了解住院的认知障碍和/或痴呆老年人的保健结果:一项混合方法研究

E. Reynish, Simona Hapca, Rebecca C. Walesby, Angela Pusram, F. Bu, J. Burton, V. Cvoro, James Galloway, Henriette Ebbesen Laidlaw, Marion Latimer, Siobhan McDermott, A. Rutherford, G. Wilcock, P. Donnan, B. Guthrie
{"title":"了解住院的认知障碍和/或痴呆老年人的保健结果:一项混合方法研究","authors":"E. Reynish, Simona Hapca, Rebecca C. Walesby, Angela Pusram, F. Bu, J. Burton, V. Cvoro, James Galloway, Henriette Ebbesen Laidlaw, Marion Latimer, Siobhan McDermott, A. Rutherford, G. Wilcock, P. Donnan, B. Guthrie","doi":"10.3310/HSDR09080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Cognitive impairment is common in older people admitted to hospital, but previous research has focused on single conditions. Objective This project sits in phase 0/1 of the Medical Research Council Framework for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions. It aims to develop an understanding of current health-care outcomes. This will be used in the future development of a multidomain intervention for people with confusion (dementia and cognitive impairment) in general hospitals. The research was conducted from January 2015 to June 2018 and used data from people admitted between 2012 and 2013. Design For the review of outcomes, the systematic review identified peer-reviewed quantitative epidemiology measuring prevalence and associations with outcomes. Screening for duplication and relevance was followed by full-text review, quality assessment and a narrative review (141 papers). A survey sought opinion on the key outcomes for people with dementia and/or confusion and their carers in the acute hospital (n = 78). For the analysis of outcomes including cost, the prospective cohort study was in a medical admissions unit in an acute hospital in one Scottish health board covering 10% of the Scottish population. The participants (n = 6724) were older people (aged ≥ 65 years) with or without a cognitive spectrum disorder who were admitted as medical emergencies between January 2012 and December 2013 and who underwent a structured nurse assessment. ‘Cognitive spectrum disorder’ was defined as any combination of delirium, known dementia or an Abbreviated Mental Test score of < 8 out of 10 points. The main outcome measures were living at home 30 days after discharge, mortality within 2 years of admission, length of stay, re-admission within 2 years of admission and cost. Data sources Scottish Morbidity Records 01 was linked to the Older Persons Routine Acute Assessment data set. Results In the systematic review, methodological heterogeneity, especially concerning diagnostic criteria, means that there is significant overlap in conditions of patients presenting to general hospitals with confusion. Patients and their families expect that patients are discharged in the same or a better condition than they were in on admission or, failing that, that they have a satisfactory experience of their admission. Cognitive spectrum disorders were present in more than one-third of patients aged ≥ 65 years, and in over half of those aged ≥ 85 years. Outcomes were worse in those patients with cognitive spectrum disorders than in those without: length of stay 25.0 vs. 11.8 days, 30-day mortality 13.6% vs. 9.0%, 1-year mortality 40.0% vs. 26.0%, 1-year mortality or re-admission 62.4% vs. 51.5%, respectively (all p < 0.01). There was relatively little difference by cognitive spectrum disorder type; for example, the presence of any cognitive spectrum disorder was associated with an increased mortality over the entire period of follow-up, but with different temporal patterns depending on the type of cognitive spectrum disorder. The cost of admission was higher for those with cognitive spectrum disorders, but the average daily cost was lower. Limitations A lack of diagnosis and/or standardisation of diagnosis for dementia and/or delirium was a limitation for the systematic review, the quantitative study and the economic study. The economic study was limited to in-hospital costs as data for social or informal care costs were unavailable. The survey was conducted online, limiting its reach to older carers and those people with cognitive spectrum disorders. Conclusions Cognitive spectrum disorders are common in older inpatients and are associated with considerably worse health-care outcomes, with significant overlap between individual cognitive spectrum disorders. This suggests the need for health-care systems to systematically identify and develop care pathways for older people with cognitive spectrum disorders, and avoid focusing on only condition-specific pathways. Future work Development and evaluation of a multidomain intervention for the management of patients with cognitive spectrum disorders in hospital. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015024492. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 8. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.","PeriodicalId":12880,"journal":{"name":"Health Services and Delivery Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding health-care outcomes of older people with cognitive impairment and/or dementia admitted to hospital: a mixed-methods study\",\"authors\":\"E. Reynish, Simona Hapca, Rebecca C. Walesby, Angela Pusram, F. Bu, J. Burton, V. Cvoro, James Galloway, Henriette Ebbesen Laidlaw, Marion Latimer, Siobhan McDermott, A. Rutherford, G. Wilcock, P. Donnan, B. Guthrie\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/HSDR09080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Cognitive impairment is common in older people admitted to hospital, but previous research has focused on single conditions. Objective This project sits in phase 0/1 of the Medical Research Council Framework for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions. It aims to develop an understanding of current health-care outcomes. This will be used in the future development of a multidomain intervention for people with confusion (dementia and cognitive impairment) in general hospitals. The research was conducted from January 2015 to June 2018 and used data from people admitted between 2012 and 2013. Design For the review of outcomes, the systematic review identified peer-reviewed quantitative epidemiology measuring prevalence and associations with outcomes. Screening for duplication and relevance was followed by full-text review, quality assessment and a narrative review (141 papers). A survey sought opinion on the key outcomes for people with dementia and/or confusion and their carers in the acute hospital (n = 78). For the analysis of outcomes including cost, the prospective cohort study was in a medical admissions unit in an acute hospital in one Scottish health board covering 10% of the Scottish population. The participants (n = 6724) were older people (aged ≥ 65 years) with or without a cognitive spectrum disorder who were admitted as medical emergencies between January 2012 and December 2013 and who underwent a structured nurse assessment. ‘Cognitive spectrum disorder’ was defined as any combination of delirium, known dementia or an Abbreviated Mental Test score of < 8 out of 10 points. The main outcome measures were living at home 30 days after discharge, mortality within 2 years of admission, length of stay, re-admission within 2 years of admission and cost. Data sources Scottish Morbidity Records 01 was linked to the Older Persons Routine Acute Assessment data set. Results In the systematic review, methodological heterogeneity, especially concerning diagnostic criteria, means that there is significant overlap in conditions of patients presenting to general hospitals with confusion. Patients and their families expect that patients are discharged in the same or a better condition than they were in on admission or, failing that, that they have a satisfactory experience of their admission. Cognitive spectrum disorders were present in more than one-third of patients aged ≥ 65 years, and in over half of those aged ≥ 85 years. Outcomes were worse in those patients with cognitive spectrum disorders than in those without: length of stay 25.0 vs. 11.8 days, 30-day mortality 13.6% vs. 9.0%, 1-year mortality 40.0% vs. 26.0%, 1-year mortality or re-admission 62.4% vs. 51.5%, respectively (all p < 0.01). There was relatively little difference by cognitive spectrum disorder type; for example, the presence of any cognitive spectrum disorder was associated with an increased mortality over the entire period of follow-up, but with different temporal patterns depending on the type of cognitive spectrum disorder. The cost of admission was higher for those with cognitive spectrum disorders, but the average daily cost was lower. Limitations A lack of diagnosis and/or standardisation of diagnosis for dementia and/or delirium was a limitation for the systematic review, the quantitative study and the economic study. The economic study was limited to in-hospital costs as data for social or informal care costs were unavailable. The survey was conducted online, limiting its reach to older carers and those people with cognitive spectrum disorders. Conclusions Cognitive spectrum disorders are common in older inpatients and are associated with considerably worse health-care outcomes, with significant overlap between individual cognitive spectrum disorders. This suggests the need for health-care systems to systematically identify and develop care pathways for older people with cognitive spectrum disorders, and avoid focusing on only condition-specific pathways. Future work Development and evaluation of a multidomain intervention for the management of patients with cognitive spectrum disorders in hospital. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015024492. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 8. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services and Delivery Research\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"1-280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services and Delivery Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/HSDR09080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services and Delivery Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/HSDR09080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景认知障碍在住院的老年人中很常见,但以前的研究主要集中在单一情况下。目的本项目属于医学研究委员会复杂干预措施开发和评估框架的0/1阶段。它旨在加深对当前医疗保健结果的理解。这将用于未来为综合医院的困惑症(痴呆症和认知障碍)患者开发多领域干预措施。这项研究于2015年1月至2018年6月进行,使用了2012年至2013年间入院人员的数据。设计为了对结果进行审查,系统审查确定了同行评审的量化流行病学,测量流行率和与结果的相关性。在筛选重复和相关性之后,进行了全文审查、质量评估和叙述性审查(141篇论文)。一项调查就痴呆症和/或困惑症患者及其护理人员在急性医院的主要结果征求了意见(n = 78)。为了分析包括成本在内的结果,这项前瞻性队列研究是在苏格兰一个卫生委员会的一家急性医院的入院室进行的,覆盖了10%的苏格兰人口。参与者(n = 6724)为老年人(年龄≥ 65岁),患有或不患有认知谱系障碍,在2012年1月至2013年12月期间因医疗紧急情况入院,并接受了结构化护士评估认知谱系障碍”被定义为谵妄、已知痴呆或简称心理测试分数为< 10分中的8分。主要结果指标为出院后30天在家生活、入院后2年内死亡率、住院时间、入院后两年内再次入院和费用。数据来源苏格兰发病率记录01与老年人常规急性评估数据集有关。结果在系统综述中,方法学的异质性,特别是在诊断标准方面,意味着向综合医院就诊的患者的情况存在显著重叠。患者及其家属希望患者出院时的情况与入院时相同或更好,否则,他们会有令人满意的入院体验。超过三分之一的年龄≥50岁的患者存在认知谱障碍 65岁,超过一半的年龄≥ 85年。认知谱系障碍患者的预后比无认知谱系障碍的患者差:住院时间分别为25.0天和11.8天,30天死亡率分别为13.6%和9.0%,1年死亡率分别为40.0%和26.0%,1年死亡或再次入院率分别为62.4%和51.5%(均p < 0.01)。认知谱障碍类型差异相对较小;例如,在整个随访期间,任何认知谱障碍的存在都与死亡率增加有关,但根据认知谱障碍类型的不同,时间模式不同。认知谱系障碍患者的入院费用较高,但平均每日费用较低。局限性痴呆和/或谵妄的诊断缺乏和/或标准化是系统综述、定量研究和经济研究的局限性。经济研究仅限于住院费用,因为无法获得社会或非正规护理费用的数据。这项调查是在网上进行的,仅限于老年护理人员和认知谱系障碍患者。结论认知谱障碍在老年住院患者中很常见,与相当糟糕的医疗保健结果有关,个体认知谱障碍之间存在显著重叠。这表明,医疗保健系统需要系统地识别和开发患有认知谱系障碍的老年人的护理途径,避免只关注特定条件的途径。未来工作开发和评估用于医院认知谱系障碍患者管理的多领域干预措施。研究注册本研究注册为PROSPERO CRD42015024492。资助该项目由国家卫生研究所(NIHR)卫生服务和交付研究计划资助,并将在《卫生服务与交付研究》上全文发表;第9卷,第8期。有关更多项目信息,请访问NIHR期刊图书馆网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding health-care outcomes of older people with cognitive impairment and/or dementia admitted to hospital: a mixed-methods study
Background Cognitive impairment is common in older people admitted to hospital, but previous research has focused on single conditions. Objective This project sits in phase 0/1 of the Medical Research Council Framework for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions. It aims to develop an understanding of current health-care outcomes. This will be used in the future development of a multidomain intervention for people with confusion (dementia and cognitive impairment) in general hospitals. The research was conducted from January 2015 to June 2018 and used data from people admitted between 2012 and 2013. Design For the review of outcomes, the systematic review identified peer-reviewed quantitative epidemiology measuring prevalence and associations with outcomes. Screening for duplication and relevance was followed by full-text review, quality assessment and a narrative review (141 papers). A survey sought opinion on the key outcomes for people with dementia and/or confusion and their carers in the acute hospital (n = 78). For the analysis of outcomes including cost, the prospective cohort study was in a medical admissions unit in an acute hospital in one Scottish health board covering 10% of the Scottish population. The participants (n = 6724) were older people (aged ≥ 65 years) with or without a cognitive spectrum disorder who were admitted as medical emergencies between January 2012 and December 2013 and who underwent a structured nurse assessment. ‘Cognitive spectrum disorder’ was defined as any combination of delirium, known dementia or an Abbreviated Mental Test score of < 8 out of 10 points. The main outcome measures were living at home 30 days after discharge, mortality within 2 years of admission, length of stay, re-admission within 2 years of admission and cost. Data sources Scottish Morbidity Records 01 was linked to the Older Persons Routine Acute Assessment data set. Results In the systematic review, methodological heterogeneity, especially concerning diagnostic criteria, means that there is significant overlap in conditions of patients presenting to general hospitals with confusion. Patients and their families expect that patients are discharged in the same or a better condition than they were in on admission or, failing that, that they have a satisfactory experience of their admission. Cognitive spectrum disorders were present in more than one-third of patients aged ≥ 65 years, and in over half of those aged ≥ 85 years. Outcomes were worse in those patients with cognitive spectrum disorders than in those without: length of stay 25.0 vs. 11.8 days, 30-day mortality 13.6% vs. 9.0%, 1-year mortality 40.0% vs. 26.0%, 1-year mortality or re-admission 62.4% vs. 51.5%, respectively (all p < 0.01). There was relatively little difference by cognitive spectrum disorder type; for example, the presence of any cognitive spectrum disorder was associated with an increased mortality over the entire period of follow-up, but with different temporal patterns depending on the type of cognitive spectrum disorder. The cost of admission was higher for those with cognitive spectrum disorders, but the average daily cost was lower. Limitations A lack of diagnosis and/or standardisation of diagnosis for dementia and/or delirium was a limitation for the systematic review, the quantitative study and the economic study. The economic study was limited to in-hospital costs as data for social or informal care costs were unavailable. The survey was conducted online, limiting its reach to older carers and those people with cognitive spectrum disorders. Conclusions Cognitive spectrum disorders are common in older inpatients and are associated with considerably worse health-care outcomes, with significant overlap between individual cognitive spectrum disorders. This suggests the need for health-care systems to systematically identify and develop care pathways for older people with cognitive spectrum disorders, and avoid focusing on only condition-specific pathways. Future work Development and evaluation of a multidomain intervention for the management of patients with cognitive spectrum disorders in hospital. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015024492. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 8. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信