腰椎滑脱:为选择入路提供有意义的比较证据

Q4 Medicine
Arati Patel , Vardhaan S. Ambati , Timothy J. Yee , Andrew K. Chan , Praveen V. Mummaneni
{"title":"腰椎滑脱:为选择入路提供有意义的比较证据","authors":"Arati Patel ,&nbsp;Vardhaan S. Ambati ,&nbsp;Timothy J. Yee ,&nbsp;Andrew K. Chan ,&nbsp;Praveen V. Mummaneni","doi":"10.1016/j.semss.2023.101044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Controversy regarding optimal surgical management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis continues despite multiple </span>randomized controlled trials. To this effect a number of registries have been developed, some </span>neurosurgery and spine specific, in an effort to examine patient- and procedure- related factors and their impact on post-operative outcomes. Registries are powerful tools in understanding trends in surgery as well as the safety profile and efficacy of procedures for lumbar spondylolisthesis. This chapter reviews three major registries, NIS, NSQIP, and QOD, and their merits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39884,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Spine Surgery","volume":"35 3","pages":"Article 101044"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lumbar spondylolisthesis: Generating meaningful comparative evidence for selecting approach\",\"authors\":\"Arati Patel ,&nbsp;Vardhaan S. Ambati ,&nbsp;Timothy J. Yee ,&nbsp;Andrew K. Chan ,&nbsp;Praveen V. Mummaneni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semss.2023.101044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Controversy regarding optimal surgical management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis continues despite multiple </span>randomized controlled trials. To this effect a number of registries have been developed, some </span>neurosurgery and spine specific, in an effort to examine patient- and procedure- related factors and their impact on post-operative outcomes. Registries are powerful tools in understanding trends in surgery as well as the safety profile and efficacy of procedures for lumbar spondylolisthesis. This chapter reviews three major registries, NIS, NSQIP, and QOD, and their merits.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101044\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040738323000382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040738323000382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管进行了多项随机对照试验,但关于退行性腰椎滑脱最佳手术治疗的争议仍在继续。为此,已经开发了许多登记册,其中一些是神经外科和脊柱特有的,目的是检查患者和手术相关因素及其对术后结果的影响。登记册是了解手术趋势以及腰椎滑脱手术的安全性和疗效的有力工具。本章回顾了三个主要的注册表,NIS、NSQIP和QOD,以及它们的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lumbar spondylolisthesis: Generating meaningful comparative evidence for selecting approach

Controversy regarding optimal surgical management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis continues despite multiple randomized controlled trials. To this effect a number of registries have been developed, some neurosurgery and spine specific, in an effort to examine patient- and procedure- related factors and their impact on post-operative outcomes. Registries are powerful tools in understanding trends in surgery as well as the safety profile and efficacy of procedures for lumbar spondylolisthesis. This chapter reviews three major registries, NIS, NSQIP, and QOD, and their merits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Spine Surgery
Seminars in Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
2 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Spine Surgery is a continuing source of current, clinical information for practicing surgeons. Under the direction of a specially selected guest editor, each issue addresses a single topic in the management and care of patients. Topics covered in each issue include basic anatomy, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, management options and follow-up of the condition under consideration. The journal also features "Spinescope," a special section providing summaries of articles from other journals that are of relevance to the understanding of ongoing research related to the treatment of spinal disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信