弥合这一差距:为应对PICC中心线相关血流感染的高发病率,引入了一种抗菌性外周插入中心导管(PICC)

Q3 Medicine
M. DeVries, Thomas K Sleweon
{"title":"弥合这一差距:为应对PICC中心线相关血流感染的高发病率,引入了一种抗菌性外周插入中心导管(PICC)","authors":"M. DeVries, Thomas K Sleweon","doi":"10.2309/java-d-21-00004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \n \n Objective: To reduce the incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) in peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) through the introduction of an antimicrobial (AM) catheter as recommended in evidence-based guidelines and standards.\n Design: Quality improvement project comparing incidence of infections pre-implementation and postimplementation of the new catheter.\n Setting: A 582-bed community teaching hospital in Northwest Indiana.\n Methods: Pre-implementation analysis of surveillance data indicated that 50% of CLABSIs occurred in patients with PICCs in situ. A gap analysis was performed to review institutional practices against evidence-based recommendations. The use of an AM catheter was supported in each of the documents consulted. After introduction of the new device, performance was measured in a prospective manner using standardized Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance protocols for CLABSI and internal data sources for other measures.\n Results: After 30 months of data collection, the PICC CLABSI incidence reduced from a baseline rate of 1.83/1000 PICC days to 0.162/1000 PICC days (91.15% reduction, P = 0.0002).\n Conclusion: Combined with continued compliance with basic prevention strategies (i.e., use of a central line insertion checklist/insertion bundle) and optimization of device selection and lumen justification, the introduction of an antimicrobial/antithrombogenic (AM/AT) PICC was associated with a significant reduction in CLABSI.\n","PeriodicalId":35321,"journal":{"name":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the Gap: Introduction of an Antimicrobial Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) in Response to High PICC Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Incidence\",\"authors\":\"M. DeVries, Thomas K Sleweon\",\"doi\":\"10.2309/java-d-21-00004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n Objective: To reduce the incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) in peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) through the introduction of an antimicrobial (AM) catheter as recommended in evidence-based guidelines and standards.\\n Design: Quality improvement project comparing incidence of infections pre-implementation and postimplementation of the new catheter.\\n Setting: A 582-bed community teaching hospital in Northwest Indiana.\\n Methods: Pre-implementation analysis of surveillance data indicated that 50% of CLABSIs occurred in patients with PICCs in situ. A gap analysis was performed to review institutional practices against evidence-based recommendations. The use of an AM catheter was supported in each of the documents consulted. After introduction of the new device, performance was measured in a prospective manner using standardized Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance protocols for CLABSI and internal data sources for other measures.\\n Results: After 30 months of data collection, the PICC CLABSI incidence reduced from a baseline rate of 1.83/1000 PICC days to 0.162/1000 PICC days (91.15% reduction, P = 0.0002).\\n Conclusion: Combined with continued compliance with basic prevention strategies (i.e., use of a central line insertion checklist/insertion bundle) and optimization of device selection and lumen justification, the introduction of an antimicrobial/antithrombogenic (AM/AT) PICC was associated with a significant reduction in CLABSI.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":35321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2309/java-d-21-00004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2309/java-d-21-00004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:根据循证指南和标准的推荐,通过引入抗菌(AM)导管,降低外周插入中心导管(PICC)中心线相关血流感染(CLABSI)的发生率。设计:质量改进项目,比较新导管实施前后感染发生率。环境:印第安纳州西北部一所拥有582张床位的社区教学医院。方法:实施前的监测数据分析表明,50%的clabsi发生在原位PICCs患者中。进行了差距分析,以审查机构实践与循证建议。所咨询的每一份文件都支持使用AM导管。在引入新设备后,使用标准化的疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)国家医疗安全网络(NHSN) CLABSI监测协议和其他措施的内部数据源,以前瞻性方式测量性能。结果:数据收集30个月后,PICC CLABSI发生率从基线的1.83/1000 PICC天降低到0.162/1000 PICC天(降低91.15%,P = 0.0002)。结论:结合持续遵守基本预防策略(即使用中心静脉导管插入检查表/插入束)、优化器械选择和管腔调整,引入抗菌/抗血栓形成(AM/AT) PICC与CLABSI的显著降低相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging the Gap: Introduction of an Antimicrobial Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) in Response to High PICC Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Incidence
Objective: To reduce the incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) in peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) through the introduction of an antimicrobial (AM) catheter as recommended in evidence-based guidelines and standards. Design: Quality improvement project comparing incidence of infections pre-implementation and postimplementation of the new catheter. Setting: A 582-bed community teaching hospital in Northwest Indiana. Methods: Pre-implementation analysis of surveillance data indicated that 50% of CLABSIs occurred in patients with PICCs in situ. A gap analysis was performed to review institutional practices against evidence-based recommendations. The use of an AM catheter was supported in each of the documents consulted. After introduction of the new device, performance was measured in a prospective manner using standardized Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance protocols for CLABSI and internal data sources for other measures. Results: After 30 months of data collection, the PICC CLABSI incidence reduced from a baseline rate of 1.83/1000 PICC days to 0.162/1000 PICC days (91.15% reduction, P = 0.0002). Conclusion: Combined with continued compliance with basic prevention strategies (i.e., use of a central line insertion checklist/insertion bundle) and optimization of device selection and lumen justification, the introduction of an antimicrobial/antithrombogenic (AM/AT) PICC was associated with a significant reduction in CLABSI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access
JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Association for Vascular Access (AVA) is an association of healthcare professionals founded in 1985 to promote the emerging vascular access specialty. Today, its multidisciplinary membership advances research, professional and public education to shape practice and enhance patient outcomes, and partners with the device manufacturing community to bring about evidence-based innovations in vascular access.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信