“PUSH策略”在住院康复中减少卒中后的对抗性推压的应用

IF 0.3 Q4 REHABILITATION
J. Gillespie, Molly Trammell, C. Swank
{"title":"“PUSH策略”在住院康复中减少卒中后的对抗性推压的应用","authors":"J. Gillespie, Molly Trammell, C. Swank","doi":"10.3233/ppr-220668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: Given the poor functional outcomes associated with contraversive pushing after stroke and lack of evidence guiding physical therapy interventions, the PUSH (Prioritizing Upright, Standing, and Higher-level stepping activities) Strategy was designed to address unmet needs. The aim of this paper is to describe the clinical application of the PUSH Strategy delivered during the physical therapy plan of care within inpatient rehabilitation. METHODS: The PUSH Strategy was applied during clinical practice in a large, urban inpatient rehabilitation hospital for patients demonstrating contraversive pushing after stroke with the goals to (1) reduce contraversive pushing, (2) contribute to facilitation of a community discharge, and (3) improve functional outcomes. Subsequently, outcomes [Burke Lateropulsion Scale (BLS), discharge disposition, and the Mobility and Walk portions of the Continuity Assessment and Record Evaluation (CARE) Tool] were collected at admission and discharge to assess patient progress. RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2020, 11 patients participated in the PUSH Strategy with 73% of patients achieving all three Strategy goals. On average, patients saw improvement in pushing [admit, 7.73 ± 3.3 (moderate pushing); discharge, 1.55 ± 2.4 (no pushing)] and function (admit mobility, 9.9 ± 4.4; discharge, 21.5 ± 5.3 and admit walking 8.1 ± 0.3, discharge 9.6 ± 2.7) during their inpatient rehabilitation stay. Nine were discharged to the community (82% ). CONCLUSIONS: The PUSH Strategy was successfully applied for patients with post-stroke contraversive pushing during inpatient rehabilitation. Overall, patients demonstrated reduced pushing and improved functional outcomes during their rehabilitation and most were discharged to a community setting.","PeriodicalId":38170,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of ‘the PUSH strategy’ to reduce contraversive pushing after stroke during inpatient rehabilitation\",\"authors\":\"J. Gillespie, Molly Trammell, C. Swank\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/ppr-220668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE: Given the poor functional outcomes associated with contraversive pushing after stroke and lack of evidence guiding physical therapy interventions, the PUSH (Prioritizing Upright, Standing, and Higher-level stepping activities) Strategy was designed to address unmet needs. The aim of this paper is to describe the clinical application of the PUSH Strategy delivered during the physical therapy plan of care within inpatient rehabilitation. METHODS: The PUSH Strategy was applied during clinical practice in a large, urban inpatient rehabilitation hospital for patients demonstrating contraversive pushing after stroke with the goals to (1) reduce contraversive pushing, (2) contribute to facilitation of a community discharge, and (3) improve functional outcomes. Subsequently, outcomes [Burke Lateropulsion Scale (BLS), discharge disposition, and the Mobility and Walk portions of the Continuity Assessment and Record Evaluation (CARE) Tool] were collected at admission and discharge to assess patient progress. RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2020, 11 patients participated in the PUSH Strategy with 73% of patients achieving all three Strategy goals. On average, patients saw improvement in pushing [admit, 7.73 ± 3.3 (moderate pushing); discharge, 1.55 ± 2.4 (no pushing)] and function (admit mobility, 9.9 ± 4.4; discharge, 21.5 ± 5.3 and admit walking 8.1 ± 0.3, discharge 9.6 ± 2.7) during their inpatient rehabilitation stay. Nine were discharged to the community (82% ). CONCLUSIONS: The PUSH Strategy was successfully applied for patients with post-stroke contraversive pushing during inpatient rehabilitation. Overall, patients demonstrated reduced pushing and improved functional outcomes during their rehabilitation and most were discharged to a community setting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/ppr-220668\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ppr-220668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:考虑到卒中后与矛盾推动相关的不良功能结果以及缺乏指导物理治疗干预的证据,PUSH(优先考虑直立、站立和更高水平的步行活动)策略旨在解决未满足的需求。本文的目的是描述PUSH策略在住院康复护理的物理治疗计划中交付的临床应用。方法:在一家大型城市康复医院的临床实践中,对卒中后出现矛盾推推的患者应用PUSH策略,目的是:(1)减少矛盾推推,(2)促进社区出院,(3)改善功能预后。随后,在入院和出院时收集结果[伯克侧裂量表(BLS),出院处置,连续性评估和记录评估(CARE)工具的活动和行走部分],以评估患者的进展。结果:在2018年至2020年期间,11名患者参与了PUSH策略,73%的患者实现了所有三个策略目标。平均而言,患者推压有所改善[承认,7.73±3.3(中度推压);放电,1.55±2.4(无推)]和功能(允许移动,9.9±4.4;出院时为21.5±5.3,入院时为8.1±0.3,出院时为9.6±2.7。出院社区9例(82%)。结论:PUSH策略成功应用于脑卒中后患者住院康复期间的对抗性推推。总体而言,患者在康复期间表现出推挤减少和功能改善,大多数患者出院到社区环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of ‘the PUSH strategy’ to reduce contraversive pushing after stroke during inpatient rehabilitation
OBJECTIVE: Given the poor functional outcomes associated with contraversive pushing after stroke and lack of evidence guiding physical therapy interventions, the PUSH (Prioritizing Upright, Standing, and Higher-level stepping activities) Strategy was designed to address unmet needs. The aim of this paper is to describe the clinical application of the PUSH Strategy delivered during the physical therapy plan of care within inpatient rehabilitation. METHODS: The PUSH Strategy was applied during clinical practice in a large, urban inpatient rehabilitation hospital for patients demonstrating contraversive pushing after stroke with the goals to (1) reduce contraversive pushing, (2) contribute to facilitation of a community discharge, and (3) improve functional outcomes. Subsequently, outcomes [Burke Lateropulsion Scale (BLS), discharge disposition, and the Mobility and Walk portions of the Continuity Assessment and Record Evaluation (CARE) Tool] were collected at admission and discharge to assess patient progress. RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2020, 11 patients participated in the PUSH Strategy with 73% of patients achieving all three Strategy goals. On average, patients saw improvement in pushing [admit, 7.73 ± 3.3 (moderate pushing); discharge, 1.55 ± 2.4 (no pushing)] and function (admit mobility, 9.9 ± 4.4; discharge, 21.5 ± 5.3 and admit walking 8.1 ± 0.3, discharge 9.6 ± 2.7) during their inpatient rehabilitation stay. Nine were discharged to the community (82% ). CONCLUSIONS: The PUSH Strategy was successfully applied for patients with post-stroke contraversive pushing during inpatient rehabilitation. Overall, patients demonstrated reduced pushing and improved functional outcomes during their rehabilitation and most were discharged to a community setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiotherapy Practice and Research
Physiotherapy Practice and Research Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信