Sunit Girdhar, A. Barnard, J. Blough, John Loverde, Wayland Dong
{"title":"标准攻丝机和标准冲击球的输入力和地板阻抗测量","authors":"Sunit Girdhar, A. Barnard, J. Blough, John Loverde, Wayland Dong","doi":"10.3397/1/37716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current ASTM and International Standards Organization (ISO) standard im- pact test method for floor-ceiling assemblies does not require the test engineer to measure the input force during the impact. A standard tapping machine or a standard impact ball is used for these tests, but\n these input sources usually do not have any provision to measure the input force. In this work, the input force of these impact methods was measured on seven different assemblies, and a modal hammer was used as a “control” source. The input force and average floor impedance were\n measured and compared to each other. The peak input force levels due to the tapping machine vary by approximately 38 dB from one floor to the other, and the frequency excitation bandwidth varies widely based on the type of floor construction. This shows that there is a need to measure the\n input force and scale the output sound quantity with the input force to get a frequency response function (FRF)-like quantity to compare different floor-ceiling assemblies. For the impact ball, the variation in low-frequency input force levels is almost non-existent, but the impact ball has\n a poor measurement signal-to-noise ratio above 80 Hz one-third octave band. The impedance measured using the impact ball matches closely with the control impedance measured using the modal hammer.","PeriodicalId":49748,"journal":{"name":"Noise Control Engineering Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Input force and floor impedance measurement for the standard tapping machine and the standard impact ball\",\"authors\":\"Sunit Girdhar, A. Barnard, J. Blough, John Loverde, Wayland Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.3397/1/37716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current ASTM and International Standards Organization (ISO) standard im- pact test method for floor-ceiling assemblies does not require the test engineer to measure the input force during the impact. A standard tapping machine or a standard impact ball is used for these tests, but\\n these input sources usually do not have any provision to measure the input force. In this work, the input force of these impact methods was measured on seven different assemblies, and a modal hammer was used as a “control” source. The input force and average floor impedance were\\n measured and compared to each other. The peak input force levels due to the tapping machine vary by approximately 38 dB from one floor to the other, and the frequency excitation bandwidth varies widely based on the type of floor construction. This shows that there is a need to measure the\\n input force and scale the output sound quantity with the input force to get a frequency response function (FRF)-like quantity to compare different floor-ceiling assemblies. For the impact ball, the variation in low-frequency input force levels is almost non-existent, but the impact ball has\\n a poor measurement signal-to-noise ratio above 80 Hz one-third octave band. The impedance measured using the impact ball matches closely with the control impedance measured using the modal hammer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Noise Control Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Noise Control Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3397/1/37716\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noise Control Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3397/1/37716","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Input force and floor impedance measurement for the standard tapping machine and the standard impact ball
The current ASTM and International Standards Organization (ISO) standard im- pact test method for floor-ceiling assemblies does not require the test engineer to measure the input force during the impact. A standard tapping machine or a standard impact ball is used for these tests, but
these input sources usually do not have any provision to measure the input force. In this work, the input force of these impact methods was measured on seven different assemblies, and a modal hammer was used as a “control” source. The input force and average floor impedance were
measured and compared to each other. The peak input force levels due to the tapping machine vary by approximately 38 dB from one floor to the other, and the frequency excitation bandwidth varies widely based on the type of floor construction. This shows that there is a need to measure the
input force and scale the output sound quantity with the input force to get a frequency response function (FRF)-like quantity to compare different floor-ceiling assemblies. For the impact ball, the variation in low-frequency input force levels is almost non-existent, but the impact ball has
a poor measurement signal-to-noise ratio above 80 Hz one-third octave band. The impedance measured using the impact ball matches closely with the control impedance measured using the modal hammer.
期刊介绍:
NCEJ is the pre-eminent academic journal of noise control. It is the International Journal of the Institute of Noise Control Engineering of the USA. It is also produced with the participation and assistance of the Korean Society of Noise and Vibration Engineering (KSNVE).
NCEJ reaches noise control professionals around the world, covering over 50 national noise control societies and institutes.
INCE encourages you to submit your next paper to NCEJ. Choosing NCEJ:
Provides the opportunity to reach a global audience of NCE professionals, academics, and students;
Enhances the prestige of your work;
Validates your work by formal peer review.