政治边缘化中的民族整合:埃塞俄比亚国家建设的矛盾

Q3 Arts and Humanities
E. Gebissa
{"title":"政治边缘化中的民族整合:埃塞俄比亚国家建设的矛盾","authors":"E. Gebissa","doi":"10.14321/nortafristud.21.2.151v","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:In Ethiopia, the nationalities question has been the most contentious political force shaping politics, engendering conflicts and obstructing national integration. In this article, I provide a historical analysis of the emergence in the 1960s of two dominant positions, \"ethionationalism\" and ethnonationalism, which coalesced into competing political visions of the character of the Ethiopian state. I posit that advocates of the two positions wrested power and tried to shape the state, writing constitutions and introducing political systems for governing Ethiopia. I discuss the transformation of these political positions and realignments as those in power maneuvered to deny Oromo nationalists access to political power, rejecting the idea of self-determination as a solution to the nationalities question. I conclude that the competing nationalisms have failed, and that the only way to create a stable Ethiopian state remains the position that Oromo nationalism has enunciated for half a century.","PeriodicalId":35635,"journal":{"name":"Northeast African Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National Integration through Political Marginalization: Contradictions of Nation-Building in Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"E. Gebissa\",\"doi\":\"10.14321/nortafristud.21.2.151v\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:In Ethiopia, the nationalities question has been the most contentious political force shaping politics, engendering conflicts and obstructing national integration. In this article, I provide a historical analysis of the emergence in the 1960s of two dominant positions, \\\"ethionationalism\\\" and ethnonationalism, which coalesced into competing political visions of the character of the Ethiopian state. I posit that advocates of the two positions wrested power and tried to shape the state, writing constitutions and introducing political systems for governing Ethiopia. I discuss the transformation of these political positions and realignments as those in power maneuvered to deny Oromo nationalists access to political power, rejecting the idea of self-determination as a solution to the nationalities question. I conclude that the competing nationalisms have failed, and that the only way to create a stable Ethiopian state remains the position that Oromo nationalism has enunciated for half a century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Northeast African Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Northeast African Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14321/nortafristud.21.2.151v\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northeast African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/nortafristud.21.2.151v","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在埃塞俄比亚,民族问题一直是影响政治、引发冲突、阻碍民族融合的最具争议的政治力量。在这篇文章中,我对20世纪60年代“埃塞俄比亚主义”和民族主义这两种主导地位的出现进行了历史分析,这两种地位融合成了埃塞俄比亚国家特征的相互竞争的政治愿景。我认为,这两种立场的倡导者夺取了权力,并试图塑造国家,起草宪法,引入政治制度来治理埃塞俄比亚。我讨论了这些政治立场的转变和重新调整,因为当权者试图拒绝奥罗莫民族主义者获得政治权力,拒绝将自决作为民族问题的解决方案。我的结论是,相互竞争的民族主义已经失败,建立一个稳定的埃塞俄比亚国家的唯一途径仍然是奥罗莫民族主义半个世纪以来所阐明的立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
National Integration through Political Marginalization: Contradictions of Nation-Building in Ethiopia
ABSTRACT:In Ethiopia, the nationalities question has been the most contentious political force shaping politics, engendering conflicts and obstructing national integration. In this article, I provide a historical analysis of the emergence in the 1960s of two dominant positions, "ethionationalism" and ethnonationalism, which coalesced into competing political visions of the character of the Ethiopian state. I posit that advocates of the two positions wrested power and tried to shape the state, writing constitutions and introducing political systems for governing Ethiopia. I discuss the transformation of these political positions and realignments as those in power maneuvered to deny Oromo nationalists access to political power, rejecting the idea of self-determination as a solution to the nationalities question. I conclude that the competing nationalisms have failed, and that the only way to create a stable Ethiopian state remains the position that Oromo nationalism has enunciated for half a century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Northeast African Studies
Northeast African Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信