注意缺陷/多动障碍（ADHD）在流行病学研究中的有效性和可靠性：基于偏最小二乘的验证性因素分析

Journal of Injury and Violence Research Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI:10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1428

Shila Hasanzadeh, M. Asghari jafarabadi, Homyoun Sadeghi-Bazargani

{"title":"注意缺陷/多动障碍（ADHD）在流行病学研究中的有效性和可靠性：基于偏最小二乘的验证性因素分析","authors":"Shila Hasanzadeh, M. Asghari jafarabadi, Homyoun Sadeghi-Bazargani","doi":"10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Background: Despite many types of research about tools of ADHD have been done over the past decade, lack of a Valid and Reliable tool is observed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of ADHD questionnaire in epidemiological studies based on confirmatory factor analysis (PLS). Methods: The present study is a case-control study that was conducted on 456 male motorcyclists and research tool was ADHD questionnaire in 2013. A total of 30 items from experts and audience community were detected necessary. Content validity was verified using expert opinion and construct validity was verified by factor analysis. The results of the Partial Least Squares -based confirmatory factor analysis was done by SMARTPLS3 software. The Cv-communality index, whose positive values indicate the quality of the model and the Cv-redundancy was calculated. Results: According to expert’s opinion, content validity was confirmed. Model fit indicators (AVE> 0.5, SRMR= 0.08, NFI= 0.89) the adequacy of the model and the result structural validity Confirmed. Also, there was also a significant relationship between sub-scales and items. There was a direct, positive and significant relationship between the subscale ASS, CSS and DSS with ADHD. Cronbach s alpha (> 0.7) and combined reliability (> 0.7) confirmed the reliability of the questionnaire. Conclusions: The results showed the validity and reliability of the ADHD questionnaire in epidemiologic studies and various studies for review and generalizability suggested in other communities. Keywords: ADHD, CFA, Reliability and Validity, Traffic","PeriodicalId":32422,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Injury and Violence Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and Reliability of the Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in Epidemiological Studies: partial least squares-based confirmatory factor analysis\",\"authors\":\"Shila Hasanzadeh, M. Asghari jafarabadi, Homyoun Sadeghi-Bazargani\",\"doi\":\"10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Background: Despite many types of research about tools of ADHD have been done over the past decade, lack of a Valid and Reliable tool is observed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of ADHD questionnaire in epidemiological studies based on confirmatory factor analysis (PLS). Methods: The present study is a case-control study that was conducted on 456 male motorcyclists and research tool was ADHD questionnaire in 2013. A total of 30 items from experts and audience community were detected necessary. Content validity was verified using expert opinion and construct validity was verified by factor analysis. The results of the Partial Least Squares -based confirmatory factor analysis was done by SMARTPLS3 software. The Cv-communality index, whose positive values indicate the quality of the model and the Cv-redundancy was calculated. Results: According to expert’s opinion, content validity was confirmed. Model fit indicators (AVE> 0.5, SRMR= 0.08, NFI= 0.89) the adequacy of the model and the result structural validity Confirmed. Also, there was also a significant relationship between sub-scales and items. There was a direct, positive and significant relationship between the subscale ASS, CSS and DSS with ADHD. Cronbach s alpha (> 0.7) and combined reliability (> 0.7) confirmed the reliability of the questionnaire. Conclusions: The results showed the validity and reliability of the ADHD questionnaire in epidemiologic studies and various studies for review and generalizability suggested in other communities. Keywords: ADHD, CFA, Reliability and Validity, Traffic\",\"PeriodicalId\":32422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Injury and Violence Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Injury and Violence Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1428\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Injury and Violence Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:背景:在过去的十年中，尽管对ADHD工具进行了多种类型的研究，但缺乏一种有效可靠的工具。本研究的目的是探讨ADHD问卷在流行病学研究中的效度和信度。方法:采用2013年对456名男性摩托车手进行病例对照研究，研究工具为ADHD问卷。专家和观众团体提出的30个项目被认为是必要的。内容效度采用专家意见验证，结构效度采用因子分析验证。基于偏最小二乘法的验证性因子分析结果由SMARTPLS3软件完成。计算Cv-communality指数，其正值表示模型的质量和cv -冗余度。结果:根据专家意见，确认了内容效度。模型拟合指标(AVE> 0.5, SRMR= 0.08, NFI= 0.89)证实了模型的充分性和结果的结构效度。此外，子量表与项目之间也存在显著的相关关系。量表中ASS、CSS和DSS与ADHD存在直接、显著的正相关。Cronbach alpha(> 0.7)和联合信度(> 0.7)证实了问卷的信度。结论:调查结果显示ADHD问卷在流行病学研究和各种研究中的有效性和可靠性，建议在其他社区进行回顾和推广。关键词:ADHD, CFA，信效度，流量

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Validity and Reliability of the Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in Epidemiological Studies: partial least squares-based confirmatory factor analysis

Abstract: Background: Despite many types of research about tools of ADHD have been done over the past decade, lack of a Valid and Reliable tool is observed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of ADHD questionnaire in epidemiological studies based on confirmatory factor analysis (PLS). Methods: The present study is a case-control study that was conducted on 456 male motorcyclists and research tool was ADHD questionnaire in 2013. A total of 30 items from experts and audience community were detected necessary. Content validity was verified using expert opinion and construct validity was verified by factor analysis. The results of the Partial Least Squares -based confirmatory factor analysis was done by SMARTPLS3 software. The Cv-communality index, whose positive values indicate the quality of the model and the Cv-redundancy was calculated. Results: According to expert’s opinion, content validity was confirmed. Model fit indicators (AVE> 0.5, SRMR= 0.08, NFI= 0.89) the adequacy of the model and the result structural validity Confirmed. Also, there was also a significant relationship between sub-scales and items. There was a direct, positive and significant relationship between the subscale ASS, CSS and DSS with ADHD. Cronbach s alpha (> 0.7) and combined reliability (> 0.7) confirmed the reliability of the questionnaire. Conclusions: The results showed the validity and reliability of the ADHD questionnaire in epidemiologic studies and various studies for review and generalizability suggested in other communities. Keywords: ADHD, CFA, Reliability and Validity, Traffic

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Injury and Violence Research

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Injury and Violence Research (JIVR) is a peer-reviewed open-access medical journal covering all aspects of traumatology includes quantitative and qualitative studies in the field of clinical and basic sciences about trauma, burns, drowning, falls, occupational/road/ sport safety, youth violence, child/elder abuse, child/elder injuries, intimate partner abuse/sexual violence, self-harm, suicide, patient safety, safe communities, consumer safety, disaster management, terrorism, surveillance/burden of injury and all other intentional and unintentional injuries.