{"title":"《公司摩擦:公司法如何阻碍美国进步及应对之策》,作者:大卫·约西福","authors":"Cameron Teschuk","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"David Yosifon's first book, Corporate Friction: How Corporate Law Impedes American Progress and What To Do About It, provides a unique perspective on the corporate purpose debate. The corporate purpose debate can be summarized as a search for the answer to a seemingly rudimentary question: “For Whom is the Corporation Managed”? Yosifon presents a well-researched argument that U.S. corporations should be managed for the best interest of stakeholders, opposed to shareholders. This distinction is known as the shareholder-stakeholder best-interest trade-of. Yosifon supports his argument with a refned analysis of the assumptions and norms that have led to a shareholder-centric model of corporate governance in the United States and its impact on “American progress.” This book review is available in Osgoode Hall Law Journal: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol58/ iss1/8","PeriodicalId":45757,"journal":{"name":"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate Friction: How Corporate Law Impedes American Progress and What To Do About It by David Yosifon\",\"authors\":\"Cameron Teschuk\",\"doi\":\"10.60082/2817-5069.3638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"David Yosifon's first book, Corporate Friction: How Corporate Law Impedes American Progress and What To Do About It, provides a unique perspective on the corporate purpose debate. The corporate purpose debate can be summarized as a search for the answer to a seemingly rudimentary question: “For Whom is the Corporation Managed”? Yosifon presents a well-researched argument that U.S. corporations should be managed for the best interest of stakeholders, opposed to shareholders. This distinction is known as the shareholder-stakeholder best-interest trade-of. Yosifon supports his argument with a refned analysis of the assumptions and norms that have led to a shareholder-centric model of corporate governance in the United States and its impact on “American progress.” This book review is available in Osgoode Hall Law Journal: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol58/ iss1/8\",\"PeriodicalId\":45757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.3638\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.3638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
David Yosifon的第一本书《公司摩擦:公司法如何推动美国进步以及如何应对》对公司宗旨辩论提供了独特的视角。公司宗旨的争论可以概括为对一个看似基本的问题的答案的探索:“公司是为谁管理的”?Yosifon提出了一个经过充分研究的论点,即美国公司的管理应该符合利益相关者的最大利益,而不是股东的最大利益。这种区别被称为股东利益相关者的最佳利益交易。Yosifon通过对导致美国以股东为中心的公司治理模式及其对“美国进步”的影响的假设和规范的重新分析来支持他的论点https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol58/iss1/8
Corporate Friction: How Corporate Law Impedes American Progress and What To Do About It by David Yosifon
David Yosifon's first book, Corporate Friction: How Corporate Law Impedes American Progress and What To Do About It, provides a unique perspective on the corporate purpose debate. The corporate purpose debate can be summarized as a search for the answer to a seemingly rudimentary question: “For Whom is the Corporation Managed”? Yosifon presents a well-researched argument that U.S. corporations should be managed for the best interest of stakeholders, opposed to shareholders. This distinction is known as the shareholder-stakeholder best-interest trade-of. Yosifon supports his argument with a refned analysis of the assumptions and norms that have led to a shareholder-centric model of corporate governance in the United States and its impact on “American progress.” This book review is available in Osgoode Hall Law Journal: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol58/ iss1/8