编辑器的声明

J. M. Honeycutt, K. Markman, A. D’Angiulli
{"title":"编辑器的声明","authors":"J. M. Honeycutt, K. Markman, A. D’Angiulli","doi":"10.1177/02762366221141206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Welcome to our spring issue for Volume 42, Issue 3. We have five innovative articles that examine topics dealing with role identity, imagery and physical activity, sex differences in facial body dissatisfaction, mindfulness and lucid dreaming, auditory imagery, and role identities. The initial study examines conventional and idiosyncratic role-identity meanings. The scholars leading this study are Michael Carter, Jazmin Hernandez, and Danielle Morales. This was a massive sample with over 930 respondents. They discuss the conventional role dimension based on societal socialization and an individual dimension that represents personal interpretation for role engagement. They examined how the balance of conventional and idiosyncratic role identity meaning contribute to selfidentity commitment. It is interesting how conventionality appears to have a greater effect on commitment to identities. The second study is by a team of six researchers: Sarah Deck, Brittany Semenchuk, Craig Hall, Lindsay Duncan, Sasha Kullman, and Shaelyn Strachan. They examine the effectiveness of physical activity imagery in conjunction with self and combined interventions on physical activity and associated outcomes. They begin their study by noting how an overwhelming majority of people in developed nations fail to meet the recommended guidelines for moderate physical activity during a week despite the increased risk of cardiovascular disease. They examined the effect of three interventions: imagery, possible selves, and combined, on exercise and self-efficacy, compared to a control group who were given nutritional information as an intervention. They had some interesting null results that are discussed in terms of health awareness. The third study examines the association between mindfulness, meditation, and lucid dreaming in a sample of over 220 participants. The authors are Chelsea Geise and Jonathan Smith. They discuss how lucid dreaming and mindfulness involve metaawareness (awareness of awareness) in which one is aware and consciously attends to present experiences. It is interesting how lucid dreaming was not associated with meditation practice or narrow-spectrum mindfulness experiences such as present-centered awareness and nonjudgmental acceptance while it was associated with dream recall and the experience of transcendence. The fourth study is by Timothy Hubbard and Susan Ruppel. They investigated the valence and verbalizations in terms of auditory imagery with subjective lateralization. Editorial","PeriodicalId":89150,"journal":{"name":"Imagination, cognition and personality","volume":"42 1","pages":"219 - 220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editor's Statement\",\"authors\":\"J. M. Honeycutt, K. Markman, A. D’Angiulli\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02762366221141206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Welcome to our spring issue for Volume 42, Issue 3. We have five innovative articles that examine topics dealing with role identity, imagery and physical activity, sex differences in facial body dissatisfaction, mindfulness and lucid dreaming, auditory imagery, and role identities. The initial study examines conventional and idiosyncratic role-identity meanings. The scholars leading this study are Michael Carter, Jazmin Hernandez, and Danielle Morales. This was a massive sample with over 930 respondents. They discuss the conventional role dimension based on societal socialization and an individual dimension that represents personal interpretation for role engagement. They examined how the balance of conventional and idiosyncratic role identity meaning contribute to selfidentity commitment. It is interesting how conventionality appears to have a greater effect on commitment to identities. The second study is by a team of six researchers: Sarah Deck, Brittany Semenchuk, Craig Hall, Lindsay Duncan, Sasha Kullman, and Shaelyn Strachan. They examine the effectiveness of physical activity imagery in conjunction with self and combined interventions on physical activity and associated outcomes. They begin their study by noting how an overwhelming majority of people in developed nations fail to meet the recommended guidelines for moderate physical activity during a week despite the increased risk of cardiovascular disease. They examined the effect of three interventions: imagery, possible selves, and combined, on exercise and self-efficacy, compared to a control group who were given nutritional information as an intervention. They had some interesting null results that are discussed in terms of health awareness. The third study examines the association between mindfulness, meditation, and lucid dreaming in a sample of over 220 participants. The authors are Chelsea Geise and Jonathan Smith. They discuss how lucid dreaming and mindfulness involve metaawareness (awareness of awareness) in which one is aware and consciously attends to present experiences. It is interesting how lucid dreaming was not associated with meditation practice or narrow-spectrum mindfulness experiences such as present-centered awareness and nonjudgmental acceptance while it was associated with dream recall and the experience of transcendence. The fourth study is by Timothy Hubbard and Susan Ruppel. They investigated the valence and verbalizations in terms of auditory imagery with subjective lateralization. Editorial\",\"PeriodicalId\":89150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Imagination, cognition and personality\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"219 - 220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Imagination, cognition and personality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02762366221141206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imagination, cognition and personality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02762366221141206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欢迎收看我们的春季版第42卷第3期。我们有五篇创新文章,探讨了角色认同、意象和身体活动、面部身体不满的性别差异、正念和清醒梦、听觉意象和角色认同等主题。最初的研究考察了传统和特殊的角色身份含义。领导这项研究的学者有迈克尔·卡特、贾兹明·埃尔南德斯和丹妮尔·莫拉莱斯。这是一个庞大的样本,有930多名受访者。他们讨论了基于社会社会化的传统角色维度和代表个人对角色参与的解释的个人维度。他们研究了传统和特殊角色身份意义的平衡如何促进自我身份承诺。有趣的是,传统性似乎对身份认同的承诺有更大的影响。第二项研究由六名研究人员组成:Sarah Deck、Brittany Semenchuk、Craig Hall、Lindsay Duncan、Sasha Kullman和Shaelyn Strachan。他们研究了身体活动意象与自我以及对身体活动和相关结果的联合干预的有效性。他们在研究开始时注意到,尽管患心血管疾病的风险增加,但发达国家的绝大多数人在一周内没有达到适度体育活动的建议指南。与接受营养信息作为干预的对照组相比,他们研究了三种干预措施对运动和自我效能的影响:意象、可能的自我和组合。他们得出了一些有趣的无效结果,这些结果在健康意识方面进行了讨论。第三项研究调查了220多名参与者的正念、冥想和清醒梦之间的联系。作者是Chelsea Geise和Jonathan Smith。他们讨论了清醒梦和正念如何涉及元意识(意识意识),在元意识中,一个人意识到并有意识地关注当前的体验。有趣的是,清醒梦与冥想练习或狭隘的正念体验(如以当下为中心的意识和非评判性的接受)无关,而与梦境回忆和超越体验有关。第四项研究由Timothy Hubbard和Susan Ruppel完成。他们研究了带有主观偏侧化的听觉意象的配价和动词化。社论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editor's Statement
Welcome to our spring issue for Volume 42, Issue 3. We have five innovative articles that examine topics dealing with role identity, imagery and physical activity, sex differences in facial body dissatisfaction, mindfulness and lucid dreaming, auditory imagery, and role identities. The initial study examines conventional and idiosyncratic role-identity meanings. The scholars leading this study are Michael Carter, Jazmin Hernandez, and Danielle Morales. This was a massive sample with over 930 respondents. They discuss the conventional role dimension based on societal socialization and an individual dimension that represents personal interpretation for role engagement. They examined how the balance of conventional and idiosyncratic role identity meaning contribute to selfidentity commitment. It is interesting how conventionality appears to have a greater effect on commitment to identities. The second study is by a team of six researchers: Sarah Deck, Brittany Semenchuk, Craig Hall, Lindsay Duncan, Sasha Kullman, and Shaelyn Strachan. They examine the effectiveness of physical activity imagery in conjunction with self and combined interventions on physical activity and associated outcomes. They begin their study by noting how an overwhelming majority of people in developed nations fail to meet the recommended guidelines for moderate physical activity during a week despite the increased risk of cardiovascular disease. They examined the effect of three interventions: imagery, possible selves, and combined, on exercise and self-efficacy, compared to a control group who were given nutritional information as an intervention. They had some interesting null results that are discussed in terms of health awareness. The third study examines the association between mindfulness, meditation, and lucid dreaming in a sample of over 220 participants. The authors are Chelsea Geise and Jonathan Smith. They discuss how lucid dreaming and mindfulness involve metaawareness (awareness of awareness) in which one is aware and consciously attends to present experiences. It is interesting how lucid dreaming was not associated with meditation practice or narrow-spectrum mindfulness experiences such as present-centered awareness and nonjudgmental acceptance while it was associated with dream recall and the experience of transcendence. The fourth study is by Timothy Hubbard and Susan Ruppel. They investigated the valence and verbalizations in terms of auditory imagery with subjective lateralization. Editorial
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信