约旦公立和私立医院医生对药物警戒的知识、态度和实践评估

Q4 Medicine
Hayaa A Banat, Mohammed Alsbou, Nidaa Bawaresh, F. El‑Dahiyat, J. Jaber, Khalid Tawalbeh, Dana S Ahmad, A. Batarseh
{"title":"约旦公立和私立医院医生对药物警戒的知识、态度和实践评估","authors":"Hayaa A Banat, Mohammed Alsbou, Nidaa Bawaresh, F. El‑Dahiyat, J. Jaber, Khalid Tawalbeh, Dana S Ahmad, A. Batarseh","doi":"10.35516/jmj.v56i4.468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward pharmacovigilance (PV) among healthcare providers are strongly associated with reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). This study was conducted to evaluate knowledge, attitude, and practice toward pharmacovigilance and to identify barriers for ADR reporting among physicians working at public and private hospitals in Jordan. This study was conducted using an online questionnaire in the Arabic language, designed by the members of the Health Hazard Evaluation Committee of the Jordan Food and Drug Administration (JFDA) between (August 2016 to December 2017). The questionnaire was completed using Google Forms online. A total of 341 physicians completed the questionnaire online. The rate of reporting of ADRs is low among physicians, only 4.7% have reported an ADR. The majority of physicians had never heard the term PV before. Respondents also lacked awareness of the existence of a PV centre in Jordan, and were unaware that monitoring of ADRs is carried out by the JFDA. Although the majority of physicians had never seen the ADR form, many had positive attitudes toward reporting ADRs. According to participant responses, the main barriers to reporting are: 1) not knowing how to report, 2) not knowing the importance of reporting, 3) unavailability of the ADR form, and 4) general time pressure in the work environment. Although there is a low rate of ADR reporting among physicians, doctors have a positive attitude toward PV and are willing to implement ADR reporting in their practices. More education and training sessions are needed in order to raise physician awareness and knowledge of PV, and to enhance ADR reporting.","PeriodicalId":39681,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Physicians toward Pharmacovigilance in Public and Private Hospitals in Jordan\",\"authors\":\"Hayaa A Banat, Mohammed Alsbou, Nidaa Bawaresh, F. El‑Dahiyat, J. Jaber, Khalid Tawalbeh, Dana S Ahmad, A. Batarseh\",\"doi\":\"10.35516/jmj.v56i4.468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward pharmacovigilance (PV) among healthcare providers are strongly associated with reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). This study was conducted to evaluate knowledge, attitude, and practice toward pharmacovigilance and to identify barriers for ADR reporting among physicians working at public and private hospitals in Jordan. This study was conducted using an online questionnaire in the Arabic language, designed by the members of the Health Hazard Evaluation Committee of the Jordan Food and Drug Administration (JFDA) between (August 2016 to December 2017). The questionnaire was completed using Google Forms online. A total of 341 physicians completed the questionnaire online. The rate of reporting of ADRs is low among physicians, only 4.7% have reported an ADR. The majority of physicians had never heard the term PV before. Respondents also lacked awareness of the existence of a PV centre in Jordan, and were unaware that monitoring of ADRs is carried out by the JFDA. Although the majority of physicians had never seen the ADR form, many had positive attitudes toward reporting ADRs. According to participant responses, the main barriers to reporting are: 1) not knowing how to report, 2) not knowing the importance of reporting, 3) unavailability of the ADR form, and 4) general time pressure in the work environment. Although there is a low rate of ADR reporting among physicians, doctors have a positive attitude toward PV and are willing to implement ADR reporting in their practices. More education and training sessions are needed in order to raise physician awareness and knowledge of PV, and to enhance ADR reporting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jordan Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jordan Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35516/jmj.v56i4.468\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35516/jmj.v56i4.468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗保健提供者对药物警戒(PV)的知识、态度和实践与药物不良反应(adr)的报告密切相关。本研究旨在评估约旦公立和私立医院医生对药物警戒的知识、态度和实践,并确定不良反应报告的障碍。本研究使用阿拉伯语在线问卷进行,由约旦食品和药物管理局(JFDA)健康危害评估委员会成员在2016年8月至2017年12月期间设计。问卷使用谷歌在线表格完成。共有341名医生在线完成了问卷调查。报告不良反应的医生比例较低,仅有4.7%的医生报告过不良反应。大多数医生以前从未听说过PV这个术语。答复者还缺乏对约旦存在PV中心的认识,并且不知道JFDA对adr进行了监测。虽然大多数医生从未见过ADR表格,但许多医生对报告ADR持积极态度。根据参与者的回答,报告的主要障碍是:1)不知道如何报告,2)不知道报告的重要性,3)无法获得ADR表格,以及4)工作环境中的普遍时间压力。虽然医生的ADR报告率较低,但医生对PV持积极态度,并愿意在实践中实施ADR报告。需要更多的教育和培训课程,以提高医生对PV的认识和知识,并加强ADR报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Physicians toward Pharmacovigilance in Public and Private Hospitals in Jordan
Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward pharmacovigilance (PV) among healthcare providers are strongly associated with reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). This study was conducted to evaluate knowledge, attitude, and practice toward pharmacovigilance and to identify barriers for ADR reporting among physicians working at public and private hospitals in Jordan. This study was conducted using an online questionnaire in the Arabic language, designed by the members of the Health Hazard Evaluation Committee of the Jordan Food and Drug Administration (JFDA) between (August 2016 to December 2017). The questionnaire was completed using Google Forms online. A total of 341 physicians completed the questionnaire online. The rate of reporting of ADRs is low among physicians, only 4.7% have reported an ADR. The majority of physicians had never heard the term PV before. Respondents also lacked awareness of the existence of a PV centre in Jordan, and were unaware that monitoring of ADRs is carried out by the JFDA. Although the majority of physicians had never seen the ADR form, many had positive attitudes toward reporting ADRs. According to participant responses, the main barriers to reporting are: 1) not knowing how to report, 2) not knowing the importance of reporting, 3) unavailability of the ADR form, and 4) general time pressure in the work environment. Although there is a low rate of ADR reporting among physicians, doctors have a positive attitude toward PV and are willing to implement ADR reporting in their practices. More education and training sessions are needed in order to raise physician awareness and knowledge of PV, and to enhance ADR reporting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jordan Medical Journal
Jordan Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信