形成性评价与数学教育:在职数学教师的视角

Q3 Multidisciplinary
Alejandra Balbi, Micaela Bonilla, María Alejandra Otamendi, Karina Curione, Pablo Beltrán-Pellicer
{"title":"形成性评价与数学教育:在职数学教师的视角","authors":"Alejandra Balbi, Micaela Bonilla, María Alejandra Otamendi, Karina Curione, Pablo Beltrán-Pellicer","doi":"10.17648/acta.scientiae.7043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Although there is consensus on the favourable impact of formative assessment (FA) on learning, it is unclear to what extent general FA strategies are directly applicable to the specific field of mathematics education. Objective: Study the relevance of a questionnaire which describes 26 FA practices supported by Wiliam’s model in the particular context of mathematics education. Design: Mixed, the frequency and feasibility are consulted through a questionnaire and in-depth interviews. Participants : Thirty in-service mathematics teachers answered the survey and of ten invited, three agreed to be interviewed. Data analysis : We carried out a descriptive analysis for quantitative data and qualitative thematic analysis. Results : The strategies of collecting evidence, feedback, collaboration, and self-regulated involvement in learning are viable and frequent in mathematics education, however, the strategy of clarifying and sharing goals requires adaptation to the context. In addition, nine novel FA practices are described. The implementation of formative assessment creates tensions with the summative function, it is laborious to implement and consequently takes time outside the classroom. Conclusion : We identified that FA practices are frequent and feasible to implement. Clarifying and sharing goals requires the adequacy of the mathematical context.","PeriodicalId":36967,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formative Assessment and Mathematics Education: the Perspective of In-Service Mathematics Teachers\",\"authors\":\"Alejandra Balbi, Micaela Bonilla, María Alejandra Otamendi, Karina Curione, Pablo Beltrán-Pellicer\",\"doi\":\"10.17648/acta.scientiae.7043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Although there is consensus on the favourable impact of formative assessment (FA) on learning, it is unclear to what extent general FA strategies are directly applicable to the specific field of mathematics education. Objective: Study the relevance of a questionnaire which describes 26 FA practices supported by Wiliam’s model in the particular context of mathematics education. Design: Mixed, the frequency and feasibility are consulted through a questionnaire and in-depth interviews. Participants : Thirty in-service mathematics teachers answered the survey and of ten invited, three agreed to be interviewed. Data analysis : We carried out a descriptive analysis for quantitative data and qualitative thematic analysis. Results : The strategies of collecting evidence, feedback, collaboration, and self-regulated involvement in learning are viable and frequent in mathematics education, however, the strategy of clarifying and sharing goals requires adaptation to the context. In addition, nine novel FA practices are described. The implementation of formative assessment creates tensions with the summative function, it is laborious to implement and consequently takes time outside the classroom. Conclusion : We identified that FA practices are frequent and feasible to implement. Clarifying and sharing goals requires the adequacy of the mathematical context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Scientiae\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Scientiae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管形成性评估(FA)对学习的有利影响达成了共识,但尚不清楚一般的FA策略在多大程度上直接适用于数学教育的特定领域。目的:研究Wiliam模型支持的26种FA实践问卷在数学教育特定背景下的相关性。设计:混合,通过问卷调查和深入访谈来咨询频率和可行性。参与者:30名在职数学教师回答了调查,在10名受邀教师中,3人同意接受采访。数据分析:我们对定量数据和定性主题分析进行了描述性分析。结果:收集证据、反馈、合作和自主参与学习的策略在数学教育中是可行的,而且经常使用,然而,澄清和共享目标的策略需要适应环境。此外,还介绍了九种新颖的FA实践。形成性评估的实施与总结性功能产生了紧张关系,实施起来很费力,因此需要在课堂之外花费时间。结论:我们发现FA实践是频繁的,并且实施起来是可行的。明确和共享目标需要数学背景的充分性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formative Assessment and Mathematics Education: the Perspective of In-Service Mathematics Teachers
Background: Although there is consensus on the favourable impact of formative assessment (FA) on learning, it is unclear to what extent general FA strategies are directly applicable to the specific field of mathematics education. Objective: Study the relevance of a questionnaire which describes 26 FA practices supported by Wiliam’s model in the particular context of mathematics education. Design: Mixed, the frequency and feasibility are consulted through a questionnaire and in-depth interviews. Participants : Thirty in-service mathematics teachers answered the survey and of ten invited, three agreed to be interviewed. Data analysis : We carried out a descriptive analysis for quantitative data and qualitative thematic analysis. Results : The strategies of collecting evidence, feedback, collaboration, and self-regulated involvement in learning are viable and frequent in mathematics education, however, the strategy of clarifying and sharing goals requires adaptation to the context. In addition, nine novel FA practices are described. The implementation of formative assessment creates tensions with the summative function, it is laborious to implement and consequently takes time outside the classroom. Conclusion : We identified that FA practices are frequent and feasible to implement. Clarifying and sharing goals requires the adequacy of the mathematical context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Scientiae
Acta Scientiae Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信