厄尔·沃伦的最后一战:鲍威尔诉麦科马克、种族和政治问题主义

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
Olivia O'Hea
{"title":"厄尔·沃伦的最后一战:鲍威尔诉麦科马克、种族和政治问题主义","authors":"Olivia O'Hea","doi":"10.1111/jsch.12292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chief Justice Earl Warren had great expectations for Powell v. McCormack.1 According to his clerks, the Chief believed the case would be his swansong.2 He hoped the opinion would become an illustrious historical document, revered as canonical by future constitutional scholars.3 To Warren’s credit, the case contained all the trappings of a great constitutional showdown. At its center: the gregarious Congressman Adam Clayton Powell, who was formally excluded from his seat after allegations of mismanaging funds.4 And the question—who had the power to unseat a fairly elected congressman?— highlighted the escalating tension between Congress and the Court.5 In a jab at the Court, the House report recommending Powell’s sanctions noted that the final vote would be immune to judicial review.6 By the time the Supreme Court granted cert, New York’s 18th Congressional District had reelected Powell, and by the time the justices heard the oral argument Powell was Handsome and charismatic, Adam Clayton Powell was a Baptist pastor elected to Congress from Harlem, New York, in 1944.","PeriodicalId":41873,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Supreme Court History","volume":"47 1","pages":"44-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Earl Warren's Last Stand: Powell v. McCormack, Race, and the Political Question Doctrine\",\"authors\":\"Olivia O'Hea\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jsch.12292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chief Justice Earl Warren had great expectations for Powell v. McCormack.1 According to his clerks, the Chief believed the case would be his swansong.2 He hoped the opinion would become an illustrious historical document, revered as canonical by future constitutional scholars.3 To Warren’s credit, the case contained all the trappings of a great constitutional showdown. At its center: the gregarious Congressman Adam Clayton Powell, who was formally excluded from his seat after allegations of mismanaging funds.4 And the question—who had the power to unseat a fairly elected congressman?— highlighted the escalating tension between Congress and the Court.5 In a jab at the Court, the House report recommending Powell’s sanctions noted that the final vote would be immune to judicial review.6 By the time the Supreme Court granted cert, New York’s 18th Congressional District had reelected Powell, and by the time the justices heard the oral argument Powell was Handsome and charismatic, Adam Clayton Powell was a Baptist pastor elected to Congress from Harlem, New York, in 1944.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Supreme Court History\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"44-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Supreme Court History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jsch.12292\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Supreme Court History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jsch.12292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

首席大法官厄尔·沃伦(Earl Warren)对鲍威尔诉麦科马克案(Powell v.McCormack)寄予厚望。1据他的书记员称,首席大法官相信这起案件将是他的绝唱。2他希望这一意见能成为一份杰出的历史文件,被未来的宪法学者尊为典范。3值得称赞的是,这起案件包含了一场伟大的宪法对决的所有表象。其核心是:合群的国会议员亚当·克莱顿·鲍威尔,他因被指控资金管理不善而被正式排除在外。4还有一个问题——谁有权罢免一位公正当选的国会议员?——强调了国会和最高法院之间不断升级的紧张关系。5在对最高法院的抨击中,众议院建议对鲍威尔实施制裁的报告指出,最终投票将不受司法审查,当法官们听到鲍威尔英俊而富有魅力的口头辩论时,亚当·克莱顿·鲍威尔是1944年从纽约哈莱姆当选为国会议员的浸礼会牧师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Earl Warren's Last Stand: Powell v. McCormack, Race, and the Political Question Doctrine

Earl Warren's Last Stand: Powell v. McCormack, Race, and the Political Question Doctrine
Chief Justice Earl Warren had great expectations for Powell v. McCormack.1 According to his clerks, the Chief believed the case would be his swansong.2 He hoped the opinion would become an illustrious historical document, revered as canonical by future constitutional scholars.3 To Warren’s credit, the case contained all the trappings of a great constitutional showdown. At its center: the gregarious Congressman Adam Clayton Powell, who was formally excluded from his seat after allegations of mismanaging funds.4 And the question—who had the power to unseat a fairly elected congressman?— highlighted the escalating tension between Congress and the Court.5 In a jab at the Court, the House report recommending Powell’s sanctions noted that the final vote would be immune to judicial review.6 By the time the Supreme Court granted cert, New York’s 18th Congressional District had reelected Powell, and by the time the justices heard the oral argument Powell was Handsome and charismatic, Adam Clayton Powell was a Baptist pastor elected to Congress from Harlem, New York, in 1944.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信