Sumana Maiti Das, A. Bose, Suparna Kanti Pal, Suman Meyur, Siddhartha Das, Aloke Ghosh Dastidar
{"title":"辐射诱发皮肤反应中皮内G-CSF浸润的随机II期试验","authors":"Sumana Maiti Das, A. Bose, Suparna Kanti Pal, Suman Meyur, Siddhartha Das, Aloke Ghosh Dastidar","doi":"10.51248/.v43i3.736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and Aim: Radiation induced skin reactions (RISR) often delays the treatment affecting compliance and outcomes. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is known to recruit dermo-genic stem cells and help in healing. Very few studies are there to evaluate its potential in this regard. This study evaluates intradermal infiltration of G-CSF for its effectiveness, effect on treatment delay and quality of life in comparison to conventional treatment for grade 3/4 RISR.\n \nMaterials and Methods: Patients experiencing advanced RISR due to any regimen of external beam radiation above 50 Gy of 2 Gy equivalent doses were randomized to undergo treatment either with intradermal G-CSF infiltration at margin and bases of lesion along with conventional therapies or with only conventional anti-inflammatory/ antibiotic therapy. The experimental arm and the control arm had 62 and 60 patients respectively analyzed for time taken for re-epithelization and treatment delay. Also.pre and two weeks post-treatment global quality of life and pain scores were taken for qualitative comparison between the arms.\n \nResults: G-CSF arm took a mean 5.2 (95percent CI=4.4-5.7) days, significantly less than conventional treatment arm (Mean=7.5 days, 95percent CI= 6.8-8.1,p=0.002) for re-epithelization. Grade of toxicity adjusted hazard ratio of non-resolution in 10 days time was 2.98 for the control arm over the experimental arm(p=.046). Treatment gap was significantly less in the G-CSF arm (48.4 percent vs 68.3percent, p=0.026), with average delay of treatment being significantly reduced (p 0.001). A ten-day delay adjusted survival was significantly better in the experimental arm (Mantel-Cox Log rank test, X2=12.26, p 0.001).\n \nConclusion: Intradermal perilesional G-CSF infiltration for advanced RISR hastens wound healing compared to conventional treatment and significantly reduces the chances of treatment delay.","PeriodicalId":51650,"journal":{"name":"BioMedicine-Taiwan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomised phase II trial of intra-dermal G-CSF infiltration in radiation induced skin reactions\",\"authors\":\"Sumana Maiti Das, A. Bose, Suparna Kanti Pal, Suman Meyur, Siddhartha Das, Aloke Ghosh Dastidar\",\"doi\":\"10.51248/.v43i3.736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction and Aim: Radiation induced skin reactions (RISR) often delays the treatment affecting compliance and outcomes. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is known to recruit dermo-genic stem cells and help in healing. Very few studies are there to evaluate its potential in this regard. This study evaluates intradermal infiltration of G-CSF for its effectiveness, effect on treatment delay and quality of life in comparison to conventional treatment for grade 3/4 RISR.\\n \\nMaterials and Methods: Patients experiencing advanced RISR due to any regimen of external beam radiation above 50 Gy of 2 Gy equivalent doses were randomized to undergo treatment either with intradermal G-CSF infiltration at margin and bases of lesion along with conventional therapies or with only conventional anti-inflammatory/ antibiotic therapy. The experimental arm and the control arm had 62 and 60 patients respectively analyzed for time taken for re-epithelization and treatment delay. Also.pre and two weeks post-treatment global quality of life and pain scores were taken for qualitative comparison between the arms.\\n \\nResults: G-CSF arm took a mean 5.2 (95percent CI=4.4-5.7) days, significantly less than conventional treatment arm (Mean=7.5 days, 95percent CI= 6.8-8.1,p=0.002) for re-epithelization. Grade of toxicity adjusted hazard ratio of non-resolution in 10 days time was 2.98 for the control arm over the experimental arm(p=.046). Treatment gap was significantly less in the G-CSF arm (48.4 percent vs 68.3percent, p=0.026), with average delay of treatment being significantly reduced (p 0.001). A ten-day delay adjusted survival was significantly better in the experimental arm (Mantel-Cox Log rank test, X2=12.26, p 0.001).\\n \\nConclusion: Intradermal perilesional G-CSF infiltration for advanced RISR hastens wound healing compared to conventional treatment and significantly reduces the chances of treatment delay.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioMedicine-Taiwan\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioMedicine-Taiwan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51248/.v43i3.736\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMedicine-Taiwan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51248/.v43i3.736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A randomised phase II trial of intra-dermal G-CSF infiltration in radiation induced skin reactions
Introduction and Aim: Radiation induced skin reactions (RISR) often delays the treatment affecting compliance and outcomes. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is known to recruit dermo-genic stem cells and help in healing. Very few studies are there to evaluate its potential in this regard. This study evaluates intradermal infiltration of G-CSF for its effectiveness, effect on treatment delay and quality of life in comparison to conventional treatment for grade 3/4 RISR.
Materials and Methods: Patients experiencing advanced RISR due to any regimen of external beam radiation above 50 Gy of 2 Gy equivalent doses were randomized to undergo treatment either with intradermal G-CSF infiltration at margin and bases of lesion along with conventional therapies or with only conventional anti-inflammatory/ antibiotic therapy. The experimental arm and the control arm had 62 and 60 patients respectively analyzed for time taken for re-epithelization and treatment delay. Also.pre and two weeks post-treatment global quality of life and pain scores were taken for qualitative comparison between the arms.
Results: G-CSF arm took a mean 5.2 (95percent CI=4.4-5.7) days, significantly less than conventional treatment arm (Mean=7.5 days, 95percent CI= 6.8-8.1,p=0.002) for re-epithelization. Grade of toxicity adjusted hazard ratio of non-resolution in 10 days time was 2.98 for the control arm over the experimental arm(p=.046). Treatment gap was significantly less in the G-CSF arm (48.4 percent vs 68.3percent, p=0.026), with average delay of treatment being significantly reduced (p 0.001). A ten-day delay adjusted survival was significantly better in the experimental arm (Mantel-Cox Log rank test, X2=12.26, p 0.001).
Conclusion: Intradermal perilesional G-CSF infiltration for advanced RISR hastens wound healing compared to conventional treatment and significantly reduces the chances of treatment delay.