在“强制联盟”和“协商联盟”之间:重新评估围绕国际联盟“改革”的辩论

IF 1.7 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

International Relations of the Asia-Pacific Pub Date : 2020-08-09 DOI:10.1093/irap/lcaa008

Shunsuke Obiya

{"title":"在“强制联盟”和“协商联盟”之间:重新评估围绕国际联盟“改革”的辩论","authors":"Shunsuke Obiya","doi":"10.1093/irap/lcaa008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article addresses debates surrounding the reform of the League of Nations from the viewpoint of Britain and China. They focused on the pros and cons of collective security because the failure of the League to stop Japanese invasion of Manchuria and Italian invasion of Abyssinia threatened the collapse of the League. There were two contrasting visions in debates, the ‘Coercive League’ and the ‘Consultative League’. The ‘Coercive League’ was the course to reinforce collective security to prevent further aggression. Conversely, the ‘Consultative League’ argument was to weaken collective security and induce Germany, Italy, and Japan to cooperate with the League. Deliberations took place in both the Council, in which great powers exerted a strong presence, and the Assembly, in which small powers made their voices heard. Therefore, this article deals with Britain as an example of a great power and China as one of a small power.","PeriodicalId":51799,"journal":{"name":"International Relations of the Asia-Pacific","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/irap/lcaa008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between ‘Coercive League’ and ‘Consultative League’: a reappraisal of debates surrounding the ‘Reform’ of the League of Nations\",\"authors\":\"Shunsuke Obiya\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/irap/lcaa008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article addresses debates surrounding the reform of the League of Nations from the viewpoint of Britain and China. They focused on the pros and cons of collective security because the failure of the League to stop Japanese invasion of Manchuria and Italian invasion of Abyssinia threatened the collapse of the League. There were two contrasting visions in debates, the ‘Coercive League’ and the ‘Consultative League’. The ‘Coercive League’ was the course to reinforce collective security to prevent further aggression. Conversely, the ‘Consultative League’ argument was to weaken collective security and induce Germany, Italy, and Japan to cooperate with the League. Deliberations took place in both the Council, in which great powers exerted a strong presence, and the Assembly, in which small powers made their voices heard. Therefore, this article deals with Britain as an example of a great power and China as one of a small power.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Relations of the Asia-Pacific\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/irap/lcaa008\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Relations of the Asia-Pacific\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcaa008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Relations of the Asia-Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcaa008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从中英两国的角度论述了围绕国联改革的争论。他们集中讨论集体安全的利弊，因为国联未能阻止日本对满洲的入侵和意大利对阿比西尼亚的入侵威胁着国联的崩溃。辩论中出现了两种截然不同的观点，即“强制联盟”和“协商联盟”。“强制联盟”是加强集体安全以防止进一步侵略的途径。相反，“协商联盟”的论点是削弱集体安全，诱使德国、意大利和日本与联盟合作。安理会和大会都进行了审议，大国在安理会中发挥了强有力的作用，而小国在大会中发表了自己的意见。因此，本文以英国为例，以大国为例，以中国为例。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Between ‘Coercive League’ and ‘Consultative League’: a reappraisal of debates surrounding the ‘Reform’ of the League of Nations

This article addresses debates surrounding the reform of the League of Nations from the viewpoint of Britain and China. They focused on the pros and cons of collective security because the failure of the League to stop Japanese invasion of Manchuria and Italian invasion of Abyssinia threatened the collapse of the League. There were two contrasting visions in debates, the ‘Coercive League’ and the ‘Consultative League’. The ‘Coercive League’ was the course to reinforce collective security to prevent further aggression. Conversely, the ‘Consultative League’ argument was to weaken collective security and induce Germany, Italy, and Japan to cooperate with the League. Deliberations took place in both the Council, in which great powers exerted a strong presence, and the Assembly, in which small powers made their voices heard. Therefore, this article deals with Britain as an example of a great power and China as one of a small power.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Relations of the Asia-Pacific INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

7.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： International Relations of the Asia-Pacific is an exciting journal that addresses the major issues and developments taking place in the Asia-Pacific. It provides frontier knowledge of and fresh insights into the Asia-Pacific. The journal is a meeting place where various issues are debated from refreshingly diverging angles, backed up by rigorous scholarship. The journal is open to all methodological approaches and schools of thought, and to ideas that are expressed in plain and clear language.