“南亚巴勒斯坦”和“中东克什米尔”:占领军和镇压青年的平行案例研究

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
IPRI Journal Pub Date : 2019-10-25 DOI:10.31945/iprij.190205
Lubna Abid Ali, Sana Imtiaz Kitchlew
{"title":"“南亚巴勒斯坦”和“中东克什米尔”:占领军和镇压青年的平行案例研究","authors":"Lubna Abid Ali, Sana Imtiaz Kitchlew","doi":"10.31945/iprij.190205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the world continues to watch, India and Israel continue their military control over Kashmir and Palestine respectively, resulting in two of the most protracted and deadliest conflicts with strong parallels. The United Nations (UN) Resolutions, 194 and 242 in the context of the Palestine-Israeli dispute; and UN Resolutions of August 13, 1948 and January 5, 1949 in the context of the Kashmir dispute, advocate the right of selfdetermination for Palestinians and Kashmiris, respectively. However, they have not been implemented to date. This article compares the two significant disputes by employing the Youth Bulge Theory to demonstrate that although both disputed territories are situated in different regions, yet their youth share similar accounts of subjugation, which have culminated in similar atrocities and massive crackdown on them by occupying forces. It has led to increased violence, deaths and frustration, producing generations of young freedom fighters involved in a political struggle. A comparative analysis draws on similarities and dissimilarities between these two disputes. * The author is Dean of Faculty of Contemporary Studies, Professor and HOD of the Department of International Relations at the National Defence University, Pakistan. She can be contacted at: lubnaali_54@hotmail.com. ** The author is part of the visiting faculty at the National Defence University, Pakistan. She can be contacted at: sanakitchlew@gmail.com. _____________________ @2019 by the Islamabad Policy Research Institute. IPRI Journal  XIX (2): 120-148. https://doi.org/10.31945/iprij.190205. ‘South Asian Palestine’ and ‘Middle Eastern Kashmir’: Case Studies of Occupation Forces and Crackdown on Youth IPRI JOURNAL  SUMMER 2019 121","PeriodicalId":41363,"journal":{"name":"IPRI Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘South Asian Palestine’ and ‘Middle Eastern Kashmir’: Parallel Case Studies of Occupation Forces and Crackdown on Youth\",\"authors\":\"Lubna Abid Ali, Sana Imtiaz Kitchlew\",\"doi\":\"10.31945/iprij.190205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the world continues to watch, India and Israel continue their military control over Kashmir and Palestine respectively, resulting in two of the most protracted and deadliest conflicts with strong parallels. The United Nations (UN) Resolutions, 194 and 242 in the context of the Palestine-Israeli dispute; and UN Resolutions of August 13, 1948 and January 5, 1949 in the context of the Kashmir dispute, advocate the right of selfdetermination for Palestinians and Kashmiris, respectively. However, they have not been implemented to date. This article compares the two significant disputes by employing the Youth Bulge Theory to demonstrate that although both disputed territories are situated in different regions, yet their youth share similar accounts of subjugation, which have culminated in similar atrocities and massive crackdown on them by occupying forces. It has led to increased violence, deaths and frustration, producing generations of young freedom fighters involved in a political struggle. A comparative analysis draws on similarities and dissimilarities between these two disputes. * The author is Dean of Faculty of Contemporary Studies, Professor and HOD of the Department of International Relations at the National Defence University, Pakistan. She can be contacted at: lubnaali_54@hotmail.com. ** The author is part of the visiting faculty at the National Defence University, Pakistan. She can be contacted at: sanakitchlew@gmail.com. _____________________ @2019 by the Islamabad Policy Research Institute. IPRI Journal  XIX (2): 120-148. https://doi.org/10.31945/iprij.190205. ‘South Asian Palestine’ and ‘Middle Eastern Kashmir’: Case Studies of Occupation Forces and Crackdown on Youth IPRI JOURNAL  SUMMER 2019 121\",\"PeriodicalId\":41363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IPRI Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IPRI Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31945/iprij.190205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IPRI Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31945/iprij.190205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着世界继续关注,印度和以色列分别继续对克什米尔和巴勒斯坦进行军事控制,导致了两场最持久、最致命的冲突。联合国关于巴以争端的第194号和第242号决议;以及联合国1948年8月13日和1949年1月5日关于克什米尔争端的决议,分别主张巴勒斯坦人和克什米尔人的自决权。然而,它们至今尚未得到执行。本文运用青年膨胀理论对这两个重大争端进行了比较,以证明尽管这两个有争议的领土位于不同的地区,但他们的年轻人却有着相似的被征服的经历,这些经历最终导致了类似的暴行和占领军对他们的大规模镇压。它导致暴力、死亡和挫折增加,使一代又一代的年轻自由战士卷入政治斗争。对这两起纠纷的异同进行了比较分析。*作者是巴基斯坦国防大学当代研究学院院长、国际关系系教授兼主任。她的联系方式是:lubnaali_54@hotmail.com。**作者是巴基斯坦国防大学的访问学者。她的联系方式是:sanakitchlew@gmail.com。_____________________ @ 2019年巴基斯坦政策研究所。IPRI学报(2):120-148。https://doi.org/10.31945/iprij.190205。“南亚巴勒斯坦”和“中东克什米尔”:占领军和镇压青年的案例研究IPRI期刊
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘South Asian Palestine’ and ‘Middle Eastern Kashmir’: Parallel Case Studies of Occupation Forces and Crackdown on Youth
As the world continues to watch, India and Israel continue their military control over Kashmir and Palestine respectively, resulting in two of the most protracted and deadliest conflicts with strong parallels. The United Nations (UN) Resolutions, 194 and 242 in the context of the Palestine-Israeli dispute; and UN Resolutions of August 13, 1948 and January 5, 1949 in the context of the Kashmir dispute, advocate the right of selfdetermination for Palestinians and Kashmiris, respectively. However, they have not been implemented to date. This article compares the two significant disputes by employing the Youth Bulge Theory to demonstrate that although both disputed territories are situated in different regions, yet their youth share similar accounts of subjugation, which have culminated in similar atrocities and massive crackdown on them by occupying forces. It has led to increased violence, deaths and frustration, producing generations of young freedom fighters involved in a political struggle. A comparative analysis draws on similarities and dissimilarities between these two disputes. * The author is Dean of Faculty of Contemporary Studies, Professor and HOD of the Department of International Relations at the National Defence University, Pakistan. She can be contacted at: lubnaali_54@hotmail.com. ** The author is part of the visiting faculty at the National Defence University, Pakistan. She can be contacted at: sanakitchlew@gmail.com. _____________________ @2019 by the Islamabad Policy Research Institute. IPRI Journal  XIX (2): 120-148. https://doi.org/10.31945/iprij.190205. ‘South Asian Palestine’ and ‘Middle Eastern Kashmir’: Case Studies of Occupation Forces and Crackdown on Youth IPRI JOURNAL  SUMMER 2019 121
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IPRI Journal
IPRI Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信