{"title":"怪异的他人:非洲未来主义青年文学中的黑人女孩拒绝","authors":"S. Toliver, Kamala D. Harris, Mike Pence","doi":"10.1080/00497878.2023.2230509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following a debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former Vice President Mike Pence, then President Donald Trump appeared on Fox News to give his reaction statement: “This monster that was onstage with Mike Pence, who destroyed her last night, by the way, but this monster . . . I thought that wasn’t even a contest last night. She was terrible. I don’t think you could get worse . . . And totally unlikable” (Summers, par. 2). Although the use of these descriptors are negative in their own right, Summers also noted that Trump “previously reserved the term ‘monster’ for terrorists, murder[ers] and major natural disasters” (par. 1). In this way, Trump attempted to dehumanize and diminish Vice President Harris, a strategy historically based in the continuous global stereotype of Black women and girls as monstrous Other. According to Muhammad and McArthur, the ‘“double jeopardy’ of being both Black and female in society has continued to create and reinforce a U.S. culture satiated with derogatory representations of Black women and girls” (134). These representations include stereotypes like the Mammy, a desexualized woman so loyal to whiteness that she cares more for her masters than she does for herself and her family; the Sapphire, a loud, rude, malicious, overbearing, and angry woman; and the Jezebel, a hypersexual, innately promiscuous, and sexually deviant woman (Harris 4–6; West 288). Each of these stereotypes positions Black women and girls as Other, a being who is “a threat and a danger” (de Beauvior 88) to those in dominant society. Although the above stereotypes are often associated with Black women, they also influence the lives of Black girls. In fact, numerous scholars have argued that society’s perception of Black girls is distorted by clichéd depictions that create harmful restrictions on and blatant misrepresentations of Black girls’ identities (Muhammad and Haddix 301; Sealey-Ruiz 291; Toliver, “Breaking Binaries” 6). In a survey study of 325 adults from various racial and ethnic backgrounds, Epstein and colleagues found that, compared to white girls of the same age, Black girls are inaccurately described as knowing more about adult topics and sex and therefore need less nurturing,","PeriodicalId":45212,"journal":{"name":"WOMENS STUDIES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL","volume":"52 1","pages":"708 - 723"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monstrous Others: Black Girl Refusal in Afrofuturist Young Adult Literature\",\"authors\":\"S. Toliver, Kamala D. Harris, Mike Pence\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00497878.2023.2230509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following a debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former Vice President Mike Pence, then President Donald Trump appeared on Fox News to give his reaction statement: “This monster that was onstage with Mike Pence, who destroyed her last night, by the way, but this monster . . . I thought that wasn’t even a contest last night. She was terrible. I don’t think you could get worse . . . And totally unlikable” (Summers, par. 2). Although the use of these descriptors are negative in their own right, Summers also noted that Trump “previously reserved the term ‘monster’ for terrorists, murder[ers] and major natural disasters” (par. 1). In this way, Trump attempted to dehumanize and diminish Vice President Harris, a strategy historically based in the continuous global stereotype of Black women and girls as monstrous Other. According to Muhammad and McArthur, the ‘“double jeopardy’ of being both Black and female in society has continued to create and reinforce a U.S. culture satiated with derogatory representations of Black women and girls” (134). These representations include stereotypes like the Mammy, a desexualized woman so loyal to whiteness that she cares more for her masters than she does for herself and her family; the Sapphire, a loud, rude, malicious, overbearing, and angry woman; and the Jezebel, a hypersexual, innately promiscuous, and sexually deviant woman (Harris 4–6; West 288). Each of these stereotypes positions Black women and girls as Other, a being who is “a threat and a danger” (de Beauvior 88) to those in dominant society. Although the above stereotypes are often associated with Black women, they also influence the lives of Black girls. In fact, numerous scholars have argued that society’s perception of Black girls is distorted by clichéd depictions that create harmful restrictions on and blatant misrepresentations of Black girls’ identities (Muhammad and Haddix 301; Sealey-Ruiz 291; Toliver, “Breaking Binaries” 6). In a survey study of 325 adults from various racial and ethnic backgrounds, Epstein and colleagues found that, compared to white girls of the same age, Black girls are inaccurately described as knowing more about adult topics and sex and therefore need less nurturing,\",\"PeriodicalId\":45212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WOMENS STUDIES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"708 - 723\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2023.2230509\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WOMENS STUDIES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2023.2230509","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯和前副总统迈克·彭斯之间的辩论之后,当时的总统唐纳德·特朗普出现在福克斯新闻上,发表了他的回应声明:“顺便说一下,这个怪物和迈克·彭斯在台上,他昨晚摧毁了她,但是这个怪物……我还以为昨晚根本算不上比赛呢。她太可怕了。我不认为你会变得更糟…完全不讨人喜欢”(萨默斯,第2页)。虽然使用这些描述词本身就是负面的,但萨默斯还指出,特朗普“以前把‘怪物’这个词保留给恐怖分子、杀人犯和重大自然灾害”(第1页)。通过这种方式,特朗普试图使副总统哈里斯失去人性,贬低他,这种策略在历史上是基于全球对黑人妇女和女孩的持续刻板印象,即他们是怪物。根据默罕默德和麦克阿瑟的说法,黑人和女性在社会上的“双重危险”继续创造和强化了一种美国文化,这种文化对黑人妇女和女孩的贬损表现感到满意。这些形象包括一些刻板印象,比如嬷嬷,一个没有性欲的女人,对白人如此忠诚,她关心她的主人胜过关心她自己和她的家庭;蓝宝石是一个吵闹、粗鲁、恶毒、傲慢、愤怒的女人;还有耶洗别,一个性欲亢进、天生滥交、性变态的女人(哈里斯4-6;西288)。这些刻板印象中的每一种都将黑人妇女和女孩定位为“他者”,对主导社会的人来说是“威胁和危险”(de Beauvior 88)。虽然上述刻板印象通常与黑人妇女联系在一起,但它们也影响着黑人女孩的生活。事实上,许多学者认为,社会对黑人女孩的看法被陈腐的描述扭曲了,这些描述对黑人女孩的身份造成了有害的限制和公然的歪曲(Muhammad and Haddix 301;Sealey-Ruiz 291;在对325名不同种族和民族背景的成年人进行的一项调查研究中,爱泼斯坦及其同事发现,与同龄的白人女孩相比,黑人女孩被错误地描述为更了解成人话题和性,因此需要更少的培养。
Monstrous Others: Black Girl Refusal in Afrofuturist Young Adult Literature
Following a debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former Vice President Mike Pence, then President Donald Trump appeared on Fox News to give his reaction statement: “This monster that was onstage with Mike Pence, who destroyed her last night, by the way, but this monster . . . I thought that wasn’t even a contest last night. She was terrible. I don’t think you could get worse . . . And totally unlikable” (Summers, par. 2). Although the use of these descriptors are negative in their own right, Summers also noted that Trump “previously reserved the term ‘monster’ for terrorists, murder[ers] and major natural disasters” (par. 1). In this way, Trump attempted to dehumanize and diminish Vice President Harris, a strategy historically based in the continuous global stereotype of Black women and girls as monstrous Other. According to Muhammad and McArthur, the ‘“double jeopardy’ of being both Black and female in society has continued to create and reinforce a U.S. culture satiated with derogatory representations of Black women and girls” (134). These representations include stereotypes like the Mammy, a desexualized woman so loyal to whiteness that she cares more for her masters than she does for herself and her family; the Sapphire, a loud, rude, malicious, overbearing, and angry woman; and the Jezebel, a hypersexual, innately promiscuous, and sexually deviant woman (Harris 4–6; West 288). Each of these stereotypes positions Black women and girls as Other, a being who is “a threat and a danger” (de Beauvior 88) to those in dominant society. Although the above stereotypes are often associated with Black women, they also influence the lives of Black girls. In fact, numerous scholars have argued that society’s perception of Black girls is distorted by clichéd depictions that create harmful restrictions on and blatant misrepresentations of Black girls’ identities (Muhammad and Haddix 301; Sealey-Ruiz 291; Toliver, “Breaking Binaries” 6). In a survey study of 325 adults from various racial and ethnic backgrounds, Epstein and colleagues found that, compared to white girls of the same age, Black girls are inaccurately described as knowing more about adult topics and sex and therefore need less nurturing,