过渡历史-南斯拉夫地区的情况

Q4 Social Sciences
Hajrudin Hromadzic
{"title":"过渡历史-南斯拉夫地区的情况","authors":"Hajrudin Hromadzic","doi":"10.17234/SOCEKOL.29.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyses the phenomenon of transition on several levels, with the main focus on the former Yugoslavian space. In the introduction, a brief overview of basic theses, interpretations and understandings of this phenomenon are given, both from the perspective of mainstream authors who belong to liberal and conservative traditions in political sciences and sociology, as well as the critics of “transitology” from the leftist, Marxist-oriented approaches. The paper then addresses the following questions: how to think of transition within the context of its own nature of time, its own temporality; as well as which method and tradition of thought would be adequate for analysing this kind of problem. Then, the paper confronts the practices of historization and the, so-called, culture of memory. The paper continues with the analysis of transition as ideology and transition as a term / concept – ideologeme. The central and longest part of the paper is devoted to the main case – the transition experience of (post)Yugoslav space.","PeriodicalId":35175,"journal":{"name":"Socijalna Ekologija","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17234/SOCEKOL.29.1.4","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Historizacija tranzicije – slučaj (post) jugoslavenskog prostora\",\"authors\":\"Hajrudin Hromadzic\",\"doi\":\"10.17234/SOCEKOL.29.1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper analyses the phenomenon of transition on several levels, with the main focus on the former Yugoslavian space. In the introduction, a brief overview of basic theses, interpretations and understandings of this phenomenon are given, both from the perspective of mainstream authors who belong to liberal and conservative traditions in political sciences and sociology, as well as the critics of “transitology” from the leftist, Marxist-oriented approaches. The paper then addresses the following questions: how to think of transition within the context of its own nature of time, its own temporality; as well as which method and tradition of thought would be adequate for analysing this kind of problem. Then, the paper confronts the practices of historization and the, so-called, culture of memory. The paper continues with the analysis of transition as ideology and transition as a term / concept – ideologeme. The central and longest part of the paper is devoted to the main case – the transition experience of (post)Yugoslav space.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socijalna Ekologija\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17234/SOCEKOL.29.1.4\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socijalna Ekologija\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17234/SOCEKOL.29.1.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socijalna Ekologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17234/SOCEKOL.29.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文从几个层面对转型现象进行了分析,并以前南斯拉夫为研究对象。在引言部分,简要概述了这一现象的基本论文、解释和理解,既从政治科学和社会学中属于自由主义和保守主义传统的主流作者的角度,也从左派的、以马克思主义为导向的方法对“过渡论”的批评。然后,本文讨论了以下问题:如何在其自身的时间性质,其自身的时间性的背景下思考过渡;以及哪种方法和思想传统适合于分析这类问题。然后,本文探讨了历史化的实践和所谓的记忆文化。本文继续分析了作为意识形态的转型和作为术语/概念的转型-意识形态主题。本文的中心和最长的部分致力于主要案例-(后)南斯拉夫空间的过渡经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Historizacija tranzicije – slučaj (post) jugoslavenskog prostora
The paper analyses the phenomenon of transition on several levels, with the main focus on the former Yugoslavian space. In the introduction, a brief overview of basic theses, interpretations and understandings of this phenomenon are given, both from the perspective of mainstream authors who belong to liberal and conservative traditions in political sciences and sociology, as well as the critics of “transitology” from the leftist, Marxist-oriented approaches. The paper then addresses the following questions: how to think of transition within the context of its own nature of time, its own temporality; as well as which method and tradition of thought would be adequate for analysing this kind of problem. Then, the paper confronts the practices of historization and the, so-called, culture of memory. The paper continues with the analysis of transition as ideology and transition as a term / concept – ideologeme. The central and longest part of the paper is devoted to the main case – the transition experience of (post)Yugoslav space.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Socijalna Ekologija
Socijalna Ekologija Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信