从资源基础的角度看欧洲学术人才在中国的地位

Q3 Social Sciences
M. Mouritzen
{"title":"从资源基础的角度看欧洲学术人才在中国的地位","authors":"M. Mouritzen","doi":"10.1177/2212585X221139484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores global talent flows in a Chinese context before and immediately after the introduction of Covid-19 measures by focusing on European researchers’ migration experiences as liminal experiences betwixt and between space, institutions, and countries. These experiences are part of a broader understanding of global talent flows in a period where the Chinese economy is transforming from production-based to knowledge-based but simultaneously challenged by a global pandemic. Working with a mixed dataset that includes both semi-structured interviews and survey data, the paper finds that European researchers are under the impression that they are considered a valuable resource by their host institution. The paper explores the value of European researchers in China through the resource-based view and connects it to their ability to connect their Chinese institutions internationally and introduce new publication possibilities. However, by combining bridge decay with liminality, this paper also concludes that the liminal position that European researchers find themselves within is also a significant risk as some of the elements that make them valuable might be challenged by periods of crisis. Finally, China offers an extreme case as a rising science nation that is important to study continuously but even more so during a crisis.","PeriodicalId":37881,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European academic talents liminal position in China from the resource-based view\",\"authors\":\"M. Mouritzen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2212585X221139484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores global talent flows in a Chinese context before and immediately after the introduction of Covid-19 measures by focusing on European researchers’ migration experiences as liminal experiences betwixt and between space, institutions, and countries. These experiences are part of a broader understanding of global talent flows in a period where the Chinese economy is transforming from production-based to knowledge-based but simultaneously challenged by a global pandemic. Working with a mixed dataset that includes both semi-structured interviews and survey data, the paper finds that European researchers are under the impression that they are considered a valuable resource by their host institution. The paper explores the value of European researchers in China through the resource-based view and connects it to their ability to connect their Chinese institutions internationally and introduce new publication possibilities. However, by combining bridge decay with liminality, this paper also concludes that the liminal position that European researchers find themselves within is also a significant risk as some of the elements that make them valuable might be challenged by periods of crisis. Finally, China offers an extreme case as a rising science nation that is important to study continuously but even more so during a crisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Chinese Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Chinese Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2212585X221139484\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chinese Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2212585X221139484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文通过关注欧洲研究人员在空间、机构和国家之间的迁移经历,探讨了在中国引入新冠肺炎措施之前和之后的全球人才流动。这些经历是对全球人才流动的更广泛理解的一部分,目前中国经济正在从生产型向知识型转变,但同时也受到全球流行病的挑战。研究了一个混合数据集,其中包括半结构化访谈和调查数据,该论文发现,欧洲研究人员的印象是,他们被东道国机构认为是一种有价值的资源。本文通过资源基础观点探讨了在华欧洲研究人员的价值,并将其与他们在国际上联系中国机构和引入新的出版可能性的能力联系起来。然而,通过结合桥梁衰减和阈限性,本文还得出结论,欧洲研究人员发现自己所处的阈限地位也是一个重大风险,因为使他们有价值的一些因素可能会受到危机时期的挑战。最后,中国提供了一个极端的例子,作为一个正在崛起的科学国家,持续学习很重要,在危机期间更是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
European academic talents liminal position in China from the resource-based view
This article explores global talent flows in a Chinese context before and immediately after the introduction of Covid-19 measures by focusing on European researchers’ migration experiences as liminal experiences betwixt and between space, institutions, and countries. These experiences are part of a broader understanding of global talent flows in a period where the Chinese economy is transforming from production-based to knowledge-based but simultaneously challenged by a global pandemic. Working with a mixed dataset that includes both semi-structured interviews and survey data, the paper finds that European researchers are under the impression that they are considered a valuable resource by their host institution. The paper explores the value of European researchers in China through the resource-based view and connects it to their ability to connect their Chinese institutions internationally and introduce new publication possibilities. However, by combining bridge decay with liminality, this paper also concludes that the liminal position that European researchers find themselves within is also a significant risk as some of the elements that make them valuable might be challenged by periods of crisis. Finally, China offers an extreme case as a rising science nation that is important to study continuously but even more so during a crisis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Chinese Education
International Journal of Chinese Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Chinese Education (IJCE) is a result of the collaboration between Brill Academic Publishers and the Institute of Education at Tsinghua University. It aims to strengthen Chinese academic exchanges and cooperation with other countries in order to improve Chinese educational research and promote Chinese educational development. Through collaboration among scholars in and outside of China who are dedicated to the investigation of Chinese education, this journal aims to raise Chinese educational research levels, further recognize and solve Chinese educational problems, inform Chinese educational policies and decisions, and promote Chinese educational reform and development. This journal welcomes empirical as well as theoretical studies on particular educational issues and/or policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信