协同效应、风险与证券交易所互联互通监管

Joseph Lee
{"title":"协同效应、风险与证券交易所互联互通监管","authors":"Joseph Lee","doi":"10.5817/MUJLT2017-2-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the author discusses the phenomenon of stock exchange interconnection and the synergies that it can bring. He investigates the methods and rationales behind various models currently employed such as the Euronext virtual model, the integration between the London Stock Exchange and the Milan Stock Exchange, and the ASEAN model in Asia. Despite the fact that there are many models of interconnection, none of them are truly interconnected in that they share a common trading platform, a single clearing house, and a single central securities depository. Divergence in national law remains a major obstacle to interconnection. This is because, notwithstanding a certain degree of harmonisation achieved in jurisdictions such as the EU, national laws continue to play an important role in regulating financial market infrastructure such as stock exchanges. Therefore, without a clear regime governing jurisdiction and applicable law, true interconnection is unlikely to be achieved.","PeriodicalId":38294,"journal":{"name":"Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology","volume":"11 1","pages":"291-322"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergies, Risks and the Regulation of Stock Exchange Interconnection\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.5817/MUJLT2017-2-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, the author discusses the phenomenon of stock exchange interconnection and the synergies that it can bring. He investigates the methods and rationales behind various models currently employed such as the Euronext virtual model, the integration between the London Stock Exchange and the Milan Stock Exchange, and the ASEAN model in Asia. Despite the fact that there are many models of interconnection, none of them are truly interconnected in that they share a common trading platform, a single clearing house, and a single central securities depository. Divergence in national law remains a major obstacle to interconnection. This is because, notwithstanding a certain degree of harmonisation achieved in jurisdictions such as the EU, national laws continue to play an important role in regulating financial market infrastructure such as stock exchanges. Therefore, without a clear regime governing jurisdiction and applicable law, true interconnection is unlikely to be achieved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"291-322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2017-2-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2017-2-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文探讨了证券交易所互联互通的现象及其带来的协同效应。他研究了目前使用的各种模型背后的方法和原理,如泛欧交易所虚拟模型,伦敦证券交易所和米兰证券交易所之间的整合,以及亚洲的东盟模型。尽管有许多互连模型,但它们都没有真正的互连,因为它们共享一个共同的交易平台,一个单一的清算所和一个单一的中央证券存管处。国内法的分歧仍然是相互联系的主要障碍。这是因为,尽管欧盟(EU)等司法管辖区实现了一定程度的协调,但各国法律在监管证券交易所等金融市场基础设施方面仍发挥着重要作用。因此,如果没有明确的管辖制度和适用法律,真正的互联是不可能实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Synergies, Risks and the Regulation of Stock Exchange Interconnection
In this article, the author discusses the phenomenon of stock exchange interconnection and the synergies that it can bring. He investigates the methods and rationales behind various models currently employed such as the Euronext virtual model, the integration between the London Stock Exchange and the Milan Stock Exchange, and the ASEAN model in Asia. Despite the fact that there are many models of interconnection, none of them are truly interconnected in that they share a common trading platform, a single clearing house, and a single central securities depository. Divergence in national law remains a major obstacle to interconnection. This is because, notwithstanding a certain degree of harmonisation achieved in jurisdictions such as the EU, national laws continue to play an important role in regulating financial market infrastructure such as stock exchanges. Therefore, without a clear regime governing jurisdiction and applicable law, true interconnection is unlikely to be achieved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信