{"title":"曲线背后:全球大气电路卡内基曲线的历史来源比较","authors":"R. Harrison","doi":"10.5194/hgss-11-207-2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The “Carnegie curve” describes the diurnal variation of the global\natmospheric electric circuit. It was originally found from atmospheric\nelectric potential gradient (PG) measurements made on the Carnegie, effectively a\nfloating atmospheric electrical observatory, which undertook global cruises\nbetween 1915 and 1929. These measurements confirmed that the single diurnal\ncycle PG variation, previously obtained in both polar regions, was global in\nextent. The averaged diurnal PG variation, represented by derived harmonic\nfits, provides a characteristic variation known as the “Carnegie curve”,\nagainst which modern measurements are still compared. The ocean air PG\nmeasurements were extensively described in reports of the Carnegie\nInstitution of Washington (CIW) but widely used secondary sources of the\nCarnegie curve contain small differences, arising through approximations and\ntranscription errors. Investigations using the historical CIW data show that\nthe original harmonic fit coefficients are reproducible. Despite the\ninconsistencies, the secondary sources nevertheless mostly yield diurnal\nvariations which fall within the variability of the original historical\ndata.\n","PeriodicalId":48918,"journal":{"name":"History of Geo- and Space Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behind the curve: a comparison of historical sources for the Carnegie curve of the global atmospheric electric circuit\",\"authors\":\"R. Harrison\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/hgss-11-207-2020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The “Carnegie curve” describes the diurnal variation of the global\\natmospheric electric circuit. It was originally found from atmospheric\\nelectric potential gradient (PG) measurements made on the Carnegie, effectively a\\nfloating atmospheric electrical observatory, which undertook global cruises\\nbetween 1915 and 1929. These measurements confirmed that the single diurnal\\ncycle PG variation, previously obtained in both polar regions, was global in\\nextent. The averaged diurnal PG variation, represented by derived harmonic\\nfits, provides a characteristic variation known as the “Carnegie curve”,\\nagainst which modern measurements are still compared. The ocean air PG\\nmeasurements were extensively described in reports of the Carnegie\\nInstitution of Washington (CIW) but widely used secondary sources of the\\nCarnegie curve contain small differences, arising through approximations and\\ntranscription errors. Investigations using the historical CIW data show that\\nthe original harmonic fit coefficients are reproducible. Despite the\\ninconsistencies, the secondary sources nevertheless mostly yield diurnal\\nvariations which fall within the variability of the original historical\\ndata.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":48918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Geo- and Space Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Geo- and Space Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-11-207-2020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Geo- and Space Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-11-207-2020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
摘要
摘要“卡内基曲线”描述了全球大气电路的日变化。它最初是从卡内基的大气电势梯度(PG)测量中发现的,该天文台在1915年至1929年间进行了全球巡航。这些测量结果证实,先前在两极地区获得的单个昼夜周期PG变化是全局不精确的。由导出的调和系数表示的平均日PG变化提供了一种被称为“卡内基曲线”的特征变化,现代测量仍与之进行比较。CarnegieInstitution of Washington(CIW)的报告中对海洋空气PG测量进行了广泛描述,但广泛使用的Carnegie曲线的二次源包含较小的差异,这是由于近似和转换误差引起的。使用历史CIW数据进行的研究表明,原始谐波拟合系数是可重复的。尽管存在一致性,但次要来源大多产生内部变量,这些变量属于原始历史数据的可变性范围。
Behind the curve: a comparison of historical sources for the Carnegie curve of the global atmospheric electric circuit
Abstract. The “Carnegie curve” describes the diurnal variation of the global
atmospheric electric circuit. It was originally found from atmospheric
electric potential gradient (PG) measurements made on the Carnegie, effectively a
floating atmospheric electrical observatory, which undertook global cruises
between 1915 and 1929. These measurements confirmed that the single diurnal
cycle PG variation, previously obtained in both polar regions, was global in
extent. The averaged diurnal PG variation, represented by derived harmonic
fits, provides a characteristic variation known as the “Carnegie curve”,
against which modern measurements are still compared. The ocean air PG
measurements were extensively described in reports of the Carnegie
Institution of Washington (CIW) but widely used secondary sources of the
Carnegie curve contain small differences, arising through approximations and
transcription errors. Investigations using the historical CIW data show that
the original harmonic fit coefficients are reproducible. Despite the
inconsistencies, the secondary sources nevertheless mostly yield diurnal
variations which fall within the variability of the original historical
data.
期刊介绍:
The scope of History of Geo- and Space Sciences (HGSS) is to document historical facts and knowledge and to improve awareness of the history of geoscience. The knowledge of the development of geosciences and their experimental methods and theories in the past can improve our current understanding and may stimulate current research. It is encouraging for young scientists to read biographical material of historical figures in their research area. It is important as well to learn that history of science is an integrated part of the ongoing research in their research area. Another important aim of the journal is the association of historical retrospective and current research.