{"title":"跨部门和关系框架:美国社会工作中的反黑人、定居者殖民主义和新自由主义","authors":"Jennifer Maree Stanley","doi":"10.1080/10428232.2019.1703246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Positivist epistemologies have been argued to advance learning and interventions to improve the health of multiply marginalized and colonized people; however, these long-standing approaches have not served social and health equity. An intersectionality health equity lens understands differences in health to be impacted by the social position of multiply marginalized and colonized people embedded in systems of oppression. Bringing forward the sociohistorical contexts of whiteness and respectability in US social work provides necessary insight into how white supremacy can produce and replicate itself through policy and practice. Whiteness and respectability politics reinforce settler colonialism in the US and provide a foundation for neoliberal, sociopolitical economic policy that monitors, controls, and shapes the lives of multiply marginalized and colonized communities. Critical knowledge development engaging intersectionality is needed for US social workers to participate in structural change without perpetuating inequity and dispossession. Eradicating the violence of capitalism for future generations necessitates a radical relational praxis to deepen the sociopolitical economic analysis of economies of health inequity.","PeriodicalId":44255,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10428232.2019.1703246","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intersectional and Relational Frameworks:Confronting Anti-Blackness, Settler Colonialism, and Neoliberalism in U.S. Social Work\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Maree Stanley\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10428232.2019.1703246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Positivist epistemologies have been argued to advance learning and interventions to improve the health of multiply marginalized and colonized people; however, these long-standing approaches have not served social and health equity. An intersectionality health equity lens understands differences in health to be impacted by the social position of multiply marginalized and colonized people embedded in systems of oppression. Bringing forward the sociohistorical contexts of whiteness and respectability in US social work provides necessary insight into how white supremacy can produce and replicate itself through policy and practice. Whiteness and respectability politics reinforce settler colonialism in the US and provide a foundation for neoliberal, sociopolitical economic policy that monitors, controls, and shapes the lives of multiply marginalized and colonized communities. Critical knowledge development engaging intersectionality is needed for US social workers to participate in structural change without perpetuating inequity and dispossession. Eradicating the violence of capitalism for future generations necessitates a radical relational praxis to deepen the sociopolitical economic analysis of economies of health inequity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Progressive Human Services\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10428232.2019.1703246\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Progressive Human Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2019.1703246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2019.1703246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intersectional and Relational Frameworks:Confronting Anti-Blackness, Settler Colonialism, and Neoliberalism in U.S. Social Work
ABSTRACT Positivist epistemologies have been argued to advance learning and interventions to improve the health of multiply marginalized and colonized people; however, these long-standing approaches have not served social and health equity. An intersectionality health equity lens understands differences in health to be impacted by the social position of multiply marginalized and colonized people embedded in systems of oppression. Bringing forward the sociohistorical contexts of whiteness and respectability in US social work provides necessary insight into how white supremacy can produce and replicate itself through policy and practice. Whiteness and respectability politics reinforce settler colonialism in the US and provide a foundation for neoliberal, sociopolitical economic policy that monitors, controls, and shapes the lives of multiply marginalized and colonized communities. Critical knowledge development engaging intersectionality is needed for US social workers to participate in structural change without perpetuating inequity and dispossession. Eradicating the violence of capitalism for future generations necessitates a radical relational praxis to deepen the sociopolitical economic analysis of economies of health inequity.
期刊介绍:
The only journal of its kind in the United States, the Journal of Progressive Human Services covers political, social, personal, and professional problems in human services from a progressive perspective. The journal stimulates debate about major social issues and contributes to the development of the analytical tools needed for building a caring society based on equality and justice. The journal"s contributors examine oppressed and vulnerable groups, struggles by workers and clients on the job and in the community, dilemmas of practice in conservative contexts, and strategies for ending racism, sexism, ageism, heterosexism, and discrimination of persons who are disabled and psychologically distressed.