内部威胁和个体差异:有意和无意动机

Jordan Richard Schoenherr
{"title":"内部威胁和个体差异:有意和无意动机","authors":"Jordan Richard Schoenherr","doi":"10.1109/TTS.2022.3192767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study extends a cybersecurity questionnaire (CSEC) by including items that differentiate cyber hygiene behavior, self-disclosure vulnerability, intrusion vulnerability, and persuasion vulnerability. Using individual difference measures that are related to performance in experimental tasks, the present study provides evidence that individuals high in emotionality (i.e., fear and anxiety) and low in moral motivations (i.e., fairness and morality) are more likely to report engaging in behaviors related to unintentional insider threats. Consequently, this study provides further evidence that CSEC+ can be used to assess critical cybersecurity practices from the perspective of insiders.","PeriodicalId":73324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","volume":"3 3","pages":"175-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insider Threats and Individual Differences: Intention and Unintentional Motivations\",\"authors\":\"Jordan Richard Schoenherr\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TTS.2022.3192767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study extends a cybersecurity questionnaire (CSEC) by including items that differentiate cyber hygiene behavior, self-disclosure vulnerability, intrusion vulnerability, and persuasion vulnerability. Using individual difference measures that are related to performance in experimental tasks, the present study provides evidence that individuals high in emotionality (i.e., fear and anxiety) and low in moral motivations (i.e., fairness and morality) are more likely to report engaging in behaviors related to unintentional insider threats. Consequently, this study provides further evidence that CSEC+ can be used to assess critical cybersecurity practices from the perspective of insiders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE transactions on technology and society\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"175-184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE transactions on technology and society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9839296/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9839296/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究扩展了网络安全问卷(CSEC),包括区分网络卫生行为、自我披露漏洞、入侵漏洞和说服漏洞的项目。使用与实验任务表现相关的个体差异测量,本研究提供了证据,表明情绪性(即恐惧和焦虑)高、道德动机(即公平和道德)低的个体更有可能报告参与与无意内部威胁有关的行为。因此,本研究提供了进一步的证据,证明CSEC+可以用于从内部人士的角度评估关键的网络安全实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insider Threats and Individual Differences: Intention and Unintentional Motivations
The present study extends a cybersecurity questionnaire (CSEC) by including items that differentiate cyber hygiene behavior, self-disclosure vulnerability, intrusion vulnerability, and persuasion vulnerability. Using individual difference measures that are related to performance in experimental tasks, the present study provides evidence that individuals high in emotionality (i.e., fear and anxiety) and low in moral motivations (i.e., fairness and morality) are more likely to report engaging in behaviors related to unintentional insider threats. Consequently, this study provides further evidence that CSEC+ can be used to assess critical cybersecurity practices from the perspective of insiders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信