什么是工作场所不文明行为?员工关系图式调查

Q2 Social Sciences
Jonathan Samosh
{"title":"什么是工作场所不文明行为?员工关系图式调查","authors":"Jonathan Samosh","doi":"10.1080/15416518.2019.1604197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This qualitative study investigated relational schemas of workplace incivility to develop an understanding of incivility from the employee perspective, refine theoretical comprehension of the incivility construct, and begin collecting data to support development of applied interventions. Two hundred and five currently employed respondents answered open-ended survey questions about schematic features of incivility and normative questions about how it should be addressed at work. Responses were analyzed with phenomenological methodology. Workplace incivility was defined in relational schemas similarly to current scholarly conceptualization, but respondents’ examples of incivility included more severe mistreatment as well. Perpetrators, targets, bystanders, and interveners were identified as the primary roles engaged with incivility. Respondents called for active prevention and intervention against incivility, directed by organizational leadership. Rich segments of illustrative qualitative data are presented throughout the article. Researchers should note results indicating construct proliferation in workplace mistreatment literature. Practitioners should consider the roles of leaders and bystanders in addressing workplace incivility.","PeriodicalId":39393,"journal":{"name":"Organization Management Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"81 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15416518.2019.1604197","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is Workplace Incivility? An Investigation of Employee Relational Schemas\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Samosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15416518.2019.1604197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This qualitative study investigated relational schemas of workplace incivility to develop an understanding of incivility from the employee perspective, refine theoretical comprehension of the incivility construct, and begin collecting data to support development of applied interventions. Two hundred and five currently employed respondents answered open-ended survey questions about schematic features of incivility and normative questions about how it should be addressed at work. Responses were analyzed with phenomenological methodology. Workplace incivility was defined in relational schemas similarly to current scholarly conceptualization, but respondents’ examples of incivility included more severe mistreatment as well. Perpetrators, targets, bystanders, and interveners were identified as the primary roles engaged with incivility. Respondents called for active prevention and intervention against incivility, directed by organizational leadership. Rich segments of illustrative qualitative data are presented throughout the article. Researchers should note results indicating construct proliferation in workplace mistreatment literature. Practitioners should consider the roles of leaders and bystanders in addressing workplace incivility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organization Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"81 - 97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15416518.2019.1604197\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organization Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15416518.2019.1604197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15416518.2019.1604197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本研究旨在从员工的角度理解职场不文明行为的相关图式,完善对不文明行为结构的理论理解,并开始收集数据以支持应用干预措施的开发。225名在职受访者回答了关于不文明行为的概要特征的开放式调查问题,以及关于如何在工作中解决不文明行为的规范性问题。用现象学方法分析反应。工作场所的不文明行为在关系图式中被定义,与当前的学术概念相似,但受访者的不文明行为例子也包括更严重的虐待。肇事者、目标、旁观者和干预者被确定为参与不文明行为的主要角色。受访者呼吁在组织领导的指导下,积极预防和干预不文明行为。丰富的片段说明性定性数据呈现在整个文章。研究人员应该注意工作场所虐待文献中结构增殖的结果。从业者应该考虑领导者和旁观者在解决工作场所不文明行为方面的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What is Workplace Incivility? An Investigation of Employee Relational Schemas
ABSTRACT This qualitative study investigated relational schemas of workplace incivility to develop an understanding of incivility from the employee perspective, refine theoretical comprehension of the incivility construct, and begin collecting data to support development of applied interventions. Two hundred and five currently employed respondents answered open-ended survey questions about schematic features of incivility and normative questions about how it should be addressed at work. Responses were analyzed with phenomenological methodology. Workplace incivility was defined in relational schemas similarly to current scholarly conceptualization, but respondents’ examples of incivility included more severe mistreatment as well. Perpetrators, targets, bystanders, and interveners were identified as the primary roles engaged with incivility. Respondents called for active prevention and intervention against incivility, directed by organizational leadership. Rich segments of illustrative qualitative data are presented throughout the article. Researchers should note results indicating construct proliferation in workplace mistreatment literature. Practitioners should consider the roles of leaders and bystanders in addressing workplace incivility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Organization Management Journal
Organization Management Journal Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Organization Management Journal is a blind peer-reviewed online publication sponsored by the Eastern Academy of Management. OMJ is designed as a forum for broad philosophical, social, and practical thought about management and organizing. We are interested in papers that address the interface between theoretical insight and practical application and enhance the teaching of management. OMJ publishes scholarly empirical and theoretical papers, review articles, essays and resources for management educators. Appropriate domains include: -Organizational behavior- Business strategy and policy- Organizational theory- Human resource management- Management education, particularly experiential education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信