探讨专业怀疑对会计专业学生网络安全表现的影响

IF 1.6 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Yueqi Li, S. Goel, K. Williams
{"title":"探讨专业怀疑对会计专业学生网络安全表现的影响","authors":"Yueqi Li, S. Goel, K. Williams","doi":"10.2308/jeta-2022-043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professional skepticism is a fundamental and critical construct for audit professionals. Although accounting regulators, practitioners, and CPA examinations call for explicit consideration of cyber risks by current and future audit professionals, the current body of literature has not examined the effects of professional skepticism in the context of cybersecurity-related tasks. This study focuses on the effect of professional skepticism on accounting students’ performance in cybersecurity (ASPC). Based on a sample of 115 graduate accounting students, we found that the students did not consistently understand cybersecurity fundamentals. Our study identifies personality traits and operating stress as antecedents of professional skepticism, and these antecedents affect ASPC indirectly through professional skepticism. The results indicate that professional skepticism directly and positively affects ASPC. In addition, cybersecurity knowledge and age positively and directly affect ASPC. The results of this study have implications for academics, accounting education, and the audit profession. Data Availability: Data are available on request from the authors. JEL Classifications: D91; M42; O33.","PeriodicalId":45427,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Antecedents of Professional Skepticism on Accounting Students’ Performance in Cybersecurity\",\"authors\":\"Yueqi Li, S. Goel, K. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/jeta-2022-043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Professional skepticism is a fundamental and critical construct for audit professionals. Although accounting regulators, practitioners, and CPA examinations call for explicit consideration of cyber risks by current and future audit professionals, the current body of literature has not examined the effects of professional skepticism in the context of cybersecurity-related tasks. This study focuses on the effect of professional skepticism on accounting students’ performance in cybersecurity (ASPC). Based on a sample of 115 graduate accounting students, we found that the students did not consistently understand cybersecurity fundamentals. Our study identifies personality traits and operating stress as antecedents of professional skepticism, and these antecedents affect ASPC indirectly through professional skepticism. The results indicate that professional skepticism directly and positively affects ASPC. In addition, cybersecurity knowledge and age positively and directly affect ASPC. The results of this study have implications for academics, accounting education, and the audit profession. Data Availability: Data are available on request from the authors. JEL Classifications: D91; M42; O33.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-2022-043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-2022-043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

职业怀疑是审计专业人员的一种基本和关键的建构。尽管会计监管机构、从业人员和注册会计师考试呼吁当前和未来的审计专业人员明确考虑网络风险,但目前的文献尚未研究专业怀疑在网络安全相关任务背景下的影响。本研究主要探讨专业怀疑态度对会计专业学生网络安全绩效的影响。基于对115名会计专业研究生的抽样调查,我们发现这些学生对网络安全基础知识的理解并不一致。本研究发现人格特质和工作压力是职业怀疑主义的前因,这些前因通过职业怀疑主义间接影响ASPC。结果表明,职业怀疑主义对ASPC有直接的正向影响。此外,网络安全知识和年龄对ASPC有正向和直接的影响。本研究的结果对学术界、会计教育和审计行业具有启示意义。数据可用性:数据可根据作者的要求提供。JEL分类:D91;M42;O33。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Antecedents of Professional Skepticism on Accounting Students’ Performance in Cybersecurity
Professional skepticism is a fundamental and critical construct for audit professionals. Although accounting regulators, practitioners, and CPA examinations call for explicit consideration of cyber risks by current and future audit professionals, the current body of literature has not examined the effects of professional skepticism in the context of cybersecurity-related tasks. This study focuses on the effect of professional skepticism on accounting students’ performance in cybersecurity (ASPC). Based on a sample of 115 graduate accounting students, we found that the students did not consistently understand cybersecurity fundamentals. Our study identifies personality traits and operating stress as antecedents of professional skepticism, and these antecedents affect ASPC indirectly through professional skepticism. The results indicate that professional skepticism directly and positively affects ASPC. In addition, cybersecurity knowledge and age positively and directly affect ASPC. The results of this study have implications for academics, accounting education, and the audit profession. Data Availability: Data are available on request from the authors. JEL Classifications: D91; M42; O33.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
27.80%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信