether adults and children make the comparisons predicted by Dotlačil’s\\n implicature account. Adults’ responses suggest that they made comparisons with internally generated alternatives, supporting the\\n implicature account. Moreover, children seem to do so from around 11 years old onwards, after they have learned the distributive\\n character of each. Experiment 2 excluded the possibility that our results in Experiment 1 were influenced by\\n participants’ exposure to both collective and distributive pictures, making the collective interpretation more salient. Both\\n experiments thus point towards an implicature underlying the adult collective preference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistics in the Netherlands\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistics in the Netherlands\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00037.kos\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics in the Netherlands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00037.kos","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

使用复数表达的句子,既可以进行分配解释,也可以进行集体解释。成年人通常喜欢集体解读,而儿童则不喜欢。dotla(2010)认为,成人的集体偏好是通过暗示产生的。成年人可以与每个分配标记推理替代话语,从而排除分配解释,支持集体解释。实验1使用盖盒范式来研究成人和儿童是否会进行dotla含意解释所预测的比较。成年人的反应表明,他们与内部产生的替代方案进行了比较,支持了含义说。此外,孩子们似乎从11岁左右就开始这样做了,那时他们已经学会了每个人的分配特征。实验2排除了我们在实验1中的结果受到参与者对集体和分配图片的暴露的影响的可能性,使得集体解释更加突出。因此,这两个实验都指出了成人集体偏好背后的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collective preferences in Dutch revealed by a covered-box experiment
Sentences with plural expressions are compatible with distributive and collective interpretations. Adults generally prefer collective interpretations, whereas children do not. Dotlačil (2010) argues that the adult collective preference arises via an implicature. Adults can reason about alternative utterances with the distributive marker each, thereby ruling out distributive interpretations in favor of collective interpretations. Experiment 1 used the covered-box paradigm to investigate whether adults and children make the comparisons predicted by Dotlačil’s implicature account. Adults’ responses suggest that they made comparisons with internally generated alternatives, supporting the implicature account. Moreover, children seem to do so from around 11 years old onwards, after they have learned the distributive character of each. Experiment 2 excluded the possibility that our results in Experiment 1 were influenced by participants’ exposure to both collective and distributive pictures, making the collective interpretation more salient. Both experiments thus point towards an implicature underlying the adult collective preference.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistics in the Netherlands
Linguistics in the Netherlands Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Linguistics in the Netherlands is a series of annual publications, sponsored by the Dutch Linguistics Association (Algemene Vereniging voor Taalwetenschap) and published by John Benjamins Publishing Company since Volume 8 in 1991. Each volume contains a careful selection through peer review of papers presented at the annual meeting of the society. The aim of the annual meeting is to provide members with an opportunity to report on their work in progress. Each volume presents an overview of research in different fields of linguistics in the Netherlands containing articles on phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax and semantics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信