自由间接话语报道的话语结构

Q2 Arts and Humanities
S. Bimpikou, E. Maier, P. Hendriks
{"title":"自由间接话语报道的话语结构","authors":"S. Bimpikou, E. Maier, P. Hendriks","doi":"10.1075/avt.00048.bim","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We investigate the discourse structure of Free Indirect Discourse passages in narratives. We argue that Free\n Indirect Discourse reports consist of two separate propositional discourse units: an (explicit or implicit) frame segment and a\n reported content. These segments are connected at the level of discourse structure by a non-veridical, subordinating discourse\n relation of Attribution, familiar from recent SDRT analyses of indirect discourse constructions in natural conversation (Hunter, 2016). We conducted an experiment to detect the covert presence of a\n subordinating frame segment based on its effects on pronoun resolution. We compared (unframed) Free Indirect Discourse with\n overtly framed Indirect Discourse and a non-reportative segment. We found that the first two indeed pattern alike in terms of\n pronoun resolution, which we take as evidence against the pragmatic context split approach of Schlenker (2004) and Eckardt (2014), and in favor of our discourse\n structural Attribution analysis.","PeriodicalId":35138,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics in the Netherlands","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The discourse structure of free indirect discourse reports\",\"authors\":\"S. Bimpikou, E. Maier, P. Hendriks\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/avt.00048.bim\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We investigate the discourse structure of Free Indirect Discourse passages in narratives. We argue that Free\\n Indirect Discourse reports consist of two separate propositional discourse units: an (explicit or implicit) frame segment and a\\n reported content. These segments are connected at the level of discourse structure by a non-veridical, subordinating discourse\\n relation of Attribution, familiar from recent SDRT analyses of indirect discourse constructions in natural conversation (Hunter, 2016). We conducted an experiment to detect the covert presence of a\\n subordinating frame segment based on its effects on pronoun resolution. We compared (unframed) Free Indirect Discourse with\\n overtly framed Indirect Discourse and a non-reportative segment. We found that the first two indeed pattern alike in terms of\\n pronoun resolution, which we take as evidence against the pragmatic context split approach of Schlenker (2004) and Eckardt (2014), and in favor of our discourse\\n structural Attribution analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistics in the Netherlands\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistics in the Netherlands\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00048.bim\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics in the Netherlands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00048.bim","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

我们研究了叙事中自由间接语篇的话语结构。我们认为自由间接语篇由两个独立的命题语篇单元组成:一个(显性或隐性)框架片段和一个被报道的内容。这些片段在语篇结构的层面上通过一种非真实的、从属的归因语篇关系连接起来,这在最近对自然会话中间接语篇结构的srt分析中很常见(Hunter, 2016)。我们进行了一个实验来检测从属框架段的隐蔽存在,基于它对代词分辨率的影响。我们比较了(无框架的)自由间接语篇、明显框架的间接语篇和非报告语段。我们发现前两种模式在代词解析方面确实相似,我们将其作为反对Schlenker(2004)和Eckardt(2014)语用语境分裂方法的证据,并支持我们的语篇结构归因分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The discourse structure of free indirect discourse reports
We investigate the discourse structure of Free Indirect Discourse passages in narratives. We argue that Free Indirect Discourse reports consist of two separate propositional discourse units: an (explicit or implicit) frame segment and a reported content. These segments are connected at the level of discourse structure by a non-veridical, subordinating discourse relation of Attribution, familiar from recent SDRT analyses of indirect discourse constructions in natural conversation (Hunter, 2016). We conducted an experiment to detect the covert presence of a subordinating frame segment based on its effects on pronoun resolution. We compared (unframed) Free Indirect Discourse with overtly framed Indirect Discourse and a non-reportative segment. We found that the first two indeed pattern alike in terms of pronoun resolution, which we take as evidence against the pragmatic context split approach of Schlenker (2004) and Eckardt (2014), and in favor of our discourse structural Attribution analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistics in the Netherlands
Linguistics in the Netherlands Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Linguistics in the Netherlands is a series of annual publications, sponsored by the Dutch Linguistics Association (Algemene Vereniging voor Taalwetenschap) and published by John Benjamins Publishing Company since Volume 8 in 1991. Each volume contains a careful selection through peer review of papers presented at the annual meeting of the society. The aim of the annual meeting is to provide members with an opportunity to report on their work in progress. Each volume presents an overview of research in different fields of linguistics in the Netherlands containing articles on phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax and semantics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信