艺术史中“作者功能”概念的批判

IF 0.3 3区 艺术学 0 ART
Hammam Aldouri
{"title":"艺术史中“作者功能”概念的批判","authors":"Hammam Aldouri","doi":"10.1080/09528822.2021.2000135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Since the 1970s, the incorporation of European critical theory into the academic discipline of art history within the Anglophone context has become an established scholarly convention. This article aims to attend to one example of this institutionalised referencing practice: Michel Foucault’s notion of the ‘author function’ as explicated in the famous essay, ‘What is an Author?’ From Craig Owen’s attempt to develop a ‘materialist cultural practice’ to Caroline Jones’s recent exploration of the ‘artist-function’ in the reception of Robert Smithson’s work, Foucault’s concept has proved to be a rich source for art historians. That being said, the deployment of ‘author function’ has, as I will show, come at the price of a more careful examination of Foucault’s essay – one that does not permit the seamless reproduction, via a citational practice, of a concept from one study to the next.","PeriodicalId":45739,"journal":{"name":"Third Text","volume":"35 1","pages":"591 - 604"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critique of the ‘Author Function’ Concept in Art History\",\"authors\":\"Hammam Aldouri\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09528822.2021.2000135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Since the 1970s, the incorporation of European critical theory into the academic discipline of art history within the Anglophone context has become an established scholarly convention. This article aims to attend to one example of this institutionalised referencing practice: Michel Foucault’s notion of the ‘author function’ as explicated in the famous essay, ‘What is an Author?’ From Craig Owen’s attempt to develop a ‘materialist cultural practice’ to Caroline Jones’s recent exploration of the ‘artist-function’ in the reception of Robert Smithson’s work, Foucault’s concept has proved to be a rich source for art historians. That being said, the deployment of ‘author function’ has, as I will show, come at the price of a more careful examination of Foucault’s essay – one that does not permit the seamless reproduction, via a citational practice, of a concept from one study to the next.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Third Text\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"591 - 604\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Third Text\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09528822.2021.2000135\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Third Text","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09528822.2021.2000135","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要自20世纪70年代以来,将欧洲批判理论纳入英语背景下的艺术史学术学科已成为一种既定的学术惯例。本文旨在关注这种制度化参考实践的一个例子:米歇尔·福柯的“作者功能”概念,正如著名文章《什么是作者?》中所阐述的那样从克雷格·欧文(Craig Owen)试图发展“唯物主义文化实践”,到卡罗琳·琼斯(Caroline Jones)最近在接受罗伯特·史密森(Robert Smithson)作品时对“艺术家功能”的探索,福柯的概念已被证明是艺术史学家的丰富来源。话虽如此,正如我将要展示的那样,“作者功能”的部署是以更仔细地审查福柯的文章为代价的——这篇文章不允许通过引用实践将一个概念从一项研究无缝复制到下一项研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Critique of the ‘Author Function’ Concept in Art History
Abstract Since the 1970s, the incorporation of European critical theory into the academic discipline of art history within the Anglophone context has become an established scholarly convention. This article aims to attend to one example of this institutionalised referencing practice: Michel Foucault’s notion of the ‘author function’ as explicated in the famous essay, ‘What is an Author?’ From Craig Owen’s attempt to develop a ‘materialist cultural practice’ to Caroline Jones’s recent exploration of the ‘artist-function’ in the reception of Robert Smithson’s work, Foucault’s concept has proved to be a rich source for art historians. That being said, the deployment of ‘author function’ has, as I will show, come at the price of a more careful examination of Foucault’s essay – one that does not permit the seamless reproduction, via a citational practice, of a concept from one study to the next.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Third Text
Third Text ART-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Third Text is an international scholarly journal dedicated to providing critical perspectives on art and visual culture. The journal examines the theoretical and historical ground by which the West legitimises its position as the ultimate arbiter of what is significant within this field. Established in 1987, the journal provides a forum for the discussion and (re)appraisal of theory and practice of art, art history and criticism, and the work of artists hitherto marginalised through racial, gender, religious and cultural differences. Dealing with diversity of art practices - visual arts, sculpture, installation, performance, photography, video and film.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信