军事人群中道德伤害和创伤后应激障碍概念界限的界定:系统回顾

Q2 Arts and Humanities
L. Zasiekina, O. Kokun, Iryna Hlova, Martha J. Bojko
{"title":"军事人群中道德伤害和创伤后应激障碍概念界限的界定:系统回顾","authors":"L. Zasiekina, O. Kokun, Iryna Hlova, Martha J. Bojko","doi":"10.29038/eejpl.2023.10.1.zas","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nMoral injury (MI) is one of the main emotional distress in military personnel. Findings suggest that in wartime there are an endless number of potentially morally injurious events, which determine maladaptive cognitions, moral emotions of guilt and shame, and inefficient behaviour. Notwithstanding the strong association between MI and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) recognized in the number of studies, there is still a gap of accurate data aligned with identifying the differences between MI and PTSD in terms of treatment and healing. This study aims to establish conceptual boundaries of moral injury, post-traumatic stress disorder and systematically review the empirical literature on them in military personnel. Specifically, we explored and summarized co-occurrence of MI and PTSD in military personnel and evaluated the association between MI and PTSD, as well with other emotional distress. The results indicate that the key aspects of comparison of MI and PTSD include definition and symptomology, measurement, neural underpinning, and treatment. Considering the consequences of poor social well-being, emotional sufferings and inefficient behavioral patterns, treatments focusing on MI separately from PTSD-focused models are much needed. \n\n\nAcknowledgements\nThis study is a part of the Moral Injury and Healing of Combatants: Neuropsychological Correlates and Psychological Interventions project funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (2022-2023).\nDisclosure statement\nNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.\n","PeriodicalId":36553,"journal":{"name":"East European Journal of Psycholinguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining conceptual boundaries of moral injury and post-traumatic stress disorder in military population: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"L. Zasiekina, O. Kokun, Iryna Hlova, Martha J. Bojko\",\"doi\":\"10.29038/eejpl.2023.10.1.zas\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nMoral injury (MI) is one of the main emotional distress in military personnel. Findings suggest that in wartime there are an endless number of potentially morally injurious events, which determine maladaptive cognitions, moral emotions of guilt and shame, and inefficient behaviour. Notwithstanding the strong association between MI and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) recognized in the number of studies, there is still a gap of accurate data aligned with identifying the differences between MI and PTSD in terms of treatment and healing. This study aims to establish conceptual boundaries of moral injury, post-traumatic stress disorder and systematically review the empirical literature on them in military personnel. Specifically, we explored and summarized co-occurrence of MI and PTSD in military personnel and evaluated the association between MI and PTSD, as well with other emotional distress. The results indicate that the key aspects of comparison of MI and PTSD include definition and symptomology, measurement, neural underpinning, and treatment. Considering the consequences of poor social well-being, emotional sufferings and inefficient behavioral patterns, treatments focusing on MI separately from PTSD-focused models are much needed. \\n\\n\\nAcknowledgements\\nThis study is a part of the Moral Injury and Healing of Combatants: Neuropsychological Correlates and Psychological Interventions project funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (2022-2023).\\nDisclosure statement\\nNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":36553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East European Journal of Psycholinguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East European Journal of Psycholinguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2023.10.1.zas\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Journal of Psycholinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2023.10.1.zas","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

道德伤害是军人的主要情感困扰之一。研究结果表明,在战争期间,有无数潜在的道德伤害事件,这些事件决定了不适应的认知、内疚和羞耻的道德情绪以及低效行为。尽管在许多研究中认识到MI和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)之间有着密切的联系,但在确定MI和PTSD在治疗和治愈方面的差异方面,仍然存在准确数据的差距。本研究旨在建立道德伤害、创伤后应激障碍的概念边界,并系统地回顾军事人员中关于道德伤害、心理创伤后应激症的实证文献。具体而言,我们探索并总结了军事人员中MI和PTSD的共同发生,并评估了MI和PTSD以及其他情绪困扰之间的关系。结果表明,MI和PTSD比较的关键方面包括定义和症状、测量、神经基础和治疗。考虑到不良的社会幸福感、情绪痛苦和低效的行为模式的后果,非常需要将MI与PTSD模型分开进行治疗。鸣谢本研究是乌克兰教育和科学部资助的“战斗人员的道德伤害和治疗:神经心理学相关性和心理干预”项目(2022-2023)的一部分。披露声明作者没有报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Defining conceptual boundaries of moral injury and post-traumatic stress disorder in military population: A systematic review
Moral injury (MI) is one of the main emotional distress in military personnel. Findings suggest that in wartime there are an endless number of potentially morally injurious events, which determine maladaptive cognitions, moral emotions of guilt and shame, and inefficient behaviour. Notwithstanding the strong association between MI and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) recognized in the number of studies, there is still a gap of accurate data aligned with identifying the differences between MI and PTSD in terms of treatment and healing. This study aims to establish conceptual boundaries of moral injury, post-traumatic stress disorder and systematically review the empirical literature on them in military personnel. Specifically, we explored and summarized co-occurrence of MI and PTSD in military personnel and evaluated the association between MI and PTSD, as well with other emotional distress. The results indicate that the key aspects of comparison of MI and PTSD include definition and symptomology, measurement, neural underpinning, and treatment. Considering the consequences of poor social well-being, emotional sufferings and inefficient behavioral patterns, treatments focusing on MI separately from PTSD-focused models are much needed. Acknowledgements This study is a part of the Moral Injury and Healing of Combatants: Neuropsychological Correlates and Psychological Interventions project funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (2022-2023). Disclosure statement No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
East European Journal of Psycholinguistics
East European Journal of Psycholinguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信